MXD
Original #4
- Oct 27, 2005
- 50,815
- 16,549
It's not unique to this particular list - recognition for still-active players has always lagged a few years behind on HOH
Actually, I was trying to be funny, in a 1+1=2 sort of way.
It's not unique to this particular list - recognition for still-active players has always lagged a few years behind on HOH
Let’s not focus on Malkin and Lindros but instead players like Brad Park... who I will probably leave unranked on my ballot again.
One minor correction.
Not necessary if certain posters fact checked before submitting their comments.
Milt Schmidt DID PLAY HOCKEY FOR THE RCAF BASED IN OTTAWA.
Milt Schmidt - Wikipedia
To be sure. I have specific memory of your previous mention on the topic- and this, too, can be cross-referenced by reviewing the relevant posts from the "Centers" project- which happily survived the migration complete.Only briefly. I met Milt Schmidt a few years ago. He told me himself that the fans booed him so much when he played for the RCAF that he quit and never played again for the remainder of his service,
Only briefly. I met Milt Schmidt a few years ago. He told me himself that the fans booed him so much when he played for the RCAF that he quit and never played again for the remainder of his service,
Schmidt... where the **** is Cowley?
(I know, I know... not 120th worthy because he admitted he didn't backcheck.)
Now I'm a Reggie Leach appreciator and all that, but c'mon. Boom-Boom was a stand-alone super star in his own right. The second player ever to score 50 goals, Hart, Art Ross, playoff excellence.Overall marginally better or important than Reggie Leach.
Now I'm a Reggie Leach appreciator and all that, but c'mon. Boom-Boom was a stand-alone super star in his own right. The second player ever to score 50 goals, Hart, Art Ross, playoff excellence.
Now I'm a Reggie Leach appreciator and all that, but c'mon. Boom-Boom was a stand-alone super star in his own right. The second player ever to score 50 goals, Hart, Art Ross, playoff excellence.
Not that huge of a Lindros guy, I guess.
After watching both of their careers from start to finish, during their peak/prime (of which I hold much value, since that is what ultimately defines just how good the player was) Lindros was more dominant. It's very unfortunate that Lindros was made of glass, but whatever.
...Big E hasn't come up for votes yet, so it's time to give 'im a rest for now.
My very early take:
1 & 2. Syl Apps Sr & Brad Park
3/4/5. Milt Schmidt, Paul Coffey , Henri Richard
6/7/8. Peter Forsberg , Bernie Geofrion , Vladislav Tretiak
9/10/ Ken Dryden, Pierre Pilote
My 1st 2 choices most likely won't change.
Schmidt is a favorite of mine, but not sure if he can be Coffey's offense & Richard's strong 2 way play.
Forsberg & Geoffrion will most likely be fighting it out for 6th & 7th, with Tretiak 8th
Dryden is a product of his team & Pilote I have change my mind on and think that It's a bit early for him.
Henri Richard should rank higher than Milt Schmidt. They were both great defensive players with fairly similar stats. But we KNOW Henri Richard rarely played on the PP. While we merely SUSPECT Schmidt had SOME seasons that he didn't play much on the powerplay.
Schmidt's Kraut Line absolutely had to be playing on the top PP in 1939-40 when Schmidt won the Art Ross, as his line finished 1-2-3 in NHL scoring. And after the war, Cowley had left. IMO, that more than makes up for the small edge Schmidt has in 7 year VsX
Schmidt on the PP, overpass offers some insight.
Top-100 Hockey Players of All-Time - Round 2, Vote 10
Part of the equation is post WWII,
the Bruins lacked "natural" scorers. Lacked a point blaster until Doug Mohns developed.
^^Didn't they have the first point blaster manning their blueline^^?
(I might be wrong here)
Could you repost on this page please?Good catch - yes, I posted the numbers for Syl Apps Jr accidentally. I updated the table.