MXD
Original #4
- Oct 27, 2005
- 50,824
- 16,555
Yeah.. except Tampa is losing because they have a boatload of injured important players and also because Stamkos not wanting to be there is a huge distraction.
... eh... wait, what?!?!?!
Yeah.. except Tampa is losing because they have a boatload of injured important players and also because Stamkos not wanting to be there is a huge distraction.
... eh... wait, what?!?!?!
They are 6-4 in the last 10.
Montreal is 2-7-1.
Stamkos not wanting to be there anymore is like if Price was "liking" rumors sending him to Vancouver. MTL fans would go nuts, and it would also create a distraction.
Yeah.. except Tampa is losing because they have a boatload of injured important players and also because Stamkos not wanting to be there is a huge distraction.
Vigneault is better, always has been and always will be. I'd love to have him back, we re-hired the wrong guy.At the beginning of the season, if you had asked everyone, the teams that were supposed to be powerhouses in the east :
NYR
Mtl
TB
And Cooper/Vigneault were so much better than MT.
#MTwatch -
The only good thing about the injuries to Price and Gally is that if the team loses 10 in a row, MB will really be forced into firing our idiot coach.
#FireTherrien
I've had a ****** day, so that's contributing, but I'm sick of him. He's not going to change. He is what he is. He can do some good and has had a probably net positive impact on our team as far as growth, but he's holding the Habs back now. So I'm happy with how our guys like Pacioretty, Subban, Price and Gallagher have developed under him, but it's time for a new voice. Then guys like Galchenyuk will get even better. We need a new coach badly.
And that's the book on MT (see Pittsburgh).
Would Therrien survive a winless or 1-7 trip?
Exactly. That's not surprising. He's the kind of guy that fits an Edmonton type of team, but he has a short shelf life. He'll help them on the road to becoming a great team, but can't "finish the job" so to speak. Of course though, with regards to Edmonton, they have one of the best coaches in the league now. I'm speaking about Edmonton of past years.
Edmonton are showing signs of life with their current coach and woudn't touch MT with a ten foot pole.
Isn't that simply rephrasing what I said?
They have one of the best coaches in the league right now. I'm saying MT would have fit their team if they hadn't already signed a better coach.
Edmonton is doing great with their current coach, they wouldn't hire MT in place of McLellan
Edmonton is doing great with their current coach, they wouldn't hire Therrien in place of McLellan...though I wish we had.
What...? That's what I literally just reiterated!!!
McLellan >>>>>>>> Therrien
I'm saying that if TMac wasn't available and Therrien was, Therrien would have been an alright choice as a stopgap coach to develop the team. I'm just giving Edmonton (pre-McLellan) as an example.
Don't worry, I understood.