Confirmed with Link: [TOR/CBJ/SJS] TOR acquire Nick Foligno [75% Retained] & Stefan Noesen for 2021 1st, 2021 & 2022 4ths

Status
Not open for further replies.

Menzinger

Kessel4LadyByng
Apr 24, 2014
41,202
32,862
St. Paul, MN
you're the one making the excuses not them , i thought i made that clear

maybe he changed his mind because he had to quarantine for half the time , did you think of that or did you ignore it because you're so consumed with defending the Dube's every move

Reposting what journalists have reported and discussed on a player/trade isn't making "excuses" lol.

Unless you have anything tangible (and we both know you don't have anything) like a counter media report that suggested the player would have been overjoyed to come to Toronto, or that he had actually changed his mind on the quarantine issue, you're doing nothing but argue for the sake of arguing.
 

Ziggdiezan

Registered User
Apr 10, 2015
10,847
5,676
Even Strength Offense, this year:

Palmieri: 37gms, 6gls, 11pts
Foligno: 42gms, 6gls, 11pts

last year:

Palmieri: 65gms, 14gls, 27pts
Foligno: 67gms, 8gls, 26pts

year before:

Palmieri: 74gms, 16gls, 32pts
Foligno: 73gms, 15gls, 31pts

and Palmieri does that in offensive usage with high ozone starts, while Foligno does it in elite defensive usage.

so in short, because foligno is better.
Looking at their rates if you normalize for ice time at even strength Foligno produces far less goals, he put up half as many goals per 60 last year for example. As we know from contract stuff, goals are valued far higher than assists and Palmieri is a much much better goal scorer than Foligno at all strengths.

That isn't even going into the fact Palmieri produces like 3x more goals and points on the PP per 60 while getting pretty similar PP time the last 3 years (2.5-3 mins for Palmieri and 2.5 for Foligno). Leafs PP is struggling too...

Something tells me your angle would be way different if leafs grabbed Palmieri not Foligno
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kurtz

Ziggdiezan

Registered User
Apr 10, 2015
10,847
5,676
But you have no way to identity them.

You could only see that as a positive if you're bad at scouting and like playing the odds instead, but that's not how you should be drafting.
You see a positive because there is a higher chance top 10 talents drops to the late 1st round because of less scouting means the draft order won't be as set. It is definitely playing the odds but there is more chance this year of getting a really good prospect in the late 1st round than a normal year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kurtz

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
Looking at their rates if you normalize for ice time at even strength Foligno produces far less goals, he put up half as many goals per 60 last year for example. As we know from contract stuff, goals are valued far higher than assists and Palmieri is a much much better goal scorer than Foligno at all strengths.

That isn't even going into the fact Palmieri produces like 3x more on the PP per 60 while getting pretty similar PP time the last 3 years (2.5-3 mins for Palmieri and 2.5 for Foligno).

Something tells me your angle would be way different if leafs grabbed Palmieri not Foligno

I literally posted a Foligno + Nash deal here weeks ago. Players that have been the defensive leaders in elite defensive usage for some of the better defensive teams in the league.

My angle has always been thus.


But yes you are right - Palmieri is clearly the better PP player. and has been moderately more productive at even strength (1.64p60 vs 1.42 at EV last 3yrs) in dramatically more offensive usage.
 

Rants Mulliniks

Registered User
Jun 22, 2008
23,071
6,135
Seems like a lot to pay, kind of surprising too as I thought Dubas didn't like rentals. Oh well, trust in Dubas I guess. And now we absolutely have to make it to the final, I mean we were favourites to take the division anyway without adding anyone so this is obviously done with the idea of going further than that so ... get to the final and it will be hard to complain. Don't make it that far and this trade won't look good.

He doesn't but bear in mind there is an expansion draft coming up.
 

tuckertowns

Registered User
Sep 5, 2009
73
69
YEG
McKenzie explicitly stated the Leafs didn’t want Hall. Even then, Hall was going to carry a $4M cap hit for any acquiring team. That would have severely limited the possibility of other moves.
Exactly. This point has not been mentioned enough. Even at 50% retention, that would of left us with little room to do anything else without trading a current roster player (Kerfoot). We've got Foligno, Rittich and I assume a depth defenseman by deadline. I'm ok with passing on Hall. We needed our bottom 6 to be tougher to play against and I think Foligno brings that. I'm pumped!
 

Ziggdiezan

Registered User
Apr 10, 2015
10,847
5,676
I literally posted a Foligno + Nash deal here weeks ago. Players that have been the defensive leaders in elite defensive usage for some of the better defensive teams in the league.

My angle has always been thus.
Okay but you just tried to make it seems like Foligno is a better producing player than Palmieri when he clearly isn't?

Saying you like him because he is a defensively responsible forward who adds grit/leadership is a fair take. Posting a bunch of offensive stats and then saying Foligno is better than Palmieri (inferring foligno is more productive) is not a fair take.

I don't think you would be trying to make the argument than Foligno is more productive than Palmieri if the leafs traded for Palmieri instead of Foligno.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kurtz

Rants Mulliniks

Registered User
Jun 22, 2008
23,071
6,135
The reaction of supposedly learned, nuanced posters clamoring for grit when we acquire an actual difference making physical two way forward

"But someone slightly better offensively went for less!"

LOL. It's like all the posters talking about how the Atlantic was weak and Toronto would never survive playing in the West, Toronto gets moved into a West division and produces their highest winning percentage in franchise history and now you hear "yeah well imagine if they had to play Tampa and Boston". Lulz. This place.
 

Cotton

Registered User
May 13, 2013
9,120
5,611
Or Dubas simply misread the market and undervalued what a 1st-2nd could get you.

You should probably refresh your memory on what a 1st-2nd can get you.

Goodrow got a 1st.
Skjei got a 1st.
Athanasiou got two 2nd’s
Pageau got a 1st/2nd and cond 3rd
Scandella got a 2nd/4th
Greene got a 2nd
Gusev got a 2nd/3rd
Johansson got a 2nd/4th
Montour got a 1st
Dzingle got two 2nds
Boyle got a 2nd

We paid a 2nd for Plekanec, we also got two 2nds for Roman Polak. A late 1st and a 4th for Foligno @ 75% retention isn’t odd. Nor was Dubas the only one tabling a 1st for NF.
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
Okay but you just tried to make it seems like Foligno is a better producing player than Palmieri when he clearly isn't?

Saying you like him because he is a defensively responsible forward who adds grit/leadership is a fair take. Posting a bunch of offensive stats and then saying Foligno is better than Palmieri (inferring foligno is more productive) is not a fair take.

I don't think you would be trying to make the argument than Foligno is more productive than Palmieri if the leafs traded for Palmieri instead of Foligno.

Given their usage, their even strength production is pretty much a wash, and Palmieri is offense-only while Foligno is defense-first - not just "defensively responsible' but elite defensively, the key defensive leader in all the toughest defensive situations on a team that has been one of the best defensive teams in hockey.

the stats i posted should have struck home pretty clearly - this defensive used forward is pretty much as effective offensively at evens as that offensive forward is.
 

Joey Hoser

Registered User
Jan 8, 2008
14,232
4,143
Guelph
You see a positive because there is a higher chance top 10 talents drops to the late 1st round because of less scouting means the draft order won't be as set. It is definitely playing the odds but there is more chance this year of getting a really good prospect in the late 1st round than a normal year.

The way I'm looking at it, is that if I think I have a good scouting staff, then I'm not getting the benefit of having a good scouting staff because they can't do any scouting. The results are going to be more random and uncontrolled, and I would prefer it if my scouting team could do their good work.
 

TheKule

Registered User
Jun 3, 2011
1,897
752
I would have preferred Palmieri, but very happy with Foligno. Serves a more pressing need, and didn't come with stinky Zajac.

A first is an overpay.
 

Ziggdiezan

Registered User
Apr 10, 2015
10,847
5,676
Given their usage, their even strength production is pretty much a wash, and Palmieri is offense-only while Foligno is defense-first - not just "defensively responsible' but elite defensively, the key defensive leader in all the toughest defensive situations on a team that has been one of the best defensive teams in hockey.

the stats i posted should have struck home pretty clearly - this defensive used forward is pretty much as effective offensively at evens as that offensive forward is.
Palmieri produced twice as many goals per 60 last year. That is not close to a wash. Goal scoring is worth way more as you said hundreds of times when Matthews signed his contract. Foligno numbers have also gotten progressively worse the last 3 years as you would expect for guys his age/style of play. How productive he was 3 years ago has little bearing on what he will produce now.

One of the reasons Foligno has such good defensive number is because of the system he plays in, he will put up far worse defensive numbers in Toronto's system and lets hope the other side of it happens though and he becomes more productive in a different system too.
 

mix1home

Registered User
Sep 29, 2009
2,819
850
Toronto,ON
Did anyone in the thread already said “overpayment”? Because I for one think that 1st is too much. Like the player and all, but he is not worth it imho.
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
Palmieri produced twice as many goals per 60 last year. That is not close to a wash. Goal scoring is worth way more as you said hundreds of times when Matthews signed his contract. Foligno numbers have also gotten progressively worse the last 3 years as you would expect for guys his age/style of play. How productive he was 3 years ago has little bearing on what he will produce now.

One of the reasons Foligno has such good defensive number is because of the system he plays in, he will put up far worse defensive numbers in Toronto's system and lets hope the other side of it happens though and he becomes more productive in a different system too.

Toronto has been far better defensively than Columbus this year, of course.

And Foligno was never a passenger on columbus - he led their forwards in ice time every year and every playoffs and took the hardest matchups game in and game out.

and still produced as well as offense-only palmieri.
 

Ziggdiezan

Registered User
Apr 10, 2015
10,847
5,676
The way I'm looking at it, is that if I think I have a good scouting staff, then I'm not getting the benefit of having a good scouting staff because they can't do any scouting. The results are going to be more random and uncontrolled, and I would prefer it if my scouting team could do their good work.
Ya but the last picks in the 1st round are usually pretty random anyways so the increased likelihood of getting a top 15 talent this year with that later pick would be a net positive in my mind. Everyone thinks differently though
 

Mulletman

Registered User
Feb 23, 2013
3,991
3,798
Ew Laine.
We have plenty of goal scorers. Why do you want another soft forward that's a liability in the defensive end?
Because Laine said he wanted to play for the Leafs before getting drafted in 2016. Winnipeg had no business drafting him. We should've had both the top 2 picks so we could've drafted both Matthews and Laine back then. Now would've been a perfect moment to correct that misfortune and set things right and it would've only cost a few picks to get the deal done.
 

Ziggdiezan

Registered User
Apr 10, 2015
10,847
5,676
Toronto has been far better defensively than Columbus this year, of course.

And Foligno was never a passenger on columbus - he led their forwards in ice time every year and every playoffs and took the hardest matchups game in and game out.

and still produced as well as offense-only palmieri.
We are talking the past 3 years and you just said Columbus was one of the best defensive teams in hockey so not sure what that first line adds? Edit: ah your trying to say his defensive numbers won't drop this year on Toronto. We will see on that.

But he hasn't produced as well... He has produced less and less the last 3 years while producing half as many goals as Palmieri last year. Saying he produces as well as Palmieri is purposely inaccurate.
 
Last edited:

JT AM da real deal

Registered User
Oct 4, 2018
12,157
7,451
Since Dubas has arrived Leafs draft strategy has been to draft skill regardless of size, and then trade for need in terms of size, grit, leadership etc in Foligno.

Some people scream to this day about Leafs giving up and wasting late 2nds for vet rentals for Tomas Plekanec or Brian Boyle, for playoff runs help.

So when you then deal your 1st round pick for an aging rental player to obtain those traits you refuse to draft, or higher costs than have been frown upon in he past, then how does one square that if the cost is the same or more?

Under these pandemic rules our Leafs are never going to get a better opportunity at the Stanley Cup when you only need to beat 6 X CDN teams to make it to the final 4 then and 2 of 24 USA based ones at the Cup. If there was ever a year to go All-in then this is the one so perhaps that was a major management decision factor in the risk vs reward to help explain the sacrifice.. Lets just hope Leafs picked the right player in Foligno to do that, compared to the cost and availability of other players at this TD.
They did ... Foligno was always a leaf fan growing up in Sudbury ... i played up there a few seasons ... half town is French Habs and half town is English Leafs ... only town where both types get along well too ... i guess da drinking takes care of that .. never been more wasted as my time up there
 

Guy Boucher

Registered User
Oct 22, 2008
4,625
1,013
I've tried watching some Columbus film and focus on #71. I'm...not impressed.

I will say they've played him a fair bit at C, so he's been hanging back rather than forechecking. But his mobility isn't great. I don't know. I hope I'm wrong.
 

napoleon in rags

Fred's dead, Baby... Fred's dead
Jun 17, 2009
2,828
1,609
St. Helena
Lots of talk about the value of late first round picks. I was curious about the type of players that have been picked over the last 15 or so years in the late first round. I arbitrarily used a cutoff of pick #25 and lower in the first round back to 2006, the year, ironically, in which Foligno was selected at #28.

Lots of duds but definitely some gems, e.g. Pasternak, Foligno, Berglund, Perron, Carlson, Palmieri, Ennis, B. Smith, Nelson, Coyle, Kuznetsov, Rakell, Namestnikov.

Using the 5 years from 2010 to 2006, the thirty players picked from 25-30 have played a total of 7,945 games; an average of 318 games. Games played, however, is asymmetric and skewed, so median is a better indication of how many games one gets out of a typical 25-30/31 pick. The median amount of games played for 25-30 picks in the years 2006 - 2010 is 140 games. (It's been a long time since I've indulged in stats, so feel free to correct me, admonish me, etc.)

Is Foligno worth a late first rounder? I honestly don't know.

Num. Drafted By Player Pos Drafted From GP G A Pts PIM Last Season
2020
25Colorado Justin Barron D Halifax Mooseheads [QMJHL]
26St. Louis Jake Neighbours L Edmonton Oil Kings [WHL]
27Anaheim Jacob Perreault R Sarnia Sting [OHL]
28Ottawa Ridly Greig C Brandon Wheat Kings [WHL]
29Vegas Brendan Brisson F Chicago Steel [USHL]
30Dallas Mavrick Bourque C Shawinigan Cataractes [QMJHL]
31San Jose Ozzy Wiesblatt R Prince Albert Raiders [WHL]
2019
25Washington Connor McMichael C London Knights [OHL] 100022020-21
26Calgary Jakob Pelletier L Moncton Wildcats [QMJHL]
27Tampa Bay Nolan Foote L Kelowna Rockets [WHL]
28Carolina Ryan Suzuki C Barrie Colts [OHL]
29Anaheim Brayden Tracey L Moose Jaw Warriors [WHL]
30Boston John Beecher C U.S. National Development Team [USHL]
31Buffalo Ryan Johnson D Sioux Falls Stampede [USHL]
2018
25St. Louis Dominik Bokk L Vaxjo HC [SweHL]
26Ottawa Jacob Bernard-Docker D Okotoks Oilers [AJHL]
27Chicago Nicolas Beaudin D Drummondville Voltigeurs [QMJHL] 1523522020-21
28NY Rangers Nils Lundkvist D Lulea HF [SweHL]
29Toronto Rasmus Sandin D Soo Greyhounds [OHL] 29189102020-21
30Detroit Joe Veleno C Drummondville Voltigeurs [QMJHL]
31Washington Alexander Alexeyev D Red Deer Rebels [WHL]
2017
25Montreal Ryan Poehling C St. Cloud State [NCHC] 2841542019-20
26Dallas Jake Oettinger G Boston University [H-East] 2001122020-21
27Philadelphia Morgan Frost C Soo Greyhounds [OHL] 2225742020-21
28Ottawa Shane Bowers C Waterloo Black Hawks [USHL]
29Chicago Henri Jokiharju D Portland Winterhawks [WHL] 13872633502020-21
30Nashville Eeli Tolvanen R Sioux City Musketeers [USHL] 3811102142020-21
31St. Louis Klim Kostin C Moscow Dynamo [KHL] 410102019-20
2016
25Dallas Riley Tufte L Fargo Force [USHL]
26St. Louis Tage Thompson R U. of Connecticut [H-East] 130141428422020-21
27Tampa Bay Brett Howden C Moose Jaw Warriors [WHL] 168163147532020-21
28Washington Lucas Johansen D Kelowna Rockets [WHL]
29Boston Trent Frederic C U.S. National Development Team [USHL] 53415702020-21
30Anaheim Sam Steel C Regina Pats [WHL] 118162743342020-21
2015
25Winnipeg Jack Roslovic C U.S. National Development Team [USHL] 215346195282020-21
26Montreal Noah Juulsen D Everett Silvertips [WHL] 48268102020-21
27Anaheim Jacob Larsson D Frolunda Jrs. (Sweden) 14821719402020-21
28NY Islanders Anthony Beauvillier L Shawinigan Cataractes [QMJHL] 3197468142572020-21
29Columbus Gabriel Carlsson D Linkopings Jrs. (Sweden) 36156122020-21
30Arizona Nick Merkley R Kelowna Rockets [WHL] 2035842020-21
2014
25Boston David Pastrnak R Sodertalje SK [Swe-1] 4221962154111892020-21
26Montreal Nikita Scherbak R Saskatoon Blades [WHL] 37628102018-19
27San Jose Nikolay Goldobin R Sarnia Sting [OHL] 125192746242019-20
28NY Islanders Josh Ho-Sang R Windsor Spitfires [OHL] 5371724202018-19
29Los Angeles Adrian Kempe C MODO Hockey Ornskoldsvik [SweHL] 29654711251522020-21
30New Jersey John Quenneville C Brandon Wheat Kings [WHL] 4223562019-20
2013
25Montreal Michael McCarron R U.S. National Development Team [USHL] 742681262020-21
26Anaheim Shea Theodore D Seattle Thunderbirds [WHL] 301421171591012020-21
27Columbus Marko Dano C Bratislava Slovan [KHL] 141192645492019-20
28Calgary Morgan Klimchuk L Regina Pats [WHL] 100002017-18
29Dallas Jason Dickinson C Guelph Storm [OHL] 206233558582020-21
30Chicago Ryan Hartman R Plymouth Whalers [OHL] 34957691263122020-21
2012
25St. Louis Jordan Schmaltz D Green Bay Gamblers [USHL] 42055122018-19
26Vancouver Brendan Gaunce C Belleville Bulls [OHL] 11861016472019-20
27Phoenix Henrik Samuelsson C Edmonton Oil Kings [WHL] 300022014-15
28NY Rangers Brady Skjei D U.S. National Development Team [USHL] 35426941201982020-21
29New Jersey Stefan Matteau L U.S. National Development Team [USHL] 815510392020-21
30Los Angeles Tanner Pearson L Barrie Colts [OHL] 4901141122261562020-21
2011
25Toronto Stuart Percy D Mississauga St. Michael's Majors [OHL] 1203322015-16
26Chicago Phillip Danault C Victoriaville Tigres [QMJHL] 377541411951722020-21
27Tampa Bay Vladislav Namestnikov C London Knights [OHL] 466891132022432020-21
28Minnesota Zack Phillips C Saint John Sea Dogs [QMJHL]
29Vancouver Nicklas Jensen R Oshawa Generals [OHL] 31336102016-17
30Anaheim Rickard Rakell L Plymouth Whalers [OHL] 4851361693051042020-21
2010
25Florida Quinton Howden C Moose Jaw Warriors [WHL] 9710717302016-17
26Washington Evgeny Kuznetsov C Chelyabinsk Traktor [KHL] 5111272834102582020-21
27Phoenix Mark Visentin G Niagara IceDogs [OHL] 100002013-14
28San Jose Charlie Coyle C South Shore Kings [EJHL] 6081141852992292020-21
29Anaheim Emerson Etem R Medicine Hat Tigers [WHL] 173222446302016-17
30NY Islanders Brock Nelson C Warroad H.S. [Minn.] 5901651553202132020-21
2009
25Boston Jordan Caron R Rimouski Oceanic [QMJHL] 157121628782015-16
26Anaheim Kyle Palmieri R U.S. National Under-18 Team [Ind] 5981841723563062020-21
27Carolina Philippe Paradis L Shawinigan Cataractes [QMJHL]
28Chicago Dylan Olsen D Camrose Kodiaks [AJHL] 12451722362015-16
29Tampa Bay Carter Ashton R Lethbridge Hurricanes [WHL] 54033322014-15
30Pittsburgh Simon Despres D Saint John Sea Dogs [QMJHL] 193637431502016-17
2008
25Calgary Greg Nemisz C Windsor Spitfires [OHL] 1501102011-12
26Buffalo Tyler Ennis L Medicine Hat Tigers [WHL] 6411361863222082020-21
27Washington John Carlson D Indiana Ice [USHL] 7991153985132682020-21
28Phoenix Viktor Tikhonov L Cherepovets Severstal [Russia] 111111122402015-16
29Atlanta Daultan Leveille C St. Catharines Falcons [GHJHL]
30Detroit Tom McCollum G Guelph Storm [OHL] 300002014-15
2007
25Vancouver Patrick White C Tri-City Storm [USHL]
26St. Louis David Perron L Lewiston MAINEiacs [QMJHL] 8912363545906682020-21
27Detroit Brendan Smith D St. Michael's Buzzers [OPJHL] 51227801075602020-21
28San Jose Nick Petrecki D Omaha Lancers [USHL] 100002012-13
29Ottawa Jim O'Brien C U. of Minnesota [WCHA] 778513162017-18
30Phoenix Nick Ross D Regina Pats [WHL]
2006
25St. Louis Patrik Berglund C Vasteras IK [Swe-1] 7171701563262482018-19
26Calgary Leland Irving G Everett Silvertips [WHL] 1301102012-13
27Dallas Ivan Vishnevskiy D Rouyn-Noranda Huskies [QMJHL] 502222009-10
28Ottawa Nick Foligno L Sudbury Wolves [OHL] 9502032794827652020-21
29Phoenix Chris Summers D US National Under 18 Team 70279512015-16
30New Jersey Matt Corrente D Saginaw Spirit [OHL] 34066682010-11
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
 

Confucius

There is no try, Just do
Feb 8, 2009
22,206
7,147
Toronto
Because Laine said he wanted to play for the Leafs before getting drafted in 2016. Winnipeg had no business drafting him. We should've had both the top 2 picks so we could've drafted both Matthews and Laine back then. Now would've been a perfect moment to correct that misfortune and set things right and it would've only cost a few picks to get the deal done.
His qualifying offer is 7.5, then we would have 5 guys pushing 50 million. lol. Not to mention we cant have a guy that just shoots. It would only be a game or two when other players start shirking the hard unappreciated work. Points are all that matters: not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad