Lafleurs Guy
Guuuuuuuy!
- Jul 20, 2007
- 75,183
- 45,007
Cool.I did say they had one of the most expensive defense in the league. That is not an opinion , its a fact
Now go on and explain why all goalies are the same and why we collapsed?
Cool.I did say they had one of the most expensive defense in the league. That is not an opinion , its a fact
Cool.
Now go on and explain why all goalies are the same and why we collapsed?
Okay. Does this mean you acknowledge that goaltending matters?I did you just to want to listen. Price had 2-3 incredible seasons
Except Price was a lot more than just one or two seasons. He didn’t just get Vezina voting, he got Hart consideration.but to used those seasons to make it seems it was the case for his whole career its kind of disengenuous. It would be like saying Cheechoo was a superstar player because he scored 56 goals in one season
who cares about his injuries.DiPietro was constantly injured. He was a solid goalie whose career was ruined by injury. And he might be the best puckhandling goalie there’s been since Ron Hextall.
Injuries can happen to any player, they are not predictable.
So write him off. That’s fine. I didn’t count him as a success anyway. I marked him down as a guy whose career got ruined.who cares about his injuries.
The on ice product (which has nothing to do with injuries) was average at best.
Sorry, I know I read that somewhere but who were these picks again? My brain is currently fried so can't recall.So write him off. That’s fine. I didn’t count him as a success anyway. I marked him down as a guy whose career got ruined.
You’re still left with four HOFers out of six selections and another solid goalie who had a good career. The success rate is very high.
Since 1980:Sorry, I know I read that somewhere but who were these picks again? My brain is currently fried so can't recall.
Exactly.. people are making it sound like ughhh Reinbacher is like Tinordi. The dude is going to be a stud for us for 10 years... it's a great pick.Do you know how often the so-called safe pick turns out to not be safe at all. This type of language is usually used for players with limited offensive upside. They can’t play in the top6 or top 4, but they seem like they should be NHL3ers based on sone strange logic that usually doesn’t compute. If you’re skill set is lacking, it’s an a knock against the prospect, it’s not something that makes your chances better.
Having said that, Reinbacher has great tools, so he doesn’t really fall into the typical “safe” basket. He’s got loads of talent and If his offense develops a bit more we have a stud here.
Ahh, thanks. You are right, those are some incredible goalies. Don't recall who went before or after (besides prices draft), but taking them individually, they deserved being drafted very high (albeit, I think maf went #1... That may have been a stretch, but still deserves to be drafted very high).Since 1980:
Barrasso
Price
Luongo
MAF
Lehtonen
DiPietro
It's really easy to explain Cheechoo 56 goals seasons. You can explain it in two words. Joe Thornton. Maybe the best pure playmaker after Gretzky. It's debatable but his name should but up there.Like explaining Cheechoo 56 goals season. Like I said Price was on fire for 2 seasons. 2 seasons doesnt make a career does it?
How do you explain Price showing very average stats for the most part of his career? One season being extremely good is more an outlier compare to the rest of his career
Well it wouldn't be a 5th for a goalie. It would be a trade down of 10 spots for a goalie.No way i'm giving away a 5th overall for a goalie. No matter who that goalie is.
Absolutely I would have don't this deal. Askarov is a first round talent. Goes with his type of pedigree are the types of goalies that if everything hits, you don't worry about the position for a LONG time. Like we've had over the years.
The 15oa nets Sandin-Pelleka, Bonk or Barlow, Moore.. I'm happy to take any one of them + Askarov for Reinbacher (who I like). Next year the D class is much better, so to add a similar D in Bonk/ASP or FWD + a possible future #1G then get that D next season makes a lot of sense.
No for sure. David Reinbacher looks very very promising after all. Since the pick, I'm sold on his style of game. I think he have the same poise of Kaiden Guhle, same type of hockey, Guhle more physical, but Reinbacher have more offensive potential. (Guhle have good offensive potential aswell, just I see Reinbacher better at same age).
I would never trade Kaiden Guhle for that package, I'm a huge fan of Guhle, even before his draft year. So I would don't trade David Reinbacher aswell for that package, even it's looks like a very very good package (if you include the 24th overall pick aswell).
Once again, it was not a goalie for a 5th overall pick. It was a goalie for 10 draft spots.lol a 5th OA for a goalie in 2023 hockey . And the goalie in question has proved absolutely n othing in the nhl yet
The floor is McDonagh?I think the floor for him unless something goes wrong is probably McDonagh (ignoring the 2013-2014 season). The question mark is can he bring his offense to the next step to become a legit dominant number 1?
So Rein was a general consensus at 5 and we still complain and call incompetence to our our new management? Duh !!If our scouting staff could vouch for Askarov the way they did for Price, then yes, I would consider it. Other than that, I don't think spending a 5th OA pick on a goalie is a particularly good idea.
As a side note, Nashville's offer is a good indication of what an organization that's arguably the best in the NHL at identifying and developing defencemen thinks of Reinbacher. Because it is he they wanted to trade for, isn't it?
That 10 spot to move up was for Reinbacher at the end? Where is the goalie at 5?Once again, it was not a goalie for a 5th overall pick. It was a goalie for 10 draft spots.
That is a world of difference.
True. But I don't like Askarov enough to do it unless the 15th and 22nd pick were thrown in. It would be up to Nashvlle to make an offer too good to turn down.Once again, it was not a goalie for a 5th overall pick. It was a goalie for 10 draft spots.
That is a world of difference.
I wouldn't do it for 15 and 22.True. But I don't like Askarov enough to do it unless the 15th and 22nd pick were thrown in. It would be up to Nashvlle to make an offer too good to turn down.
I think the floor for him unless something goes wrong is probably McDonagh (ignoring the 2013-2014 season). The question mark is can he bring his offense to the next step to become a legit dominant number 1?
That's his ceiling, I think we undserstood. I'm more interrested in his ceiling.His floor is absolutely not one of the best defensemen in the league.