One win, and this forum has this team as heroes again.
what you don't ever seem to understand is that this is your attitude toward the Leafs. this is how you conclude that the Leafs are a good (or better than good?) team: wins. they win, therefore they are good. they made the playoffs last year, therefore Carlyle is a good coach, therefore the players he prefers over others are the correct players to prefer, therefore the guys who "fit" his system, fit in with the wildly successful Leafs, are the right guys to sign up long term. any indications that they aren't good can be dismissed on the grounds that they are winning games.
and sure enough when the Leafs were winning, many folks around here and around their mothers' basements, said they were overachieving. they were receiving otherworldly goaltending that it wasn't reasonable to expect to remain as strong through 82 games. they were being outplayed on most nights, outshot sometimes 2-1 in games, going 10-15 mins without managing a shot. and your response be something like: they are winning, "i'll take winning games over compiling stats any day." wins and losses are what matter, not some poolie's spreadsheet numbers.
so how come the inverse is not true? how come wins and losses are all that matter when they win, even when they don't seem to deserve to win, but when they lose you can point to bad calls, bad bounces, bad breaks, to try to explain it? people who do the same in wins - use stats or the eye test to argue that the Leafs are not really setting themselves up to be consistently successful with the way they play - are missing the point, because wins and losses are all that matter.
basing your opinion of a team solely on record almost makes it necessary to change your opinion of them throughout the season, to call guys heroes when they win and losers when they lose. if it doesn't matter if the Leafs consistently play poorly in games they win, why should it matter if they play well in games they lose? (not that they ever really play well in games they lose. maybe the first Boston game was a case like this.)