based on what?
Based on the way the team played this year.
If our players could score in the shootout, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
based on what?
There's a difference between getting contributions from young players and the "we're going to lose, we might as well lose with kids" attitude that some people seem to have around here. Gelinas has played 60 games this year, and is getting a little under 17 minutes a night. I would say that's being given plenty of opportunity, especially given his weaknesses defensively. Merrill is playing 19 minutes a night as a rookie. Henrique has played a ton as a young player. Larsson has played 125 games in the NHL as a defenseman, and he's 21. Kids have been given plenty of opportunities under this coach who doesn't know how to coach kids. Some have grabbed the opportunity and run with it. Others haven't.
Based on the way the team played this year.
If our players could score in the shootout, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Based on the way the team played this year.
If our players could score in the shootout, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Based on the way the team played this year.
If our players could score in the shootout, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Bernier is a bust and Gionta is a dime a dozen AHL player.
Yet one is on the PP and the other is on the PK.
He may be a good coach but hes not the right coach for this team and that's been the case ever since 9 went home.
But are they really the prime reasons that this team is unsuccessful? Let's be serious here. It's a bad team with an above average coach, but that particular coach is the entirely wrong fit at this juncture of time.
He gets benched for Stephen Gionta and Tim Sestito.
The only way I want him back is if Lou has a long sit down with him this summer and tells him, Larsson, Josefson, Merrill, and Gelinas absolutely need to be in the lineup every single night, no matter what.
and rightfully so. when called upon, they have earned it. when JJ is called upon, he gets injured. thems the breaks.
To be an above average coach you would have to be in the top 15 of coaches, I doubt Pdb with his track record is even there.
He probably would work well with Boston(who wouldn't?) but teams like Boston aren't hurting in the coaching department. After he gets fired here I could see him going to Toronto.
What on Earth has Tim Sestito done to earn a roster spot?
0 goals in 83 NHL games. Cam has three just this year
watch the games...sestito does something on every shift. usually throwing hits, sometimes crashing the crease. what else do you want for a bottom 6?
he hasn't earned a spot, but if we're injured and need someone in there, I'm picking sestito
0 goals in 83 NHL games. Cam has three just this year
Seriously, I'm not even trying to hate on Sestito, but what is a 29 yr old guy who has never scored in the NHL bringing to this team?
I feel the same way about JJ! love the guy, but to make a point on this board you have to **** on a player...fault of the system.
TS plays a very PDB game...so he's in. It's pretty clear he likes to roll 4 lines, and the bottom 6 need to provide something intangible (energy?) and JJ doesn't seem to be that kind of player. still early though
I don't think 4th line players be solely intangible guys. I think we expect intangible only because they tend to be the cheapest contracts and thus least talented.
I also think given how grindy this team is otherwise, having very grindy fwds on the 4th is massive overkill in the grind dept.
Not to mention how many 30 yr old journeymen type guys we have.
Not to mention we are not a playoff team.
All this adds up to a guy like JJ should be playing. And he should be playing with guys who have some level of ability. And no doubt JJ needs to find ways to put points on the stat sheet, but would be nice if coach didn't put hurdles up in the way.