PricePkPatch*
Guest
A large % of players in the KHL mutually terminated their contracts due to the ruble crash.
Ah. And its the case with Raddy?
A large % of players in the KHL mutually terminated their contracts due to the ruble crash.
First of all, he put Vanek on a checking line and he struggled. The guy came out in the papers and actually talked about how he'd have to prove himself worthy of first line minutes and work his way up to offensive ice. You're talking like it was smooth sailing... it wasn't.Sekac isn't half the player that Radulov is......
Its a little different when you are talking third line talent vs a game breaking first liner.
To me I don't see the comparison between a guy who is a rookie, and is still having trouble cracking the lineup in Anaheim, and Radulov who is going to come in as a guy who already has a 60 point NHL season under his belt, is the second leading scorer in KHL history, and just won the KHL scoring title with 71 points vs Sekac who had 28 points in his last KHL season.
You're going to have to come up with a better example than "Sekac and Therrien didn't get a long".... because I'm not buying that comparison.
The closest is the Vanek comparison... and Vanek did very well here in the regular season before becoming a disaster in the playoffs, but I'm not even sure that is Therrien seeing how Vanek didn't do any better with Minnesota.
Therrien gave Vanek every opportunity to succeed. Its not his fault Vanek didn't seize that opportunity.
We criticize Therrien's lack of offence all the time... but look at what the article points out... all of those final 4 teams have 3-4 players who would play on our first line. We have one player with the talent to join the first line of one of those teams (Max Pacioretty). People want Therrien to play this run and gun style and criticize him when we don't.. but the reality is we have an excellent goalie, a pretty darn good defence... and a Pop-gun offense with one game breaker. Its no wonder he wants a defensive system and not to play run and gun.
Give him some better pieces (like a Radulov) before saying he doesn't know how to use them, and sorry, Sekac wasn't one of those elite offensive pieces.
Ah. And its the case with Raddy?
Yeah... no.Vanek was put on the first line with Max and given huge offensive zone starts from the day he was traded to the Habs until game 2 of the series against Boston.
I don't dispute that they weren't great signings. But again, its a horrible fit with this coach.Even when he was moved down at ES, he continued to get PP time til very late in the series vs the Rangers.
Lets not forget that.
As for others you've mentionned
Briere- was struggling enough in Philly to be bought out.. has struggled in Colorado post trade. I wouldn't call him someone who Therrien wasted the talent... the talent was past its best before date by the time he got to montreal.
Parenteau - struggling in Colorado and run out of town there.
Eller and Sekac were basically banished to Siberia yes. Galchenyuk just got screwed over by DD after playing well in the role...Eller and Galchenyuk were sent to Siberia? Oh you mean a coach benched a young player once? Something every coach in the NHL does. I don't know if you noticed but guys like Jonathan Drouin have been a healthy scratch in Tampa.. .it happens... and Galchenyuk may not be on your schedule, but I don't think he's done badly for a 21 year old who missed an entire season of development in Junior.
Did you watch the clip I just showed you? Seriously man, watch the clip. "Don't be fancy... don't try to slow down the game... chip and chase etc..." That goes against Radulov's whole way of playing.None of these guys are at the level Radulov is at right now. None of them.
Unless Therrien changes his system altogether I don't see him adapting for any player. This is a coach who had the cup winning champs 30th in shots when he was fired. What kind of skilled player would come here when there are other options?Coaches adapt to thw players they have. The way he coaches a 28 pt khl guy and the way he coaches a guy who won the scoring title with 71 points wont be the same.
Coaches adapt to thw players they have. The way he coaches a 28 pt khl guy and the way he coaches a guy who won the scoring title with 71 points wont be the same.
Unless Therrien changes his system altogether I don't see him adapting for any player. This is a coach who had the cup winning champs 30th in shots when he was fired. What kind of skilled player would come here when there are other options?
It's not that I think we couldn't use Radulov's skills it's just that I don't think he'd do well under MT and I don't see him coming here to begin with.
Like others I Don't believe that Radulov would be interested in coming to Montreal with the system we currently employ. It's too bad, he'd be an immediate first line RW solution.
A large % of players in the KHL mutually terminated their contracts due to the ruble crash.
Yeah, believe whatever other tell you you should believeRadulov is a mess outside the rink. Only Patrick Roy could 'somewhat' control him in the past but it was only on the ice.
Ask Quebec.
also, give a list of ELITE FA's over the years.
I realize that and I'm not saying it could never happen. I just don't think MT helps the situation.Petry stayed, it's not out of the question. MT won't be here forever. All that assuming Rady actually leaves the KHL this year
Radulov is a mess outside the rink. Only Patrick Roy could 'somewhat' control him in the past but it was only on the ice.
Radulov is a mess outside the rink. Only Patrick Roy could 'somewhat' control him in the past but it was only on the ice.
Therrien could teach him rispek and how to be a better person