yukoner88
Registered User
I think what makes Hitchcock a great coach is that along with his hockey smarts he's a tremendous leader. He puts in the work to evolve as a coach, not just the x's and o's, but in leadership. He's the only person in the NHL who attends leadership institutes and apparently attends two every offseason. He doesn't view it as a duty, no one is forcing him to do it. He actually loves studying this stuff.
Imo a great example of his leadership is the way he viewed our goaltending. A lot of fans here quickly soured on Talbot, but not Hitchcock. When he arrived, yeah, Talbot was really struggling to get his 100th career win, but what does Hitchcock do? After nearly every game (including tonight's) he talks about our goaltending and says it's a strength of the team, that we have two good goalies. It's no surprise that Talbot has rebounded and Hitchcock was right.
Puljujarvi is another great example. Sure, he hasn't played as well as someone drafted in his position, but it's hard to excel based on the way he was handled. Imagine being Finnish, playing in a new country, and a bubblegum-chewing koala benches your ass even after a good game. Then here comes Hitch, he requests the AHL call-up so that he could take personal responsibility for your development, says that you're a big part of the team. It's a night and day difference. One guy wanted to get rid of you, the other wants to work with you. As I said in a different thread, if Puljujarvi doesn't take the next step forward with Hitch as his coach, I don't think he ever will.
Having someone who is 100% behind you can make a hell of a difference.
And to build on your goaltending point, he's got the players giving both goalies positive reinforcement in the media. Even though Koskinen has been winning games more consistently, they players keep repeating that they have 2 goalies they believe in. Hearing the support from his teammates has got to help Talbot's psyche as well