Confirmed with Link: [TOR/NJD] Andreas Johnsson for Joey Anderson

Martin Skoula

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
11,767
16,585
He hasn't been healthy for more than 2 years. He had a great Calder trophy run then a good season, cashed in and has not live up to that contract since.

Not being able to rebound from a normal injury because he caught a once in a lifetime virus doesn't change that he signed a market value contract at the time. If you sign a 40 point RFA to a market value deal and he gets in a car crash on the way home, that doesn't make the contract he signed an overpayment because a freak incident took away his ability to play at the level you paid for.

Either way, he was moved for positive value, this isn't even a good use of revisionist history.
 

Bluelines

Python FTW!
Nov 17, 2013
12,349
4,559
Not being able to rebound from a normal injury because he caught a once in a lifetime virus doesn't change that he signed a market value contract at the time. If you sign a 40 point RFA to a market value deal and he gets in a car crash on the way home, that doesn't make the contract he signed an overpayment because a freak incident took away his ability to play at the level you paid for.

Either way, he was moved for positive value, this isn't even a good use of revisionist history.

Maybe its revisionist because the memory you had was false? AJ had one good NHL season, not normally the recipe for a 4.3 times increase in compensation, one season, one good season. For the Leaf fans that clearly remember him, he was small, had a motor that would not quit and bounced off most opponents with regularity. His skill set was not uncommon, what was uncommon was a guy with one year experience receiving a 4.3 times raise. It was not a good value contract, is not a good value contract and will never be a good value contract.
 
  • Like
Reactions: usernamezrhardtodo

Martin Skoula

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
11,767
16,585
Maybe its revisionist because the memory you had was false? AJ had one good NHL season, not normally the recipe for a 4.3 times increase in compensation, one season, one good season. For the Leaf fans that clearly remember him, he was small, had a motor that would not quit and bounced off most opponents with regularity. His skill set was not uncommon, what was uncommon was a guy with one year experience receiving a 4.3 times raise. It was not a good value contract, is not a good value contract and will never be a good value contract.

Crazy that NJ gave us value for a bad value contract out of their own volition, lucky Dubas.
 

Nylanderthal

Registered User
Jun 9, 2010
7,892
6,237
Unsurprisingly, you're completely ignoring the value of having those players for the time we did, the fact that the Marleau trade was about more than just Kapanen and Johnsson, the fact that the expansion draft necessitated an asset loss for everybody, and the fact that the global pandemic-induced flat cap caused those "cap space issues" that required a change of plans for pretty much everybody in the league.
Minor details… more like footnotes lol. it’s amazing the lengths some posters here are willing to go to sell a narrative
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dekes For Days

Bluelines

Python FTW!
Nov 17, 2013
12,349
4,559
Minor details… more like footnotes lol. it’s amazing the lengths some posters here are willing to go to sell a narrative

... and the fact people keep bringing up the pandemic as a excuse for GM's not having cap space. In 2006 the league established an escrow system in order to protect the owners from a situation where revenues would not follow projections. The league told everyone 15 years ago through the escrow system, it was one of the sticking points during the lock out/strike that the league would not budge on, don't expect your revenues to be on an upward trajectory for infinity, there is a possibility that revenues could stagnate or drop.

If the league felt so passionately about protecting the owners from flat revenues, why in F would GM's just ignore that warning and spend to the cap expecting to have more cap next year, and the next year and so on?

You couldn't predict a pandemic with any certainty but you sure as heck could predict a recession, they are cyclical, they are ever present in our economy. there were financial indicators back when Marner, Matthews and Nylander signed (The Inverted Yield Curve and Recession | Robert P. Murphy), we knew a down turn in the economy was coming, we didn't know a pandemic would coincide at the same time. We know every decade there will be a stretch of 2 or 3 years when the economy is in a valley, we know revenues will be flat as a result. Over estimate your expenses, underestimate your revenue (income). It's budgeting 101.
 

ACC1224

Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
Aug 19, 2002
73,895
39,470
Bad GM's overvalue players all the time, yes Dubas was indeed lucky.
Good GM's overvalue players as well. There isn't a GM in existence that hasn't made a bad trade/signing/pick at some point.
 

Sypher04

Registered User
Jan 20, 2011
11,585
9,825
... and the fact people keep bringing up the pandemic as a excuse for GM's not having cap space. In 2006 the league established an escrow system in order to protect the owners from a situation where revenues would not follow projections. The league told everyone 15 years ago through the escrow system, it was one of the sticking points during the lock out/strike that the league would not budge on, don't expect your revenues to be on an upward trajectory for infinity, there is a possibility that revenues could stagnate or drop.

If the league felt so passionately about protecting the owners from flat revenues, why in F would GM's just ignore that warning and spend to the cap expecting to have more cap next year, and the next year and so on?

You couldn't predict a pandemic with any certainty but you sure as heck could predict a recession, they are cyclical, they are ever present in our economy. there were financial indicators back when Marner, Matthews and Nylander signed (The Inverted Yield Curve and Recession | Robert P. Murphy), we knew a down turn in the economy was coming, we didn't know a pandemic would coincide at the same time. We know every decade there will be a stretch of 2 or 3 years when the economy is in a valley, we know revenues will be flat as a result. Over estimate your expenses, underestimate your revenue (income). It's budgeting 101.

And yet, every single team negotiated long term deals just the same as Dubas did, with their young players with cap projection 100% involved.

Even IF cap growth had stagnated, which there is no evidence was looming, as even modest growth years saw the cap grow by small amounts, the promise of the upcoming US TV deal this year and new revenue from the Seattle franchise would once again propell the cap.
 

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
20,254
15,409
AJ had one good NHL season, not normally the recipe for a 4.3 times increase in compensation
There's nothing unusual about a player getting 3.4m after the year Johnsson had. Players see a "4.3 time" jump, and sometimes much bigger ones, all the time, as they show what they can do in the NHL and move off their ELCs. The contract was just fine, which is why we got value for it, during the offseason with the least available league-wide cap, even after he had a worse season.
You couldn't predict a pandemic with any certainty but you sure as heck could predict a recession
Even in the case of a recession, which even if it happened, would not have been as bad as the previous recession, the cap would have still seen significant and rapid growth. We were looking at a ~3.5m jump that next offseason alone, even before any of the new revenue sources. The only reason we are seeing this stagnation in the cap is the pandemic.
 

aingefan

Registered User
Feb 27, 2008
4,662
2,547
AJ was pretty good until injuries.
Hasn’t bounced back.
JA is tenacious, hope he gets a crack this year.
 

Nylanderthal

Registered User
Jun 9, 2010
7,892
6,237
... and the fact people keep bringing up the pandemic as a excuse for GM's not having cap space. In 2006 the league established an escrow system in order to protect the owners from a situation where revenues would not follow projections. The league told everyone 15 years ago through the escrow system, it was one of the sticking points during the lock out/strike that the league would not budge on, don't expect your revenues to be on an upward trajectory for infinity, there is a possibility that revenues could stagnate or drop.

If the league felt so passionately about protecting the owners from flat revenues, why in F would GM's just ignore that warning and spend to the cap expecting to have more cap next year, and the next year and so on?

You couldn't predict a pandemic with any certainty but you sure as heck could predict a recession, they are cyclical, they are ever present in our economy. there were financial indicators back when Marner, Matthews and Nylander signed (The Inverted Yield Curve and Recession | Robert P. Murphy), we knew a down turn in the economy was coming, we didn't know a pandemic would coincide at the same time. We know every decade there will be a stretch of 2 or 3 years when the economy is in a valley, we know revenues will be flat as a result. Over estimate your expenses, underestimate your revenue (income). It's budgeting 101.
Tldr but yeah, let’s blame management for not predicting a fookin global shutdown.
 

nuck

Schrodingers Cat
Aug 18, 2005
11,414
2,488
Even some uninjured players did not have a decent Covid year. Also NJ crushed its players offense last season so he might not be as done as he looks but it could also be he isn't Ruff material. Best of luck to him. Anderson also regressed statistically last season but the team as a whole had some problems. He may not be Moore material.
 

usernamezrhardtodo

Registered User
Mar 26, 2014
2,320
2,773
... and the fact people keep bringing up the pandemic as a excuse for GM's not having cap space. In 2006 the league established an escrow system in order to protect the owners from a situation where revenues would not follow projections. The league told everyone 15 years ago through the escrow system, it was one of the sticking points during the lock out/strike that the league would not budge on, don't expect your revenues to be on an upward trajectory for infinity, there is a possibility that revenues could stagnate or drop.

If the league felt so passionately about protecting the owners from flat revenues, why in F would GM's just ignore that warning and spend to the cap expecting to have more cap next year, and the next year and so on?

You couldn't predict a pandemic with any certainty but you sure as heck could predict a recession, they are cyclical, they are ever present in our economy. there were financial indicators back when Marner, Matthews and Nylander signed (The Inverted Yield Curve and Recession | Robert P. Murphy), we knew a down turn in the economy was coming, we didn't know a pandemic would coincide at the same time. We know every decade there will be a stretch of 2 or 3 years when the economy is in a valley, we know revenues will be flat as a result. Over estimate your expenses, underestimate your revenue (income). It's budgeting 101.

Stop making so much sense...it might hurt the narrative that Covid was the only thing that could've messed up the cap.
 
Last edited:

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
... and the fact people keep bringing up the pandemic as a excuse for GM's not having cap space. In 2006 the league established an escrow system in order to protect the owners from a situation where revenues would not follow projections. The league told everyone 15 years ago through the escrow system, it was one of the sticking points during the lock out/strike that the league would not budge on, don't expect your revenues to be on an upward trajectory for infinity, there is a possibility that revenues could stagnate or drop.

If the league felt so passionately about protecting the owners from flat revenues, why in F would GM's just ignore that warning and spend to the cap expecting to have more cap next year, and the next year and so on?

You couldn't predict a pandemic with any certainty but you sure as heck could predict a recession, they are cyclical, they are ever present in our economy. there were financial indicators back when Marner, Matthews and Nylander signed (The Inverted Yield Curve and Recession | Robert P. Murphy), we knew a down turn in the economy was coming, we didn't know a pandemic would coincide at the same time. We know every decade there will be a stretch of 2 or 3 years when the economy is in a valley, we know revenues will be flat as a result. Over estimate your expenses, underestimate your revenue (income). It's budgeting 101.

This literally has nothing to do with capspace.


Anyways, another solid trade by Dubey.
 

acrobaticgoalie

Registered User
Jun 18, 2014
3,358
3,391
The problem is that our bigger players act like they are 5'9" when they play. I don't care about the height of the player as much as his willingness to play hard.
I agree. I'll take a team full of Yanni Gourdes all day. The narrative that Dubas built a tiny team is really dumb. Soft? Absolutely. Tiny, no. Move Engvall and bring in Cizikas or someone who plays with more bite.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gallagbi

saffronleaf

Registered User
May 17, 2011
25,967
27,977
Toronto, ON
Hope Anderson becomes a regular in the lineup. From the little I've read about him, he seems Hyman-like in some respects (hustle, puck retrieval, speed). Maybe he can slot in higher in the lineup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Havoc

Havoc

Registered User
Jul 25, 2009
7,304
7,539
... and the fact people keep bringing up the pandemic as a excuse for GM's not having cap space. In 2006 the league established an escrow system in order to protect the owners from a situation where revenues would not follow projections. The league told everyone 15 years ago through the escrow system, it was one of the sticking points during the lock out/strike that the league would not budge on, don't expect your revenues to be on an upward trajectory for infinity, there is a possibility that revenues could stagnate or drop.

If the league felt so passionately about protecting the owners from flat revenues, why in F would GM's just ignore that warning and spend to the cap expecting to have more cap next year, and the next year and so on?

You couldn't predict a pandemic with any certainty but you sure as heck could predict a recession, they are cyclical, they are ever present in our economy. there were financial indicators back when Marner, Matthews and Nylander signed (The Inverted Yield Curve and Recession | Robert P. Murphy), we knew a down turn in the economy was coming, we didn't know a pandemic would coincide at the same time. We know every decade there will be a stretch of 2 or 3 years when the economy is in a valley, we know revenues will be flat as a result. Over estimate your expenses, underestimate your revenue (income). It's budgeting 101.

The actual financial geniuses around the entire league, not only the Leafs, predicted it would be around 84-88 by now. Really interested to see your counter claim to these people. Enlighten us why the cap was not actually going to rise in a world covid never happened?
 

Bluelines

Python FTW!
Nov 17, 2013
12,349
4,559
The actual financial geniuses around the entire league, not only the Leafs, predicted it would be around 84-88 by now. Really interested to see your counter claim to these people. Enlighten us why the cap was not actually going to rise in a world covid never happened?


The answer to the question you asked was clearly in the post you replied to, last paragraph.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad