Kelly
Registered User
- Nov 12, 2012
- 14,900
- 7,483
That's a really lazy way of going about things.Yeah and obviously D>W
Is, for say, Rielly/Trouba > P. Kane?
Either way, Werenski is a real good player, but I prefer Marner.
That's a really lazy way of going about things.Yeah and obviously D>W
Eberle maybe. Though in an interview Lou said he was assessing the team this season so it's hard to say.
Eberle maybe. Though in an interview Lou said he was assessing the team this season so it's hard to say.
If Rielly or Trouba would be elite, then yeah.That's a really lazy way of going about things.
Is, for say, Rielly/Trouba > P. Kane?
Either way, Werenski is a real good player, but I prefer Marner.
Doesn't matter.Jones > Marner
I actually am.
For sure he is but he also shoots left which is not what we need with Rielly / Gardiner / Dermott on the roster already and Babcock anal about his pairings
Isles just lost 70-80 pts with Tavares leaving
Wahlstrom is likely a yr away and Bellows just turning pro.
I think we are more likely to see Brock Nelson moved then Eberle at this point. Eberle has terrific chemistry with Barzal.
You know him?Dubas would buy a jet, learn to fly it and fly marner to Ohio himself if CBJ would trade Werenski for him one for one.
Isles just lost 70-80 pts with Tavares leaving
Wahlstrom is likely a yr away and Bellows just turning pro.
I think we are more likely to see Brock Nelson moved then Eberle at this point. Eberle has terrific chemistry with Barzal.
On the flip side we are short on a center so if somebody like Wennberg is available have to go for it even if it opens up a hole on our right side(my guess though is Columbus is not as open to trading Wennberg as the person who wrote this post is). In terms of prospects we also have better RW depth then center depth
The only way Wenny becomes available is for an upgrade at center, not for a top 6 RW of which they have three currently on the roster.