The better career: Larionov vs Oates

Discussion in 'The History of Hockey' started by PapaBear*, Feb 13, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
View Users: View Users
  1. PapaBear*

    PapaBear* Guest

    Larionov for me, by a slight edge.
     
  2. trentmccleary

    trentmccleary Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2002
    Messages:
    21,553
    Likes Received:
    238
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    Alfie-Ville
    Home Page:
    Craig Janney for me.
     
  3. octopi

    octopi Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2004
    Messages:
    31,547
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'd say Larionov, he's won a heck of a lot more.
     
  4. Juicer

    Juicer Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2004
    Messages:
    851
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    64
    Hockey career or NHL career?
     
  5. Burnaby_Joe*

    Burnaby_Joe* Guest

    Adam Oates
     
  6. kira

    kira Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    15,688
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    www.datsyuk13.com
    Home Page:
    The Professor, hands down...
     
  7. Hadoop

    Hadoop The GOAT Generation

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2002
    Messages:
    4,990
    Likes Received:
    222
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Toronto
    Larionov fairly easily (since 'career' should include International competition).
     
  8. Wisent

    Wisent Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2003
    Messages:
    3,667
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Mannheim
    Home Page:
    Larionov, no question.
     
  9. wilka91*

    wilka91* Registered User

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    4,251
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think every one know the answer. It's one of those 99% vs 1% polls. Larionov.
     
  10. VanIslander

    VanIslander Don't waste my time

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2004
    Messages:
    27,486
    Likes Received:
    1,871
    Trophy Points:
    187
    San Jose first upset Detroit in the playoffs a decade ago in large part because of the play of Larionov. After that, the Red Wings decided to buy his services. I stopped watching him then because I can't stand Detroit.

    Earlier in his career, in Vancouver, Larionov played great.

    And internationally in the eighties he was one of the Soviet greats.

    So, in terms of Hall of Fame votes, Larionov will out garner Oates.

    But we are talking about two of the great passers in the history of the game, (though junior cousins to Grets).
     
  11. John Flyers Fan

    John Flyers Fan Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    22,416
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    If we're talking just NHL, it's Oates by a HUGE margin. if we're talking entire career, it would be very close, flip of a coin.
     
  12. Reilly311

    Reilly311 Guest


    why? because he has more points? I'd love to hear your reasoning.
     
  13. John Flyers Fan

    John Flyers Fan Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    22,416
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    If we're just speaking about NHL careers:

    Oates is more physical, was a great face-off man, a better goal scorer, and a slightly better passer.
     
  14. Higgy4

    Higgy4 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2004
    Messages:
    7,548
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Toledo, Ohio
    I dont think its Oates by a HUGE margin if judging just NHL careers. Larionov does have 3 Stanley Cup rings, and the fact that he put up decent numbers in his NHL career despite playing all of his prime years in Russia is pretty impressive.

    Its Larionov by a huge margin if you judge both players entire careers. And I think its pretty close if judging only what they did in the NHL.
     
  15. Higgy4

    Higgy4 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2004
    Messages:
    7,548
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Toledo, Ohio
    Slightly better passer? Are you serious? People have talked for years how Larionov was only behind Gretzky in on ice vision and passing ability. Apparently you didnt watch enough of the man to fully appreciate his passing. It was sick. Oates is terrific, dont get me wrong...one of the best. But Larionov is the best passer I have seen other than Gretzky.

    And Oates is more physical? Big deal. Thats like saying Rosie O'Donnell is fatter than Roseanne. Who cares?
     
  16. John Flyers Fan

    John Flyers Fan Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    22,416
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    Kirk Maltby has 3 stanley Cups, that doesn't make him better than Oates with none. Larionov was a good player for the Red Wings, but he was never one of their 4 or 5 most important players on the Cup winning teams.

    Larionov did exactly what you said, he put up decent numbers in the NHL, while Oates has put up great numbers.

    Also Larionov did come over at 29, so I wouldn't say all his prime years were spent in Russia.

    Oates by a huge margin, and rightly so as he played his entire career in the NHL, and flip a coin overall.
     
  17. Reilly311

    Reilly311 Guest


    A better goal scorer? :lol

    Neither players are goal scorers, but Oates benefited on the stats sheet from not playing 7 or 8 years in russia at the begining of his career.

    Neither players are physical at all and I'd bet they're just about the same on faceoffs.
     
  18. John Flyers Fan

    John Flyers Fan Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    22,416
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    Larionov is an excellent passer, no doubt, but I'll take Oates, as one of the games 3 best passers of the last 25 years.

    I'm not just talking about throwing bodychecks, but willing to play in traffic, and take hits to make a play.
     
  19. HughJass*

    HughJass* Guest

    So explain to me why the way Oates still put up the numbers until a couple of years ago and Larionov didn't produce at his level?

    This is really a tricky debate, but I've always maintained Larionov gets more credit that he deserves, and Adam Oates has never been garnered the respect he deserves. This is actually a great "v." debate.
     
  20. John Flyers Fan

    John Flyers Fan Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    22,416
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    Neither are known for goal scoring, but Oates was better at it.

    My whole point was just speaking about NHL career, than Oates is clearly better, what about that is so hard to understand ??? :shakehead


    Oates is more physical and more willing to play in traffic that Larionov has. You guess on face-offs would be wrong. Oates has been a great face-off man, always among the league leaders in face-off %.
     
  21. mvp76

    mvp76 Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2004
    Messages:
    1,825
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Listening to you...
    Location:
    planet earth
    Igor
     
  22. hockeytown9321

    hockeytown9321 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,358
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Please explain how the Red Wings "bought" his services.
     
  23. Vagabond

    Vagabond Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2004
    Messages:
    6,210
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    96
    Occupation:
    Subcontractor
    Location:
    Edmonton


    :lol: I still pick Oates.
     
  24. KOVALEV10*

    KOVALEV10* Guest

    Ok here are the points and Points per game averages of both men and to be fair I chose the seasons of Oates starting when he was 29 which is when Larionov got to the nhl.

    P GP PPG

    Larionov:
    44 in 74- 0.59
    34 in 64- 0.53
    65 in 72- 0.90
    56 in 60- 0.93
    24 in 33- 0.72
    73 in 73- 1
    54 in 64- 0.84
    47 in 69- 0.68
    63 in 75- 0.84
    47 in 79- 0.59
    40 in 65- 0.61
    43 in 70- 0.61
    43 in 74- 0.58
    11 in 49- 0.22

    Oates:
    30 in 26- 1.15
    142 in 84- 1.69
    112 in 77- 1.45
    53 in 48- 1.10
    92 in 70- 1.31
    82 in 80- 1.02
    12 in 17: 0.70
    76 in 82- 0.92
    54 in 59- 0.91
    71 in 82- 0.86
    82 in 81- 1.01
    78 in 80- 0.97
    45 in 67- 0.67
    18 in 60- 0.30

    Oates is definately better. Larionov has had only 1 season where he has put up a point per game while Oates has had 7. Oates' highest assist mark is 98 while Larionov's is 50! And people think Larionov is the best passer since Gretzky :shakehead

    Of the past 25 years heres who I would rank better then Larionov.

    1- Gretzky
    2- Lemieux
    3- Trottier
    4- Oates
    5- Coffee

    Larionov sure is in the top 10 but definately not the best since Gretzky. Oates is a better passer, better point producer, tougher player as mentioned in this thread and has had the better career. So I would definately go with Oates.
     
  25. Reilly311

    Reilly311 Guest



    and you came to this conclusion how?




    Based on numbers, yes, Oates had a better career. I bet he would trade some of his points for a stanley cup though. Had Igor played in the NHL his entire career, he'd probably have over 1000 points and this wouldn't even be a debate who's better.





    What does "more willing to play in traffic" mean exactly? Why does this even matter?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"