- Aug 19, 2005
- 16,135
- 4,680
Ugly: The DoPS, as usual:
Yet my thirst for justice remains unquenched.
Ugly: The DoPS, as usual:
"A Player is considered a repeat offender for 18 months following his most recent incident that resulted in a suspension. His status as a repeat offender in this category is used to determine the amount of salary forfeited should he receive another suspension.So are these fines taken into consideration on future decisions on suspensions? Is it like getting points on your drivers license? I imagine they eventually suspend you if these keep piling up.
That's not accurate.
Risto has been playing well since the first game.
McCabe/Risto in game one vs Caps
CF% —-> 59%
SCF% —>88% (7 for/1 against)
HDCF% -> 100% (3 for/0 against)
GF% ——> 100% (2 for/0 against)
xGF% —-> 72%
That stat line can’t happen if Risto was playing bad.
It took him playing 3 good games and Sabres blowout win for him to start getting recognized for his good play. But all it took to get piled on in during the first game was getting stuck on the ice for that really crappy sequence from Montour. Which lead to goal against in game one. It wasn’t Risto’s fault but he starts getting piled on anyway and its continues the rest of that GDT.
Risto frequently can’t get a fair shake on this forum. That sentiment isn’t directed at you. Its a forum wide thing with a small example of it being the amount of posters agreeing with your take that he play bad in game one (based on the likes your post got)
Being on the ice for a goal isn't some automatic knock. That first goal IIRC there was an issue in front of the net that the pair can take responsibility for but the other goal you can't fault him on at all.Risto was on the ice for the first 2 goals against in game 1 against Wash. He looked lost. It was his normal bad defense. Then he woke up and has been playing well since then so you can probably say that Risto has been playing well since the end of the first period of game 1.
Risto was on the ice for the first 2 goals against in game 1 against Wash. He looked lost. It was his normal bad defense. Then he woke up and has been playing well since then so you can probably say that Risto has been playing well since the end of the first period of game 1.
Oh, one last bad...
An entire page or two of the GDT was filled with complaints about Risto after this play:
Really, this was Risto's fault?
Family member health / diagnosis, or perhaps a vehicular accident, etc., involving a family member.This does not sound promising. At all. I gotta think it's something to do either with his own long-term health (akin to Josh Harding diagnosed with MS) or an immediate family member's long-term health.
Indeed.The game was awesome. Total domination through discipline. I hope it lasts. When we’ve seen glimpses of play like this over the past few years it’s typically followed by a week of straight dogshit. So, fingers crossed.
I'll heap praise on the entire team effort. Broke out as a unit. Positioning and spacing was excellent. Gained the zone / attacked as a unit. The best cycling I've seen in years. Back-checked as a unit, supported their D in their own zone as a unit. Hutton had very few follow-up shots and no need for uncontrolled scrambles.As a nitpicker I don't have a single bad thing to say. That was awesome.
If we're going to nit pick, then:To me, it's completely obvious. Seeing 20, 15, 13 getting back in the defensive zone so quickly. I know Eakin has been rather anonymous the first few games, but he's always getting back into position. Rieder and Sheahan are soooo good defensively right now.
Really, the only forwards who have been continually sketchy getting back are the "big guns" -- Hall, Eichel and Skinner......but that's completely understandable. And I think it'll just take time between Hall and Eichel to figure out which one of them is more defensive and which one of them is ready for the breakout.
As an aside -- Olofsson looks noticeably more quick out there. He'll never be a speedster a la Eichel or Hall.......but it sure looks to me like he's gained a step.