I want to move down 10-30 spots :[ and move up 10-30 spots with my 19(4)
pls
I mean, you could just name a player who hasn't been picked
Please don't penalize me for joking AoS!!
I want to move down 10-30 spots :[ and move up 10-30 spots with my 19(4)
pls
I could put both youngins on the bottom pair and just play them the barest minimum.(probably should've gone vet instead of Theodore, but I think he's the real deal)
Hiller and Ramo would've been good imo. But canuckking ruined that.
AoS has given more than enough warnings. I'm surprised it took this long for some punishment to be handed out IMO
And damn, now RandV is picking right between my back to back picks -_-
AoS has given more than enough warnings. I'm surprised it took this long for some punishment to be handed out IMO
And damn, now RandV is picking right between my back to back picks -_-
I was actually annoyed with the amount of warnings he gave out.... It's fair. I agree and aback the commish on this 100%.
de Haan and Burakovsky are available in a package
I'm willing to trade 17(10) to move down 30 spots max in exchange I just want 30 spots/however many I moved down with my 19(4) - this value is unheard of in this draft! A new precedent !
Seriously gonna hurl if I have to pick with my 17(10).
Can you post a video of u hurling when you pick?
It would be... Awesome!
I was actually annoyed with the amount of warnings he gave out.... It's fair. I agree and aback the commish on this 100%.
i agree w the general idea that you shouldn't mention players.
but voldemort is the one anomaly for me.
a lot of good d still left, i don't know what people are complaining about.. problem is they're 90% left sided lol
I'm glad you feel that way, because....I was actually annoyed with the amount of warnings he gave out.... It's fair. I agree and aback the commish on this 100%.
definitely... But how many gms do you think he'll play this yr?
Bieksa, Vatanen, Fowler, Despes, Lindholm, ******....
Then *****, *****.. As vets he has to beat out..
I was loving that run of rookie picks for that reason... Great potential player... But not this yr.
But voters will love the name.. Good pick for that reason..
I'm glad you feel that way, because....
Your next pick will be moved back 10 spots for mentioning players who have not been picked yet.
@Everyone: I don't care who the player is. If he is eligible to be picked in this game, do not talk about, mention or refer to him in this thread. I don't care how bad you think any player is, there are a lot of NHL players that won't get picked. Don't talk about them. Period. There will be no more discussion about this.
Looks like you moving RandV down 10 spots screwed up your list. Now RandV is listed at 14 and 24, so hopefully that gets fixed before the pick is in.
I was really confused for a minute there, when did I talk about an undrafted player? Then I was like ohhh right, I didn't even realize
However I never made a fuss but I don't agree with the first warning. I posted a link to a sorted list on generalfanager, thought that was generic enough.
This was your first "warning". I made several warnings to the group though. So much so that I pissed off DL by being pissed off.