canuckfan75
Registered User
- Jan 14, 2014
- 2,369
- 885
These descriptions make Krueger sound like the anti-Benning. I would very much like to see a live-streamed conversation wherein they discuss management philosophy in sport.
This is the thing...What the Canucks need is a guy like Kruger to run the administration with an unwavering vision...He's enough of a big fish, that the Aqualini's should be completely hands off...(probably enough of a big fish that we won't land him anyway).Kruger is intelligent, a communicator, and an expert motivator. He seems like the perfect kind of person to manage a team and get everyone pulling in the right direction. I'd be stoked if we landed him as the team's president. I wager he'd be smart enough to charm Aquilini into letting him do his job.
Gillis is already 60 for comparison. Will be 61 in either Nov or Dec. can’t recall as I was looking up Holland as well who turns 64 around the same time but in a different month.will turn 60 in late August
This is the thing...What the Canucks need is a guy like Kruger to run the administration with an unwavering vision...He's enough of a big fish, that the Aqualini's should be completely hands off...(probably enough of a big fish that we won't land him anyway).
What a big joke it was for the Canucks to go the alumni route (Linden),where he was basically browbeaten into submission by the owners...So we can forget about people like Naslund,or the Sedins involvement in the front office.
Per TSN article it says that Southampton is playing out the season to avoid relegation.
Are they normally a team that is supposed to not be in that type of situation? Don’t follow European football.
Either Kruger or Lombardi would be a big win for the front office.
But I've always maintained that the #1 issue is Aquilini and until he quarantines himself I can't see a top shelf candidate coming here.
Kruger is intelligent, a communicator, and an expert motivator. He seems like the perfect kind of person to manage a team and get everyone pulling in the right direction. I'd be stoked if we landed him as the team's president. I wager he'd be smart enough to charm Aquilini into letting him do his job.
You can be the gm as long as it’s not benningI'm sold on that alone but quick question whose the GM then?
Per TSN article it says that Southampton is playing out the season to avoid relegation.
Are they normally a team that is supposed to not be in that type of situation? Don’t follow European football.
I'm still waiting for someone to actually explain why Krueger is a good candidate. Is he big on analytics? Does he take a progressive approach to management? I get what's happened in Southampton, but that's a different sport altogether.
I'm still waiting for someone to actually explain why Krueger is a good candidate. Is he big on analytics? Does he take a progressive approach to management? I get what's happened in Southampton, but that's a different sport altogether.
You didn't ask me, but I'd support ralph krueger for that role.
unfortunately southampton seem to be on the rise since hiring Hasenhuttl as manager. I don't think he'll leave now.
Can someone explain what the obsession with Krueger is? He's been with an EPL team for the past several years. Prior to that he was a solid coach, getting a good tournament out of the NHL U23's, and getting a decent season out of an awful Oilers team, but what has he done that makes people think he would be successful in an NHL front office?
If Krueger ever does get that opportunity to run an NHL team, he would return to his sport with a new understanding of how he would want things to work between himself, the GM and the coach.
“What I see as the ideal model now, is a really strong triangle, for me the triangle of the head coach, the general manager and the president in a professional sports organization. If you get three people that have different strengths to fill each other’s weaknesses, which we all have, and they work in unison toward a goal on a regular basis, that for me is the basis,” Krueger said. “It took me a few years to really get that right here.’’
Can someone explain what the obsession with Krueger is? He's been with an EPL team for the past several years. Prior to that he was a solid coach, getting a good tournament out of the NHL U23's, and getting a decent season out of an awful Oilers team, but what has he done that makes people think he would be successful in an NHL front office?
Main problem with Southampton is they sold van Dijk to Liverpool for almost 85 million euros and they can't find a good player to replace him. They are 5 points above relegation and they should save themselves, but they have to replace the head coach and find a centre-back and a right-back. And also get Guido Carrillo (loaned to Leganés) on track.Per TSN article it says that Southampton is playing out the season to avoid relegation.
Are they normally a team that is supposed to not be in that type of situation? Don’t follow European football.
Ok. I wanted to find out whether Southampton was meeting realistic expectations. If Kruger was doing such a great job seeing his team at risk for relegation would be alarming if it was not expected.Main problem with Southampton is they sold van Dijk to Liverpool for almost 85 million euros and they can't find a good player to replace him. They are 5 points above relegation and they should save themselves, but they have to replace the head coach and find a centre-back and a right-back. And also get Guido Carrillo (loaned to Leganés) on track.
I'm still waiting for someone to actually explain why Krueger is a good candidate. Is he big on analytics? Does he take a progressive approach to management? I get what's happened in Southampton, but that's a different sport altogether.
Ok. I wanted to find out whether Southampton was meeting realistic expectations. If Kruger was doing such a great job seeing his team at risk for relegation would be alarming if it was not expected.
So Southampton is like the Oakland A’s who have a low payroll trying to compete then?