Devils Trap
Registered User
Hey if they need Cap gone.. Sharp + Good Pick/Prospect for Cammy does it for me most likely
I dont want Cammy traded though.
I dont want Cammy traded though.
Hey if they need Cap gone.. Sharp + Good Pick/Prospect for Cammy does it for me most likely
I dont want Cammy traded though.
Sounds like it. Listening to TSN Toronto radio and the guys noted that it was wearing on Clarkson to be the salary albatross. Fresh start + less media scrutiny in Columbus (perhaps ironically, those were some of the things that Nathan Horton wanted when he signed there).
Unless Saad is coming back, trading Camm to Chicago is so stupendously counterproductive that it makes me want to punch myself in the balls.
But of course Chicago would never do that.
At this point he's probably glad to get out of the fishbowl now that he knows the grass isn't greener at home when home is Toronto
Trade Patrik to da Hawks for a #1
Now in before we turn around and trade our Jagr picks to Columbus for Clarkson.
I wouldn't touch that. Sharp is already declining and his contract expires after next season. 1st, Teravainen, and Bickell (for cap relief). That's still borderline.
I would do that . Love Patrik but a 1st in this years draft...
Imagine he is wishing he just stayed here.
Even worse. How the **** is this allowed? I really feel like I'm missing something.
Even worse. How the **** is this allowed? I really feel like I'm missing something.
The league is a joke. How is a player on LTR permitted to be traded? And the league had the nerve to punish the Devils. And for all the posters who claim only Toronto can afford to pay a player 6 million to stay at home I counter with the Rangers, Flyers and one or two other teams. Let's hope they fix this loophole.
Technically Buffalo traded for Kane on LTIR too and nobody batted an eye on that one. But yeah it doesn't really pass the eye test when the guy's practically next in line for Pronger's job at the NHL.
Yea but kane doesn't have a career ending injury and getting a spinal fusion
Right but if you just say you can't trade for a guy on LTIR where do you draw the line, how do you know besides common sense that someone on LTIR isn't going to play again when clearly the player himself isn't going to admit that. It's a little hard to find a boundary to legislate against this, though obviously there was no boundary with the Kovalchuk contract either.
Right but if you just say you can't trade for a guy on LTIR where do you draw the line, how do you know besides common sense that someone on LTIR isn't going to play again when clearly the player himself isn't going to admit that. It's a little hard to find a boundary to legislate against this, though obviously there was no boundary with the Kovalchuk contract either.
That's what bugs me. How is it allowed to move a guy on LTIR and everyone is pretty damn certain won't play again.
Where is the spiret of the CBA crap now?
Trade Patrik to da Hawks for a #1