I'm guessing that you're serious here. If not, please disregard the rest...
I have pointed to a fact in which to base my argument that the team doesn't play a different game upon. I'm not sure what you're basing your opinion on, other than "it is patently obvious" and that I don't understand how the game works.
Don't let this post paint you as a hypocrite...construct and defend an argument, son.
The fact that you're basing your argument on is that there's no difference in offensive output (in terms of goals scored) when Peters is in net than when Ward is in net.
Ward:
Edmonton - 4 goals for
San Jose - 5 goals for (1 ENG)
Vancouver - 2 goals for
New Jersey - 2 goals for
New Jersey - 4 goals for
Ottawa - 4 goals for (1 ENG)
Boston - 2 goals for
Boston - 1 goal for
Islanders - 4 goals for
Toronto - 3 goals for
Chicago - 2 goals
Phoenix - 3 goals
LA - 1 goal
Pittsburgh - 2 goals
Detroit - 2 goals
41 goals for (39 without the ENGs)
3 or more goals in 7 of the 15 games
Peters:
Phoenix - 3 goals for (1 ENG)
Calgary - 1 goal for
Vancouver - 0 goals for
Nashville - 5 goals for (1 ENG)
Washington - 4 goals for
Detroit - 3 goals for
St Louis - 2 goals for
Anaheim - 2 goals for
Colorado - 2 goals for
Minnesota - 2 goals for
Islanders - 1 goal
Philly - 2 goals
Rangers - 1 goal
Tampa Bay - 0 goals
Pittsburgh - 1 goal
Colorado - 2 goals
Wild - 1 goal
32 goals for (30 without the ENGs)
3 or more goals in 4 of the 17 games
Peters goal support - 1.7 per game
Ward goal support - 2.6 per game
That's a pretty significant difference, IMO. And it supports what my eyes have told me: The team plays a much more defensive brand of hockey in front of Peters at the cost of their offensive output, while Ward gets very little defensive help, but the team can generally score in front of him because of it.