Really? Why do you follow this team anymore? Does everything have to be negative before it even plays out?
Maybe the writer is trying to show some positive aspects of the future instead of being down in the dumps. Maybe.
Three things here:
1) I started my post by stating that I
really like the coach so far. How exactly is that a negative?
2) I simply provided proof that early success doesn't always = lasting success, and that it's worth keeping in mind what the goal here is. If the goal is long-term success, issuing too much praise for the short term can sometimes be a trap.
3) I even went out of my way to suggest that there wasn't really anthing wrong with the article, and that if there was a problem, it was with an over-zealous editor who provided a bit of a sensationalist title. Journalists don't get to title their articles, that's up to the department editor, and it's pretty common for writers to HATE the titles their articles end up adopting. If you have a problem with the fact that I'm simply pointing out a WELL established journalism trope, maybe you should take it up with the editors?
You're mis-interpreting pretty much everything I said, simply because you don't like the fact that I'm applying
cautious optimism instead of an immediate wholesale emotional investment, based solely on the fact that I didn't like the article's title, that the journalist didn't even write.
Did you even read the rest of what I wrote, or did you just see the three linked articles, and then completely ignore the context I was putting them in? At no point
ANYWHERE IN WHAT I WROTE did I criticize DJ Smith. Not even once. Not even slightly. Not as an insinuation, or a suggestion, or even a subtle hint.
I made a point about two things: 1) remembering to keep in mind the difference between short term success and long term success when making wholesale evaluations and finalizing opinions about things, and 2) that newspaper editors suck a lot of the time. Calm down, jeez.