Well, sort of agree. A healthy Connolly in 2005-06 puts up about 75 points. Same in 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10. That's ~top 25 in scoring each season. If he's able to average that, with the "distractions" we think we know about, I can only imagine what he'd be like with some focus.
In 05-06 Connolly was on pace for 72pts (71.5 to be exact). That would have him at 44th in the league. He also did that as our secondary scoring center for the bulk of the season.
Oddly enough Derek Roy did play 3 full seasons as our #1 center after the co-captains left. He averaged 8ogms/73pts a year over those 3 years. Then he had his own injury issues impacted. No one would consider him a top 5 or top 10 player in the NHL based on that. So I’m not sure why Connolly should get that designation for something he
might have done if healthy. We also know Roy was hardly avoiding fun in his off time either.
The “dominant Connolly” existed for a very brief period during 05-06 playoffs before getting hurt. He was very good but was also doing it in sheltered role. The Hecht/Briere/Dumont line did the heavy lifting offensively and Roy/Drury/Grier did it defensively.
If Connolly was actually a our top center facing the toughest matchups AND had done what he did in those 7 playoff games over the course of a season (or even half a season). Then we could possibly talk about him being a top player in the game. But he never came close to doing something like that. Its a pretty big leap from what Connolly was to being one of the best in the game. The guy who did play at that level was Briere.