LOGiK
Registered User
- Nov 14, 2007
- 18,319
- 9,042
Malkin?
For 1st (Carolina’s), 3rd (Dallas’), Deangelo and Gauthier?
So maybe a 3 or 4 team blockbuster trade that sends Malkin to NYR to center Laffie?
What do the penguins get back?
Malkin?
For 1st (Carolina’s), 3rd (Dallas’), Deangelo and Gauthier?
One of the concussions was. Two weren't.
Apparently NHL teams will have the doctor's report on him - and it's said to be comprehensive - so I guess we'll know a bit of what is in there by where he goes. But yeah, he feels like too big a risk for us. Ottawa with NYI's pick seems an obvious landing spot.
None of this is helping us cheer up Scandale though.
Hendrix Lapierre, not Lafreniere.
↑So maybe a 3 or 4 team blockbuster trade that sends Malkin to NYR to center Laffie?
What do the penguins get back?
↑
Malkin?^
For 1st (Carolina’s), 3rd (Dallas’), Deangelo and Gauthier?
I must have edited it while you responded.
I dont know anything about him honestly, just looking at the draft order by tsn and he's a relatively large human on d pretty high on the pick sheet.
Do the pens really have interest in offensive d men ... again? Nothing wrong with just a solid d man with mobility and for crying out loud.... puck moving abilities. They also just shouldn’t use a high pick on someone
High hockey iq would rate first for me. Size second and puck moving jostle between 2nd/3rd most important trait. Situation depending.
Would you guys be pissed if we picked Reichel 15th?
if the Pens project there’s no one with speed and great offensive IQ that they can get at #15, then they should give the pick to Minn...but absolutely do not take a player with a lower ceiling but who has a NHL body, or might be ready for the NHL sooner, at #15...total waste
I dont know anything about him honestly, just looking at the draft order by tsn and he's a relatively large human on d pretty high on the pick sheet.
Do the pens really have interest in offensive d men ... again? Nothing wrong with just a solid d man with mobility and for crying out loud.... puck moving abilities.
High hockey iq would rate first for me. Size second and puck moving jostle between 2nd/3rd most important trait. Situation depending.
Cool responses everyone. I was thinking more of the 12 year old fan that's already committed to saving up their allowance for a Lafreniere jersey, but I guess you could also just be bitter about it, haha.
The article made it sound like the first was a concussion where his neck was hurt and the following two were his neck, which you might have been saying. I’ve said I want JR to swing for the fences so I guess I couldn’t be too mad if they drafted Lapierre regardless of what happens... I still would be if it ended badly.
May just give it to Minny then.Would you guys be pissed if we picked Reichel 15th?
Honestly, I'd rather get IQ and skill than IQ and skating. A lot of them will fix the minor skating issues, a few will turn out to be burners... very few will develop notablymore skill.
Can we stop attributing a desire on Malkin’s part to be a #1 center somewhere else or to leave the Pens WHEN HE HAS SAID THE EXACT OPPOSITE? Why do people not listen to him or acsribe bad motives to him?
If we keep the pick I’m sitting back and hoping that Quinn or Jarvis makes it to 15.
If not I’d look hard at Braden Schneider or Connor Zary.
Those are the guys I like at this point.
I want to see him swing, but maybe not at that ball.
I think Perreault will be the biggest boom or bust going at 15OA - his scouting profile reads like Phil Kessel but with less skating and maybe a better shot, and maybe more inconsistent effort. Again, I'm not sure I want him to swing at that ball...
Yeah. I think, sometimes, that both all of us and the team itself have gotten too caught up in simply straight line speed.
I always defer to smarts and offensive tools. I mean... unless you skate like Hal Gill.
If you are a high-IQ player... you tend to SEEM a lot faster than you are because you are always taking efficient paths to the puck and are able to find/feel soft spots in the O-zone. A relatively "dumb" player who is a burner will often spend a lot of time just Konstantin Koltsov-ing around out there and never really accomplishing much.
I could talk myself into Lapierre. If they think he can be a 1C and won’t take a long time to develop, I think it becomes a more appealing risk. If the medical reports really are reassuring that could change things.
They won’t draft a Kessel clone, imo. It got too ridiculous towards the end and there’s the whole Sullivan and personality clashes fun. Even if Sullivan is gone by then I bet they’ll look at Kessel’s history and how coaches will snap, and they’ll avoid that risk over a health one.
Jabba the Madden, the super penis with a tested IQ lower then Jack Johnson's bank account does it on a daily basis, maybe not with just the Rangers, but the premise is the same.Why would any Pens fan suggest trading Malkin to NYR?
I'm not crazy high on Schneider to be honest.
He hasn't produced offensively to warrant a top 15 pick.
He's been a good physical defenseman, but that doesn't always translate from junior to pro hockey. There's a difference between roughing up junior players and men in the NHL. Going along with this, he's one of the oldest players in the draft with a September birthday.
I wouldn't be outraged if the Pens took him, but there will be better options at 15.
Because his entire career is in the shadow of sid?
That's gotta bother him to some level.
Me saying Malkin to Rangers is more fantasy drafting more than anything. I don't actually want him there.
I like his feet and athleticism in defending more so than his size or physicality. I would agree on production, I think he’s like a 25 to maybe 35 point guy in a good season. More importantly though, he can move the puck.
He’s not a sexy pick but I think he’s a solid 3-4D who could maybe deploy against top lines. Honestly similar to Marino. So I’d be more than happy to build around a right side of he and Marino going forward. That’s a rock solid foundation where along with Dumo, Petts and POJ— the 2-6D slots all have good players filling them. I just value that more than drafting a forward who prob fits into your middle six at his peak.
Age thing I don’t really care about, I think you could maybe say since it’s his 3rd year of junior it confirms he’s not a high point producer but to me a) you’re not drafting him to be that, and b) it’s a plus in that he can play in the AHL for his d+2.
Still, Jarvis is the guy I want in this draft.