Any idea what the lineup is going to be?
looks like rangers are now cup contenders. we start to make a move up in the standings
It's one game
Phaneuf - Gunnar
Fraser - Franson
Liles/Gard - Kostka/ OB
Best guess?
Phaneuf - Gunnar
Fraser - Franson
Liles/Gard - Kostka/ OB
Best guess?
No way kostka plays or I might burn the boats myself
The difference is the quality of shots we allow. We hardly allow teams into the middle of the ice.
And the universe requires that the EVsave% change as the goalie moves from team to team, if shot quality doesn't exist at all, well it will average .0122. With these 66 goalies it averages .0133. There is nowhere near enough veracity to even declare that a difference in shot quality exists at all, but again the distribution is a smidge wider with the real than it is with the random, so I'll give the benefit of the doubt and say that, on average, the difference in shot quality from any two teams selected at random ... the expected difference will be 2 goals on the season.
Together, Fenwick/Corsi and Luck account for around 3/4 of team winning percentage. What's the remainder? Goaltending talent - which Tom Awad estimates at about 5% - and special teams, along with a very small sliver that's due to shooting talent and the oft-mentioned "shot quality."
There's an interesting contradiction here: even though shot distance and shot location/quality are persistent, shooting percentage is very luck-driven.
Bottom line: shot distance/location/quality is just a tiny sliver of shooting percentage (both for and against.) When you factor in the 33% regression to the mean we see in odd and even samples, shot quality accounts for just under 10% of team shooting percentage.
http://vhockey.blogspot.com/2009/07/shot-quality-fantasy.html
http://www.arcticicehockey.com/2010/11/25/1835371/retro-nhl-and-anger-at-corsi
http://www.arcticicehockey.com/2011/10/25/2512376/luck-vs-shot-quality-in-shooting-percentage
I maintain that we're winning because James Reimer is tied for 6th in SV%, not because of a defensive system of debatable merit employed by one Mr. Carlyle.
I like this move, we needed a decent right handed dman, and we got one cheap. Not super exciting or anything, but a good move.
He is not a good D though, the only thing Nonis did was ensure an early exit out of the playoffs with his non moves
He is not a good D though, the only thing Nonis did was ensure an early exit out of the playoffs with his non moves
Not sure why the Leafs would target O'Byrne and Kipper as their deadline targets. Both having terrible seasons. Makes me worry a bit about our pro scouting.
Isn't Holzer better than this guy? It might be ok if we give up a 6th rounder for him but a 4th rounder is an overpayment imo. We only get a 4th (though could be a 3rd) for Lombardi.
How do you know he's not a good D?
If Kessel scores in his first game, does that mean he's going to score 82 goals?
Look at Brassard and Moore tonight..they sucked in CBJ, and played well tonight.
Look at Clowe...he had a 3 point game.
Look at Lupul he was considered a cap dump and now he's King Joffrey.
Just because he sucked on a bad team, it doesn't mean he'll suck on the Leafs.
It's a 4th round pick.
Look at the BIG picture. What did the Habs do? They're fighting for the division and did nothing. The Leafs did the right thing.
Perhaps they didn't want to spend much right now?
Nonis said from the start that he wasn't going to sell off pieces but he never said he'll be making big moves.
Leafs were going after Kipper because of 700+ NHL game experience.
ROB also has 300 games under his belt and looked good last year with Liles.
sorry, wasn't around after the trade and don't want to scan whole thread,
has anyone made 'free wallet' joke yet?
http://vhockey.blogspot.com/2009/07/shot-quality-fantasy.html
http://www.arcticicehockey.com/2010/11/25/1835371/retro-nhl-and-anger-at-corsi
http://www.arcticicehockey.com/2011/10/25/2512376/luck-vs-shot-quality-in-shooting-percentage
I maintain that we're winning because James Reimer is tied for 6th in SV%, not because of a defensive system of debatable merit employed by one Mr. Carlyle.
Hahahaha Holzer is ****ing terrible.