Why is it wrong to question the fact that he might be a bust due to injuries or inconsistent play? We aren't sold on his ability to consistently play in our top six. There is a reason players like Marty Havlat, or even in our own case Kris Letang are undervalued and its because it helps to contribute consistently. You can be the best player every game, but when you get your wrist broken on routine plays in every league, it should be a legitimate question whether or not this will effect his development.
It's not wrong. No one ever said it was wrong. I take objection to you and others misrepresenting the "pro Bennett" side with things like this:
"Bennett is Sid's future winger, brah. Our top six is legit and we are going to cake walk through our division."
Literally no one is saying that. Hence my comment that you are exaggerating.
Also, Bennett never broke his wrist and his first surgery was due to a sliced tendon from a skate. So that's one lie and another exaggeration.
I don't understand the Havlat and Letang points. Undervalued means that their value is actually higher than what people perceive. I thought you were trying to say that we are overvaluing Bennett. So which is it?