Speculation: The Goalie Speculation Thread - Why Do Skaters Get All The Love?

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
56,142
35,257
Rochester, NY
He's a significant upgrade over Lehner and probably the cheapest option. I am sure we could give prospect + a 3rd rounder for him and keep our early 2nd.

It is far from a given that Grubauer will be an upgrade over Lehner.

They are the same age and Grubauer has less than half of the number of NHL games played as Lehner. And before the NHL, Lehner's best AHL season was better than Grubauer's best AHL season.

Grubauer could be an upgrade. Or, he could be a replacement or a step down.

Pretty much any goalie that they are likely to acquire will be a lottery ticket.

Just look at the numbers that Raanta and Talbot put up as Lundy's backup and then when they moved on to their next teams.

Any time you move on to a new goalie, it has a lot of risk/variability involved.
 

debaser66

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 10, 2012
4,838
2,598
It is far from a given that Grubauer will be an upgrade over Lehner.

They are the same age and Grubauer has less than half of the number of NHL games played as Lehner. And before the NHL, Lehner's best AHL season was better than Grubauer's best AHL season.

Grubauer could be an upgrade. Or, he could be a replacement or a step down.

Pretty much any goalie that they are likely to acquire will be a lottery ticket.

Just look at the numbers that Raanta and Talbot put up as Lundy's backup and then when they moved on to their next teams.

Any time you move on to a new goalie, it has a lot of risk/variability involved.
Not to mention that the Caps have a better defense.
I have a hard time giving up assets for goalies.
I ardently hope we draft one or sign a undrafted miracle from Europe the next few seasons.
Until then I would stick to UFA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Onry

Sabre the Win

Joke of a Franchise
Jun 27, 2013
12,268
4,956
It is far from a given that Grubauer will be an upgrade over Lehner.

They are the same age and Grubauer has less than half of the number of NHL games played as Lehner. And before the NHL, Lehner's best AHL season was better than Grubauer's best AHL season.

Grubauer could be an upgrade. Or, he could be a replacement or a step down.

Pretty much any goalie that they are likely to acquire will be a lottery ticket.

Just look at the numbers that Raanta and Talbot put up as Lundy's backup and then when they moved on to their next teams.

Any time you move on to a new goalie, it has a lot of risk/variability involved.
I am not sure you watch a goalie playing style. I was a huge advocate for Talbot over Lehner, I went to bat for Raanta and I have piled on Lehner since he was traded for and it turns out I was in the right for piling on Lehner because hes trash and always has been and you all got to see first it hand. One of these goalies is not like the other, Grubauer already plays with better positioning, more flexibility and can square his pad up against the post. I did a quick comparison of all season prior to last years since this site has tracked them.

SAVE.png
 

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
56,142
35,257
Rochester, NY
Not to mention that the Caps have a better defense.
I have a hard time giving up assets for goalies.
I ardently hope we draft one or sign a undrafted miracle from Europe the next few seasons.
Until then I would stick to UFA.

A kid they take in the draft is unlikely to make an impact at the NHL level for 5 years or more.

Ullmark was drafted six years ago and he has yet to be an NHL regular yet.
 

Reddawg

We're all mad here
Sponsor
Mar 22, 2007
9,030
4,725
Rochester, NY
A kid they take in the draft is unlikely to make an impact at the NHL level for 5 years or more.

Ullmark was drafted six years ago and he has yet to be an NHL regular yet.
Yup. Ryan Miller didn't become an NHL regular until his 7th year after being drafted.
 

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
56,142
35,257
Rochester, NY
I am not sure you watch a goalie playing style. I was a huge advocate for Talbot over Lehner, I went to bat for Raanta and I have piled on Lehner since he was traded for and it turns out I was in the right for piling on Lehner because hes trash and always has been and you all got to see first it hand. One of these goalies is not like the other, Grubauer already plays with better positioning, more flexibility and can square his pad up against the post. I did a quick comparison of all season prior to last years since this site has tracked them.

View attachment 119863

I have played goal and coached goalies.

I get why people want to move on from Lehner.

I also know that looking at a goalie that has never had to be a #1 is a huge projection.

Along with goalie production not being that consistent year to year.

And comparing Grubauer's stats behind the Caps and Lehner's stats behind the Sabres is just comparing apples to oranges. Especially with how things changed for the Sabres' goalies this season.

It wasn't just Lehner, look at CJ in 15/16 vs CJ in 17/18. His Save% dropped from .920 to .891.
 

Sabre the Win

Joke of a Franchise
Jun 27, 2013
12,268
4,956
I have played goal and coached goalies.

I get why people want to move on from Lehner.

I also know that looking at a goalie that has never had to be a #1 is a huge projection.

Along with goalie production not being that consistent year to year.

And comparing Grubauer's stats behind the Caps and Lehner's stats behind the Sabres is just comparing apples to oranges. Especially with how things changed for the Sabres' goalies this season.

It wasn't just Lehner, look at CJ in 15/16 vs CJ in 17/18. His Save% dropped from .920 to .891.
The only time Lehner benefited from a good season was in Bylsma's system. Less high danger saves to be made, most shots came from low scoring areas to the outside and he faced a lot and a lot of low danger shots but it showed in the shootouts his glaring weakness with positioning to tracking the puck in medium to high danger scoring areas. Granted this year defense was non existent because Housley wanted the defense to rush up allowing for more shots to be taken in those areas of weakness for Lehner and that went really against Lehner. However even if I judge him solely in Bylsma's system when he posted that .918 or was it .920? save pct season, Holtby or Grubauer would have looked even better in that system because they are just better goalies overall.
 

TehDoak

Chili that wants to be here
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
31,467
8,445
Will fix everything
Given the comments at the end of the season from Botterill, I expect Lehner to either be traded or not qualified. Ullmark is penciled in at the backup spot for sure.

I'm not really impressed by much on the market right now though. I also see 3 teams that need a starter (Carolina, Buffalo, NYI) and zero starters available. Grubaeur looks like best available. Maybe we get him since we aren't in Washington's division?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mittelstadt

Zip15

Registered User
Jun 3, 2009
28,121
5,401
Bodymore
I am not sure you watch a goalie playing style. I was a huge advocate for Talbot over Lehner, I went to bat for Raanta and I have piled on Lehner since he was traded for and it turns out I was in the right for piling on Lehner because hes trash and always has been and you all got to see first it hand. One of these goalies is not like the other, Grubauer already plays with better positioning, more flexibility and can square his pad up against the post. I did a quick comparison of all season prior to last years since this site has tracked them.

Cost notwithstanding, Lehner has been the better netminder since those trades. Not Lehner's fault that Murray made Chiarelli, of all GM's, look like a shrewd negotiator.


Do you have Darling's before and after his trade from Chicago? Because most people thought he was a lock to be a good starting goaltender once he was given the crease in Carolina. Not only was he terrible, he was right there with Johnson in the conversation for "worst regular goaltender in the NHL" during the 2017-18 season.

That's the point. You can't simply assume that Grubauer will be a .920+ guy when he enters this tire fire. If Buffalo wants to put a future 2nd on the table (preferably, SJ's when/if Kane doesn't re-sign there), I wouldn't care too much. I do not want them trading 32 for Grubauer.
 

littletonhockeycoach

NOT the Hanson Bros.....
Sponsor
Oct 26, 2008
16,028
11,489
Littleton, Co
To answer the original question......... it's the toughest position to play out of any of them. Physically, mentally, emotionally.

I'll never understand why my son became a goaltender. Except that he loves the pressure and the challenge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldgoalie

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
56,142
35,257
Rochester, NY
Given the comments at the end of the season from Botterill, I expect Lehner to either be traded or not qualified. Ullmark is penciled in at the backup spot for sure.

I'm not really impressed by much on the market right now though. I also see 3 teams that need a starter (Carolina, Buffalo, NYI) and zero starters available. Grubaeur looks like best available. Maybe we get him since we aren't in Washington's division?

I think St Louis is another interesting situation to watch.

Hutton outplayed Allen this season. But, Allen is signed long term and Hutton is set to be a UFA.

Personally, I'd rather go the UFA route with a guy like Lehtonen or Bernier than giving up assets for a guy like Grubauer who has never been a #1.
 

Zip15

Registered User
Jun 3, 2009
28,121
5,401
Bodymore
Given the comments at the end of the season from Botterill, I expect Lehner to either be traded or not qualified. Ullmark is penciled in at the backup spot for sure.

I'm not really impressed by much on the market right now though. I also see 3 teams that need a starter (Carolina, Buffalo, NYI) and zero starters available. Grubaeur looks like best available. Maybe we get him since we aren't in Washington's division?

I would add teams with soon-to-be UFA goaltenders who are just "meh":

Detroit (Howard a UFA after next season)
Colorado (Varly a UFA after next season)
Calgary (Smith a UFA after next season)
 

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
56,142
35,257
Rochester, NY
Another interesting potential target would be Keith Kinkaid.

He kept the Devils afloat when Schneider struggled this season.

But, Schneider has a long term, big money deal that includes a NTC and Kinkaid has one more year prior to becoming a UFA.

He would be another guy in that "lottery ticket" bucket and trading him would kind of be like when the Rangers traded Talbot.

But, I doubt that happens if the Devils are worried about Schneider.

:dunno:
 

Zip15

Registered User
Jun 3, 2009
28,121
5,401
Bodymore
Another interesting potential target would be Keith Kinkaid.

He kept the Devils afloat when Schneider struggled this season.

But, Schneider has a long term, big money deal that includes a NTC and Kinkaid has one more year prior to becoming a UFA.

He would be another guy in that "lottery ticket" bucket and trading him would kind of be like when the Rangers traded Talbot.

But, I doubt that happens if the Devils are worried about Schneider.

:dunno:

For the reasons you mentioned, I don't see them trading Kinkaid. He's proven to be a nice insurance policy if or when Schneider falters.

Kinkaid was my preferred backup last offseason, but the Devils re-signed him just before UFA.
 

Sabre the Win

Joke of a Franchise
Jun 27, 2013
12,268
4,956
Cost notwithstanding, Lehner has been the better netminder since those trades. Not Lehner's fault that Murray made Chiarelli, of all GM's, look like a shrewd negotiator.

Do you have Darling's before and after his trade from Chicago? Because most people thought he was a lock to be a good starting goaltender once he was given the crease in Carolina. Not only was he terrible, he was right there with Johnson in the conversation for "worst regular goaltender in the NHL" during the 2017-18 season.

That's the point. You can't simply assume that Grubauer will be a .920+ guy when he enters this tire fire. If Buffalo wants to put a future 2nd on the table (preferably, SJ's when/if Kane doesn't re-sign there), I wouldn't care too much. I do not want them trading 32 for Grubauer.
The site hasn't added this past season and I am not sure if they will, however I can post comparables to both Raanta and Talbot in Lehners .920 season with Bylsma.

Mobile.png
Mobile (1).png
 

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
56,142
35,257
Rochester, NY
The only time Lehner benefited from a good season was in Bylsma's system. Less high danger saves to be made, most shots came from low scoring areas to the outside and he faced a lot and a lot of low danger shots but it showed in the shootouts his glaring weakness with positioning to tracking the puck in medium to high danger scoring areas. Granted this year defense was non existent because Housley wanted the defense to rush up allowing for more shots to be taken in those areas of weakness for Lehner and that went really against Lehner. However even if I judge him solely in Bylsma's system when he posted that .918 or was it .920? save pct season, Holtby or Grubauer would have looked even better in that system because they are just better goalies overall.

Lehner had a .924 Save% in 21 GP in 15/16 and a .920 Save% in 59 GP in 16/17 under Bylsma.

In 15/16, CJ had a .920 Save% in 45 GP and Ullmark had a .913 Save% in 20 GP.

In 16/17, Nilsson had a .923 Save% in 26 GP. In Vancouver this season, Nilsson had a .901 Save% in 27 GP.

I will be pleasantly surprised if GMJB goes with the likely goalie tandem next season and there is marked improvement in the team's goalie metrics.
 

Icicle

Think big
Oct 16, 2005
6,055
1,007
I'd really just like to see a goalie who has the attributes of: good positioning and skill. Not more retreads of the fat guy who covers the whole crease, but can't even hug a post properly.
 

Sabre the Win

Joke of a Franchise
Jun 27, 2013
12,268
4,956
Lehner had a .924 Save% in 21 GP in 15/16 and a .920 Save% in 59 GP in 16/17 under Bylsma.

In 15/16, CJ had a .920 Save% in 45 GP and Ullmark had a .913 Save% in 20 GP.

In 16/17, Nilsson had a .923 Save% in 26 GP. In Vancouver this season, Nilsson had a .901 Save% in 27 GP.

I will be pleasantly surprised if GMJB goes with the likely goalie tandem next season and there is marked improvement in the team's goalie metrics.
Not with Lehner and without Bylsma's system unless we get all new goalies which means Lehner out, 1A in and Ullmark 1B and our defense actually plays defense unless Housley goes full Bylsma and keeps it a grindy game keeping shots to the outside.

For all the warts and shit Bylsma faced here, he at least played to this teams strengths at the time rather than Housley trying to install a system that doesn't have the players to support it. The goalies I am sure were appreciative of it, I can understand why the players hated it.
 

Zip15

Registered User
Jun 3, 2009
28,121
5,401
Bodymore
The site hasn't added this past season and I am not sure if they will, however I can post comparables to both Raanta and Talbot in Lehners .920 season with Bylsma.

View attachment 119875 View attachment 119877

I should be more clear, as I certainly like Raanta better than Lehner: I think Lehner has been better than Talbot since the trades - which is why I noted acquisition cost.

In any event, I don't expect Lehner back next year. I simply hope that we do not trade 32 for Grubauer.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad