NOTENOUGHJTCGOALS
Registered User
- Feb 28, 2006
- 13,542
- 5,771
I thought Corsi was supposed to be correlated strongly with winning games? It's meant to approximate possession?
The more you know!
^So If I'm reading that right. We're doing a(Very surprisingly) very good job in our own end at 5v5, but doing a(Not surprisingly) very poor job at scoring and doing anything offensively?
The offensive side sounds about right as we've all seen the struggles. But Defensively is a surprise. Definitely feel we've improved this year but dont think we're improved that much.
Much appreciated.
A good shrewd hiring of a former NHL forward who can pass on some offensive skill and teach these guys how to convert their chances and improve the PP will really help us get over one of the bumps. I don't think Bednar will be able to improve the team offensively outside of roster improvements but he can improve the defence, an assistant needs to be brought in to help run offense.
After 17 games:
5v5 Corsi: 50.15 (15th)
5v5 Corsi Close: 48.56 (22nd)
5v5 Corsi score and venue adjusted: 48.69 (20th)
PDO: 976 (25th)
Off Zone Starts: 261
Def Zone Starts: 250
ZS %: 51.08 (14th)
5v5 GF %: 41.51 (28th)
Point Percentage: 0.94 (24th)
Scoring Chance %: 48.48 (19th)
Replacing Iggy might make the Corsi worse... he actually has the 2nd highest Corsi on the team of players who have played a decent amount of minutes. Gelinas is #2 on D. Careful with the numbers.
Replacing Iggy might make the Corsi worse... he actually has the 2nd highest Corsi on the team of players who have played a decent amount of minutes. Gelinas is #2 on D. Careful with the numbers.
And Marty is awful. Iggy was carried by MacK for a while and hasn't had much of a ride on the submarine that is Soderberg, so that part is more explained.
Maybe Bednar wasn't giving Iggy those minutes because he believed in him or because he was too scared to demote him. Maybe Bednar is more genius than we thought and is trying to inflate Iggys underlying numbers as much as his production to boost that trade value lol.
CF% took a bit of a hit after last game, but I was a bit surprised to see our total shot differential was only -8 and that was after getting outshot by 15. At the end of last season it was -302. Slightly better pace this year.
Overall, all the numbers are far better this year aside from shooting percentage. Hope we can keep it up all year.
Not all the numbers are better. The scoring chances for are down, shooting percentage is down, the save percentage is down (expected IMO), GF/60 are way down (along with GA/60 not being down much), and GF% is way down. This team still has to find its way offensively. Defensively they are limiting shots and chances way better than years previous.
Yeah, I guess I mean all the "controllable" stats are better, mostly our shot and Corsi differential. Our PDO shouldn't be 25th, and I don't think it'll stay there. I am exponentially more confident in our forwards figuring out how to find the back of the net than I ever have been in the past of our defense figuring out how to suppress shots.
Not all the numbers are better. The scoring chances for are down, shooting percentage is down, the save percentage is down (expected IMO), GF/60 are way down (along with GA/60 not being down much), and GF% is way down. This team still has to find its way offensively. Defensively they are limiting shots and chances way better than years previous.
how is save percentage going down expected as they are limiting chances better than years previous?
how is save percentage going down expected as they are limiting chances better than years previous?
Are people good with me updating the numbers every 5 games?