The sharpest difference between Chicago and Edmonton's rebuilds is that Chicago built a young stable of great defensemen first. I don't see any reason to part with that strategy unless you win the trade so badly it's laughable. Put another way: in our position, we should value Myers more highly than almost any other team in the league would.
Thats not the difference between Chicago and Edmonton nor is it the "strategy" we've employed. The difference (between the Hawks and Oilers) is the fact that Hawks drafted, traded for and signed UFAs to put together the pieces of a well balanced team and prospect pool
The Hawks increased their odds of landing NHLers via the draft by having extra picks every draft year (except 2002) in the years leading up to drafting Toews then Kane. In 2004 alone they had 17 picks that included four 2nd rounders From 2001 to 2005 they had ten 2nd rounders with extra picks in various later rounds in several drafts. It led to them finding a decent amount of talent outside of the first round. Players like Keith, Crawford, Bolland, Bickell in the 2nd round. Goalie Craig Anderson in the 3rd rd, Hjarlmarsson in the 4th, Wizniewski in the 5th, Brouwer in the 7th and Byfuglien in the 8th rd.
There was no favoring or focus on dmen in their draft approach. It just turned out they found some good NHL dmen in the 2nd and later rounds. They also acquired via trade Sharp, Ladd, Vertseeg before they became the players we know them as and before Toews or Kane were drafted. Their free agent signings in the years before, during and right after Toews/Kane came on board were Havlat, Huet, Lang, Niemi, Campbell and Hossa. To point out just how important these non drafted players were to the Hawks emergence. Five of the top 8 scorers in their first playoff season post Toews/Kane drafts were trade acquisitions and free agent signings. Thats the difference between the Oilers and Hawks. The Oilers have done little outside of drafting top end offensive prospects. Not much success outside the 1st round. Nor have they had much success adding key players via trade or in free agency.
As for the Sabres and Myers, we've already acquired an amazing prospect pool with a lot of talent at all positions. We have a lot of high picks in the upcoming 2015 draft which is a deep one. We also have extra top picks in the drafts beyond 2015 and will probably be adding more picks in 2015 and beyond by the trade deadline. We are now in the phase when we can start using these assets (like Myers) to acquire pieces we may need or want. That said, I agree in Myers case it needs to be a very strong offer, overpayment really, to get him.