Hodgy
Registered User
- Feb 23, 2012
- 4,337
- 4,340
And that was my reply to it. New York could also just keep him as a rental if the return isn't good.
That almost never happens.
And that was my reply to it. New York could also just keep him as a rental if the return isn't good.
I would be so sad if we traded Hansen. He's the one player the Canucks need: A kid that is fast who is a great forechecker (I guess Kenins plays that type of way too).
There is no way we get Zuccarello without giving up our 1st. Yes, he's a UFA, but there will be a number of teams lining up for him. His value is comparable to Sekera as a late first won't be much for Chicago or Montreal to give up. Higgins+ is not going to remotely interest New York. Even if they did want a roster player included, it'd be Hansen I imagine. The Rags had Higgins, they dealt him because he couldn't score. Why would they want him now when... he can't score?
And that was my reply to it. New York could also just keep him as a rental if the return isn't good.
I highly doubt the Canucks are going to trade Higgins, who is signed for next season, at the deadline when they have three of their regular bottom 6 forwards headed to UFA. Doesn't make a lick of sense unless at least two of those guys is re-signed before Monday.
Vrbata for Zuccarello?
Seems kinda harsh to dump Radim now but I'd do it to get Zucc signed at the same money to a longer term. Probably doesn't work for their cap anyway.
Vrbata for Zuccarello?
Seems kinda harsh to dump Radim now but I'd do it to get Zucc signed at the same money to a longer term. Probably doesn't work for their cap anyway.
Vrbata for Zuccarello?
Seems kinda harsh to dump Radim now but I'd do it to get Zucc signed at the same money to a longer term. Probably doesn't work for their cap anyway.
?
Trade a more productive player, who is signed for next season, for a less productive player set to become an UFA, and likely looking to cash in. Where's the logic in that?
Sedins for stamkos?
No point making these nonsense trades/comments.....
Vrbata for Zuccarello?
Seems kinda harsh to dump Radim now but I'd do it to get Zucc signed at the same money to a longer term. Probably doesn't work for their cap anyway.
I highly doubt the Canucks are going to trade Higgins, who is signed for next season, at the deadline when they have three of their regular bottom 6 forwards headed to UFA. Doesn't make a lick of sense unless at least two of those guys is re-signed before Monday. If anything Higgins is a candidate to be traded at the draft.
Why would we do that?
This was suggested on the trade board, and even a Rangers fan said it was an overpayment.
That didn't happen. I did steal it from the main board (Ranger fan suggested it was the only player they'd want) and one Ranger fan thought Vrbata was a better player.
http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=1844397&page=6
This was suggested on the trade board, and even a Rangers fan said it was an overpayment.
I did say "Rangers fan", didn't I?
It wasn't suggested nor did a Ranger fan say it was overpayment.
Other than that you were correct.
What is with the big love-in for Mats Zuccarello?
I'm not going to turn this into an argument because this would be ridiculous to argue about, but a Rangers mod basically did suggest it and it was aTB poster that said it was an overpayment, so my apologies there.
What's ridiculous is trying to dismiss my proposal based on things that didn't happen.
He caught my eye first watching him play for Norway at the Olympics. My wife is from Norway and had family come visit with tickets in hand. He's smart and skilled but it's really his battle level that sticks out for a small guy. He's got that little extra that those guys need.
I've been following his career ever since and he has shown the same thing in the NHL. His willingness to engage let him start his NHL career in the bottom 6 and blossom into a really good top 6 player and point producer.