TML Penalty Kill - Better or Worse?

Commander Clueless

Hiya, hiya. Pleased to meetcha.
Sep 10, 2008
15,307
3,036
Well Santorelli can kill 'em, apparently, so there's that.


I still feel like personnel wise we're even at best, if not slightly worse.

It's all up to the new special teams coach and Big Randy himself. No pressure.
 

Atomos2

Registered User
Jun 28, 2012
16,507
2,747
Toronto, Ontario
Well Santorelli can kill 'em, apparently, so there's that.


I still feel like personnel wise we're even at best, if not slightly worse.

It's all up to the new special teams coach and Big Randy himself. No pressure.

So would you be ok with Santorelli taking Mcclement's spot on the PK. Would that make us better? (I'm not disagreeing, I'm just curious what Leaf nation thinks. Remember, Mcclement played the most PK time among NHL forwards)
 

Bomber0104

Registered User
Apr 8, 2007
15,056
6,903
Burlington
Komarov is a very good penalty killer but so was Kulemin. In fact, two years ago they were often paired together.

Robidas is a good penalty killer but so was Gunnarsson.

Santorelli (I haven't seen much of him, I admit) I will assume is a capable penalty killer but so was McClement.

I'm undecided at this point.

The less we see of bird-brain Phaneuf in basically every area of the game (ES, PP, PK) the better off we will be.

Here's hoping Polak can sway the balance for us...for the better.
 

GordieHoweHatTrick

Registered User
Sep 20, 2009
16,461
280
Toronto
Gunnarsson and Phaneuf were pretty poor on the PK so we'll see how much of that had to do with Gunnarsson or how much it has to do with Phaneuf. Gunnarsson struggled to overpower guys but Phaneuf struggles positionally and you need two guys sound in both aspects imo
 

Ricky Bobby

Registered User
Aug 31, 2008
8,457
312
Komarov is a very good penalty killer but so was Kulemin. In fact, two years ago they were often paired together.

Robidas is a good penalty killer but so was Gunnarsson.

Santorelli (I haven't seen much of him, I admit) I will assume is a capable penalty killer but so was McClement.

I'm undecided at this point.

The less we see of bird-brain Phaneuf in basically every area of the game (ES, PP, PK) the better off we will be.

Here's hoping Polak can sway the balance for us...for the better.

Gunnarson wasn't a very good PKer. A lot of the problem with Phaneuf on the PK is that he shots left and should have been on that side but was forced to play the right side.

Having Polak will ensure Franson isn't averaging a 1:44 on the PK. Franson was downright awful on the PK.
 

Bomber0104

Registered User
Apr 8, 2007
15,056
6,903
Burlington
Gunnarson wasn't a very good PKer. A lot of the problem with Phaneuf on the PK is that he shots left and should have been on that side but was forced to play the right side.

Having Polak will ensure Franson isn't averaging a 1:44 on the PK. Franson was downright awful on the PK.

Disagree. Gunnarsson played with a brain whereas Phaneuf would get caught snoozing time after time.

Notice how Gunnarsson is already being talked about to occupy top 4 minutes for St Louis?

Why wasn't Polak used there?

Riddle me that.
 

Atomos2

Registered User
Jun 28, 2012
16,507
2,747
Toronto, Ontario
Gunnarson wasn't a very good PKer. A lot of the problem with Phaneuf on the PK is that he shots left and should have been on that side but was forced to play the right side.

Having Polak will ensure Franson isn't averaging a 1:44 on the PK. Franson was downright awful on the PK.

Franson shouldn't even be on this team.


PK isn't a big deal. Team defense is. You can win with a bad pk if your overall 5x5 is great

Check the correlation between our PK and us making the playoffs.
 

Tyler Biggs*

Guest
Komarov is great on the PK and was a big part of our third line when he was here.
 

Frelimo

Registered User
Jul 6, 2012
881
69
Toronto
Disagree. Gunnarsson played with a brain whereas Phaneuf would get caught snoozing time after time.

Notice how Gunnarsson is already being talked about to occupy top 4 minutes for St Louis?

Why wasn't Polak used there?

Riddle me that
.

Alex Pietrangelo
Kevin Shattenkirk

Have you heard of them? They're both pretty good, and were both ahead of Polak on the right side. Gunnarsson plays on the left.
 

rrc1967

Registered User
Jan 9, 2014
2,290
6
Houston Texas
I understand it is early and that there will probably be more changes coming. When that time comes we can bump up this thread and revise and assess the pk lines.

Assume systems don't change next year (which they should), then it certainly doesn't look like how it improved much.

the leafs don't have what i'd call a good / experienced defensive zone faceoff center anymore now that they lost McClemant. Santorelli certainly isn't it.
 

The_Chosen_One

Registered User
Jul 4, 2006
6,285
27
Melbourne, Australia
Alex Pietrangelo
Kevin Shattenkirk

Have you heard of them? They're both pretty good, and were both ahead of Polak on the right side. Gunnarsson plays on the left.
Shattenkirk is piss-poor defensively, though. Polak alone should be able to substantially strength our PK kill. He's physical and plays with intensity. The the of stay-at-home defenceman who can clear the puck.

The idea that Gunnarsson and the rest actually played well is hilarious seeing that our performance in this area was horrendous. Even Robidas was used extensively on the PK unit in Dallas so we'll have someone more capable than Franson on the second unit.
 

rrc1967

Registered User
Jan 9, 2014
2,290
6
Houston Texas
PK isn't a big deal. Team defense is. You can win with a bad pk if your overall 5x5 is great

doing some quick looking - only 2 of the top 10 PK teams missed the playoffs.

6 out of the bottom 10 missed.

I don't know about you - but odds are certainly not in your favor if you have a bad PK, that you have a playoff spot.
 

Duke Silver

Truce?
Jun 4, 2008
8,610
1,942
Toronto/St. John's
Biggest weakness to fix: 28th overall penalty kill; 2nd overall the year before while making the playoffs; Komarov was a big part of that penalty kill; Polak will help it too; big shot blocker.

Not really.

Player | Team | SHTOI | PPGA | PPGA/SHTOI | PPGA Per 60SHTOI
James van Riemsdyk | TOR | 57 | 1 | 0.018 | 1.05
Jay McClement | TOR | 176 | 11 | 0.063 | 3.75
Tyler Bozak | TOR | 76 | 5 | 0.066 | 3.95
Leo Komarov | TOR | 76 | 7 | 0.092 | 5.53
Nikolai Kulemin | TOR | 105 | 11 | 0.105 | 6.29

Here's a fun fact everyone: Over the last two seasons, Bozak is a better penalty killer than McClement. As is JVR in his limited usage (174 mins over two seasons).
 

LeafsNation149

Registered User
Feb 4, 2013
7,354
1,194
McClement was so overrated on the PK last year, yes he was good but he was a 4th liner that doesnt mean you put him on for the whole 2 mins. Just cuz he was overused by the guy that can't run a toaster doesnt make him a god on the PK, they are better off without him.
 

Teeder9

Free rent for Mo?
Oct 14, 2011
7,537
3
Ontario
doing some quick looking - only 2 of the top 10 PK teams missed the playoffs.

6 out of the bottom 10 missed.

I don't know about you - but odds are certainly not in your favor if you have a bad PK, that you have a playoff spot.

Obviously it isn't an absolute, but the fact 4 of the worst 10 teams made the playoffs means you can, and 3 of the top 10 missed meaning that is also possible. Even the worst team gave up less than a goal a game on the PP. We were -13 on special teams. Detroit, which beat us for the last playoff spot was -2. 11 goals on special teams wasn't the reason. The other -28 compared to them EV probably had more to do with that. We fix our EV GA and the PK will either follow suit or not matter half as much
 

Teeder9

Free rent for Mo?
Oct 14, 2011
7,537
3
Ontario
Not really.

Player | Team | SHTOI | PPGA | PPGA/SHTOI | PPGA Per 60SHTOI
James van Riemsdyk | TOR | 57 | 1 | 0.018 | 1.05
Jay McClement | TOR | 176 | 11 | 0.063 | 3.75
Tyler Bozak | TOR | 76 | 5 | 0.066 | 3.95
Leo Komarov | TOR | 76 | 7 | 0.092 | 5.53
Nikolai Kulemin | TOR | 105 | 11 | 0.105 | 6.29

Here's a fun fact everyone: Over the last two seasons, Bozak is a better penalty killer than McClement. As is JVR in his limited usage (174 mins over two seasons).

Explain that to me because if JVR is better in limited time, how is Bozak also better. It seems to me like that table is saying McClement gives up less PPGA per 60 minutes than Bozak
 

Frelimo

Registered User
Jul 6, 2012
881
69
Toronto
Not really.

Player | Team | SHTOI | PPGA | PPGA/SHTOI | PPGA Per 60SHTOI
James van Riemsdyk | TOR | 57 | 1 | 0.018 | 1.05
Jay McClement | TOR | 176 | 11 | 0.063 | 3.75
Tyler Bozak | TOR | 76 | 5 | 0.066 | 3.95
Leo Komarov | TOR | 76 | 7 | 0.092 | 5.53
Nikolai Kulemin | TOR | 105 | 11 | 0.105 | 6.29

Here's a fun fact everyone: Over the last two seasons, Bozak is a better penalty killer than McClement. As is JVR in his limited usage (174 mins over two seasons).

How is 3.95 PPGA Per 60SHTOI better than 3.75?
 

Tyler Biggs*

Guest
Disagree. Gunnarsson played with a brain whereas Phaneuf would get caught snoozing time after time.

Notice how Gunnarsson is already being talked about to occupy top 4 minutes for St Louis?

Why wasn't Polak used there?

Riddle me that.

Makes sense to me - Leafs were getting beat up and dominated below the red line and needed some strength and toughness - I'm fine with this trade but obviously not expecting too much.
 

Mess

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
86,969
11,978
Leafs Home Board
Not really.

Player | Team | SHTOI | PPGA | PPGA/SHTOI | PPGA Per 60SHTOI
James van Riemsdyk | TOR | 57 | 1 | 0.018 | 1.05
Jay McClement | TOR | 176 | 11 | 0.063 | 3.75
Tyler Bozak | TOR | 76 | 5 | 0.066 | 3.95
Leo Komarov | TOR | 76 | 7 | 0.092 | 5.53
Nikolai Kulemin | TOR | 105 | 11 | 0.105 | 6.29
Here's a fun fact everyone: Over the last two seasons, Bozak is a better penalty killer than McClement. As is JVR in his limited usage (174 mins over two seasons).

Interesting however I would suggest opponents 1st PP unit verses Leafs 1st PK unit and opponents 2nd PP unit verses Leafs 2 PK unit could be in play here.

QofC = If McClement and Kulemin are facing Crosby /Malkin on the 1st PP and PK and Bozak and JVR are facing Pens 2nd PP unit when Powerplay in ending.

This year whoever replaces McClement and Kulemin on the 1st PK verses opponents best PP players will determine if the PK% improves. Komarov is an obvious choice but the center that takes the draws will not be Kadri/Holland so that would leave Bozak or the new guys Kontiola/Santorelli?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Sydney Swans @ Hawthorn Hawks
    Sydney Swans @ Hawthorn Hawks
    Wagers: 6
    Staked: $6,201.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Inter Milan vs Torino
    Inter Milan vs Torino
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $1,447.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Metz vs Lille
    Metz vs Lille
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $220.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Cádiz vs Mallorca
    Cádiz vs Mallorca
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $240.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Bologna vs Udinese
    Bologna vs Udinese
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $265.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad