Monctonscout
Monctonscout
- Jan 26, 2008
- 34,935
- 1
Actually, paying him 1 mill+ for 14 years isn't a bad deal.
I think us buying out Kaberle is a worse decision.
How is buying out Kaberle a bad decision?
Actually, paying him 1 mill+ for 14 years isn't a bad deal.
I think us buying out Kaberle is a worse decision.
How is buying out Kaberle a bad decision?
Not sure but I assume it's cause he only has 1 year left on his deal.
Anyways if the Habs don't use the money this summer they probably would have been better off keeping him and seeing next summer if another player became a buyout possibility
They are paying $1,642,857 for 14 years.Actually, paying him 1 mill+ for 14 years isn't a bad deal.
I think us buying out Kaberle is a worse decision.
Not sure but I assume it's cause he only has 1 year left on his deal.
Anyways if the Habs don't use the money this summer they probably would have been better off keeping him and seeing next summer if another player became a buyout possibility
Flyers GM and owner should be shot...brutal decision making on their part to give that clown that kind of contract...
Flyers GM and owner should be shot...brutal decision making on their part to give that clown that kind of contract...
And then trade Bobo...
Actually, paying him 1 mill+ for 14 years isn't a bad deal.
I think us buying out Kaberle is a worse decision.
Can't believe what I just read. I mean, are you serious? Every time you post something, it's tough to say if you're dumb or you don't know what you're talking about. And the fact that you can't say something positive about the Montreal Canadiens is ridiculous.
I see you didn't rebut/argue my points. Does that mean you don't have one?
As for saying positive things, you must be missing them because I always praise Gallagher, Gals, Prust, PK, Max, and Eller. After that, there really isn't anything to be excited about.
Maybe because your points don't contain any arguments? How buying out Kaberle is a worse decision?
Kaberle only has one year left. He actually is not a horrible player. I can live with him for one year. We have other guys who I wish were gone with multi years remaining:
Gorges
Deshairnes
We can use the $ saved on them to fill our needs.
Doesn't matter - well actually it does but that aside...It's not your money...
Kaberle only has one year left. He actually is not a horrible player. I can live with him for one year. We have other guys who I wish were gone with multi years remaining:
Gorges
Deshairnes
We can use the $ saved on them to fill our needs.
DD was signed under the new CBA, so I don't think you can buy himout...Gorges is a consideration though...after his brutal 48 game season...Kaberle only has one year left. He actually is not a horrible player. I can live with him for one year. We have other guys who I wish were gone with multi years remaining:
Gorges
Deshairnes
We can use the $ saved on them to fill our needs.
Kaberle only has one year left. He actually is not a horrible player. I can live with him for one year. We have other guys who I wish were gone with multi years remaining:
Gorges
Deshairnes
We can use the $ saved on them to fill our needs.
Agree with you on Kaberle, he was good enough to play bottom pairing and specialist. Buying out Gorges is a terrible idea, go find me a top 4 defensive dman and tell me how much we would save under 3.9. Desharnais can't be bought out so that is a non starter.
What we should have done is keep Kaberle and possibly make a trade that would net us a valuable asset in return for us buying out another teams bad contract. Kaberle wasn't bad enough to use a buyout on, I hope Bergevin starts making better moves because so far he has looked below average.
Actually, paying him 1 mill+ for 14 years isn't a bad deal.
I think us buying out Kaberle is a worse decision.
Kaberle and Markov on the roster are almost mutually exclusive and Markov is by far the better option.
Ya I know people say that but it is wrong, Kaberle is not as good as Markov defensively. Markov can play top 4 whereas Kaberle should be a bottom pairing player. This is like saying "Markov and Diaz are the same thing so we only need one."
You also missed the whole point of my post saying the buyout was more valuable than getting Kaberle off the books.
I'll be happy with the Kaberle buyout if they spend the cash on UFAs.
If they just try to lower payroll to boost profits, then that is a FU to the fans. The Habs should be spending to the cap every year.
I'll be amused if this turns into an O'Byrne situation, where we are crippled by injuries immediately after trading surplus dmen, and then g deplete our asset pool acquiring Paul mara, Brent sopel, etc.
Agree with you on Kaberle, he was good enough to play bottom pairing and specialist. Buying out Gorges is a terrible idea, go find me a top 4 defensive dman and tell me how much we would save under 3.9. Desharnais can't be bought out so that is a non starter.
What we should have done is keep Kaberle and possibly make a trade that would net us a valuable asset in return for us buying out another teams bad contract. Kaberle wasn't bad enough to use a buyout on, I hope Bergevin starts making better moves because so far he has looked below average.