Falco Lombardi
Registered User
What if Petro is getting 9+ offers from LV and Columbus? Still Army’s fault?
Yes
What if Petro is getting 9+ offers from LV and Columbus? Still Army’s fault?
I'd like that too TBH but think its just a dream at this point.
Good. I'm fine with swapping Dunn for Krug and giving Faulk the Tyler Johnson treatment (it ain't my money).
Let him go, or he moved on?We let a top 5 defensman go for a powerplay specialist. I’m glad you’re happy about it.
Let him go, or he moved on?
Neither is swapping out top talent for worse talent.How?
Overpaying players for past performance is not a key for sustained success regardless of the circumstances or sentimental value.
Look at Chicago, LA.
And you believe that? If that's the case I expect we'll see petro firing his agent tomorrow.Most reporters are saying Petro's intention was was to wait out offers and see where he wanted to land. There was no deal in place, and LeBrun speculates the Blues taking themselves out on the market most likely caught him off guard.
Neither is swapping out top talent for worse talent.
How?
Overpaying players for past performance is not a key for sustained success regardless of the circumstances or sentimental value.
Look at Chicago, LA.
How?
Overpaying players for past performance is not a key for sustained success regardless of the circumstances or sentimental value.
Look at Chicago, LA.
And you believe that? If that's the case I expect we'll see petro firing his agent tomorrow.
Overpaying overrated players ain't a recipe either.
Good lord, imagine thinking Torey Krug and Justin Faulk for the next decade is a good thing
If you are asking me if I'd rather have Pietrangelo at 9 million or Krug at 6.5 for the next 7 years each, I'm taking Petro at 9 and I'm not thinking twice. He has the type of game based around intelligence more then physical attributes, and those players age well. Look at Giordano, Letang, and Weber.
You don't even know what he was offered or even if he wanted to stay.and you think we would’ve left even if he was offered a fair contract?
This league has no loyalty to any player, so I don’t blame players for wanting to be paid.
Pay your stars like it’s not f***ing complicated.
It is when you can have more good players currently and in the future than to be unable to be paying players out of their primes who aren’t performing well for 5+ years.
I think you need to re-type your sentence because I don't know what you're saying here.
Are you saying that Pietrangelo's contract was going to block more good players from their contracts? Or are you saying that it would be harder to move Pietrangelo's contract in the future after 5 years time?
Krug isn’t overrated and Faulk was used in the lineup in a way he shouldn’t have.
I’d prefer keeping Petro over signing Krug, but to act as if Krug isn’t a good player in his own right is not right.