- Feb 5, 2010
- 20,776
- 9,615
He was barely managing earlier in the year but has gotten increasing worse.Out of curiosity; how has Hainsey looked this year?
He was barely managing earlier in the year but has gotten increasing worse.Out of curiosity; how has Hainsey looked this year?
Lol boedker is dog doo and hainsey is toastedThey have some intriguing UFA's that could bolster lineups. I like Name and Boedker for teams wanting to beef up their 3rd lines, Hainsey, Boro, and DeMelo in that order would also be great options to beef up a blueline. The big issue with Name and Boedker I imagine is the cap hit, and how so many teams are feeling it.
Hainsey and Boro are probably the big ones for me. In fact, I see Boro being the easiest to trade and having more interest than Pageau merely because the price tag won't be as high and the cap hit isn't big. He's the one guy of the ones I've listed (maybe Hainsey) that I think the Sens should do whatever it takes to keep though. What he did last year made him the heart of the franchise. Absolute leader on and off the ice, and that org needs people like that.
Lol boedker is dog doo and hainsey is toasted
He earns way too much for what he brings to the table. The Sens would have to add to get rid of him. He’s got negative valueEven though he's been scratched, I think Boedker is actually a nice add. He's not going to get much besides a conditional 7th or something, but I truthfully believe with his wheels he can still be a player. If he was waived or dealt someone would bite. He's just not a fit for the system he's playing in.
Hainsey is the perfect #6/#7 for a cup run. He's loved and respected by teammates, plays a good quiet game, very good on the PK, and has cup experience.
Ottawa protected themselves by choosing which year the pick was going to be from. Even if they weren't going to be able to replicate their playoff success, i wouldn't expect a team with Karlsson, Duchene, Stone, Hoffman, Chabot, Brassard, to be bottom 5 bad for two years in a row. I wasn't mad at all about the trade at the time, we even started that year pretty well before the trade was made (6-3-5) with the hope that the upgrade in Duchene would have certainly kept us out of the basement.There were tons of red flags suggesting it was an unsustainable run. I know hindsight is 20/20 but this was a huge topic of conversation at the time as well.
I really like Pageau but he is a risk. He has 2 ES points in his last 13 games. He had 29 points in 40 games up to the end of December. Since January he has 5 points in 15 games. The price a team pays could be based on a very hot first 4o but the guy you get is the real Pageau who, while definitely a valuable guy to have on your team, in most years would not be worth a first as a rental. Tack on the possibility of an inflated salary to potentially resign him and I think most teams may be a bit shy on getting burned at both ends here. Either giving too much as a pure rental, or potentially getting stuck with an inflated contract to keep him.Kinda surprised Pageau and Namestnikov allegedly aren't generating much interest. Both seem like the sort of reasonably priced middle-6 utility pieces that teams always love to add at the deadline. Maybe the asking prices are too high? Not willing enough to retain salary to make a deal fit?
The rest of the Sens deadline fodder...meh, i wouldn't be at all surprised to see limited interest and ultimately maybe a late round pick after teams strike out on other options on deadline day.