Corpuscle2
Registered User
- Dec 15, 2006
- 185
- 0
Its a close argument IMO. You can argue that TT had 4 elite years in a Boston uni. The
years to me would be 2008, 2009, 2011 & 2012. He was certainly the best in 2009 and 2011.
Guys like Orr, Espo & Newly were HOF locks. TT wont make the HOF. Big difference.
Yes, you can make that argument, and I happen to agree with the 4 year thing, with two caveats.
1) One of those years was an injury year, and;
2) In the injury year, the backup came in and led the league in GAA (lower than any Thomas put up) and had the 7th highest SV% in history. So how much of TT's numbers were him and how much were the system (and to be fair, you've got to be pretty good to put up better numbers than Rask in any system)
Comparing him to Orr is not tenable. Being arguably the best goalie for 4 years is not comparable to being arguably the best player in the history of the game for 8 years (And to most of us, there's no argument about Bobby).
Comparing him to Esposito and Neely is problematic. The first two years, TT was a very average goalie. He made some adjustments in the summer of 2007, got into much better shape (remember the yoga thing?), and then became "elite".
Esposito and Neely never had years with the Bruins where they were "average".