Pastor Of Muppetz
Registered User
- Oct 1, 2017
- 26,145
- 16,000
One of the two has a durability issue...Schmidt's current deal ends when he is 34, one year younger than Tanev.
Tanev's is a retirement contract, but Schmidt's isn't?
One of the two has a durability issue...Schmidt's current deal ends when he is 34, one year younger than Tanev.
Tanev's is a retirement contract, but Schmidt's isn't?
Nobodys arguing that contacts like these mitigated Bennings flexibility with the cap.
We don't live in an alternate reality where Sutter, Eriksson, and Roussel isn't signed though. All this just distills down to Benning bad, which goes without saying. What are you saying that isn't already known by now? What imaginary Benning bro are you arguing against?We don't have money for Markstrom or Tanev or Toffoli, but we sure as hell have cash to burn on Sutter Eriksson and Roussell.
Markstrom noThen our cap situation played an integral role in the team's loss of Markstrom, Tanev, Stecher, and indisputably, Toffoli.
This is all Benning's mess. All of it.
Markstrom no
Tanev ..possibly
Stecher ..possibly (but I think they wanted to move on from him anyway)
Toffoli..most definitely.
One of the two has a durability issue...
Moving away from Tanev and relying on a broken Hamonic and rookies to take on key minutes is like moving away from Hamhuis to extend Sbisa.
Management has always discussed leadership and needing it when they've chased away key leaders from the dressing room.
Among goalies with a mimimum 300 minutes:
View attachment 393691
Both also have more goals allowed than expected. Still somewhat early, shown by the best goalie in the league last season being 5th worst.
He seems like a good guy but the Holtby signing is quietly awful.
Put it this way :
The 6th year on Markstrom's contract at $6 million couldn't look any worse than the first year of Holtby's contract at $5 million looks now.
Also, if that negotiation was handled differently, I highly doubt it would have taken 6 years to sign him.
If you sign a Vezina-calibre goalie and he delivers you 3-4 elite seasons, you're OK with eating that last year. It's crazy that people have drawn a line here after the amount of lunatic contracts and wasted money on garbage players who never even had a chance of moving the needle.
Your first point makes me laugh; Holtby has played 7 games for us. I hope I live long enough to bring this one back up in 6 years time.
Your second one is the typical "Benning can't make a good deal" type opinion. Calgary DID offer the 6th year. You think he's not going to take it? What are you suggesting, that Marky would have accepted, say a 5 year $7 million deal just to stay here and give us that good old fashioned "hometown discount" that everybody seems to think guys will give us, one of the least favorite destinations in the whole NHL? I'm betting that we would have at least had to match what Calgary gave him to keep him. He's already shown signs of getting injured a bit. What will he be like in that regard in 6 years? Hell, 2 years?
Finally you say Marky gave us "3-4 elite seasons". He did? We missed the playoffs in all but one and when we finally made them he promptly got hurt and was bailed out by his understudy. Now Holtby, there's a guy who delivered "3-4 elite seasons" (sadly for another team) and he actually WON a Vezina, Jennings, Stanley Cup. But that was awhile ago and so means nothing, right? His experience is totally useless in mentoring our green new protege, amirite? Despite not making the playoffs Marky was terrific DESPITE his team but now that he's gone it is suddenly incumbent on the goalies to save the day every night no matter how impossible the task. If you were to judge Marky's time here using the same criteria that folks here are using to judge Holtby/Demko's performances so far he sucks just as hard with scattered bright spots here and there last season. No goalie alive could solve this team's woes right now.
Yes he did...as did Tanev, and StecherMarkstrom said repeatedly that he wants to stay in Vancouver, didn't he?
Not to appeal to authority here ,but Benning most certainly would have talked this over with with goaltending coach Clark..would he not?Goalies aren't the problem but Demko wasn't guaranteed to continue development this year and/or take over the #1 job. Holtby IMO was a decent gamble but should have leveraged the flat cap and given him $3M.
Holtby was one of the worst goalies in the NHL last year, and mediocre the season before that. This is not some sort of blip.
I was just browsing the Flames' forum to get a sense of how Tanev and Markstrom is performing. Someone there mentioned that they have been two of their three best players this season. Legit made me sick to my stomach reading that.
Any advanced metrics to show that they have been playing at a very high level to start the season?
Tofu did too.Yes he did...as did Tanev, and Stecher
And his drop off is even more concerning when you see the D he had in front of him in Washington..
You think once our top players hit FA all things (money) being equal they will re sign here? Lol.
no chance. Anaheim, LA it’s nice and warm and nobody knows you, maybe NYR or Islanders to live in the big Apple. No reason for them to want to stay on a perennial sinking ship.