He's said to want a starting gig. And since thus is MAFs final season on his contract I guess the race is on. If greiss outplays MAF we might sign greiss and let MAF go. JR said he hopes greiss has the same kind of season khodobin had last season.
Yes, you can. Straight from the CBA:
13.2 The "Playing Season Waiver Period" shall begin on the twelfth (12th) day prior to the start of the Regular Season and end on the day following the last day of a Club's Playing Season.
In other words, waivers are only applicable from Sep 26 (my mistake, thought the season started on Oct 9 instead of Oct 8) through Apr ~11 (depending on the team). Any player sent down before or after that frame of time does not have to clear waivers to do so.
I really hope they let Fleury walk. He's going to want a longterm extension. We better not give him it.
Yep, best case scenario for Greiss is he proves to be starter quality and gets a 2 year deal as a cheap #1, bridging the way to Jarry. Would love to have a sub 4M goalie after Fleury is gone.
Yes, and it seems to me that at Greiss is a lock to be a solid back-up at the least.
Given that, I don't know why they didn't give him a multi-year deal, unless he didn't want one.
I'd imagine he's just hesitant to sign a multi-year deal anywhere because he doesn't want to lock himself into a backup role. He's looking for more and more playing time. A Coyotes beat reporter reported Greiss said this about signing here over Arizona or elsewhere.
Sarah McLellanVerified account @azc_mclellan
Greiss said the chance to play more was biggest deciding factor for him. Said he has to play well but, "I hope I get the chance there."
https://twitter.com/azc_mclellan/status/484029931270467584
I'm fine with giving Greiss sort of a mini-audition for the starting job. Maybe 30+ starts.
I'd be surprised if Fleury plays less than 60 games without an injury.
I'd be disappointed in the coaching staff if Fleury plays 60+ games with a healthy Greiss behind him.
This is the same type of signing as the Vokoun one. Both were brilliant, smart pickups of under-valued guys that we were able to get on great contracts. It is now up to the new coaching and scouting staffs to finally MOVE ON FROM MAF as the starter if Griess starts putting up similar (if not better) numbers. Shero made a great pickup with TV, but Bylsma didn't play him enough. Great idea, poor execution.....also is the title of my book about the Pens.
Even if he only puts up similar numbers as MAF, it is better to go with him as he will be a better value and is not proven to be a headcase in the playoffs. I'd be looking to move MAF ASAP once we have confidence in Griess.
Griess actually put in the 3rd best 5v5 SV% last year (1000 minutes min). He may surprise many here.
http://stats.hockeyanalysis.com/rat...0&teamid=0&type=shots&sort=ShPctA&sortdir=ASC
Greiss played 25 games last year and 19 games in 11-12. I doubt he came here so he could play less than that.
And if Thomas Greiss was in charge of picking our starting line-up, that would mean a whole lot more.
And if Thomas Greiss was in charge of picking our starting line-up, that would mean a whole lot more.
He couldn't possibly have been told he'll have more of an opportunity to get more starts here. Fleury's a pending UFA and proven playoff mental midget. It'd be silly not to see what he can do with a decent # of starts.
If anything, they'll want both goalies rested for the playoffs. That's what I've read every other sentence with management and coaching. It's about preparing for the playoffs. Who cares about Fleury's # of regular season starts but Fleury?
I'm sure he'll have the opportunity. But he'll need to play well enough to earn some extra starts.
Which is all we're saying. You don't guarantee Fleury has 60+ starts.