East Coast Bias
Registered User
I'm not all that familiar with Hockey WAR but I see EK is 87th overall (while 3rd in Dmen) in WAR over a period of time.
Does WAR just not value Dmen that much?
Does WAR just not value Dmen that much?
I think this question needs more context. In terms of what?
OK with the current New York Rangers handing out these deals?
OK with market value that was received?
OK how?
My understanding is that there is no universally accepted WAR formula in hockey. Hockey analytics lags behind baseball in terms of a magic stat like that.I'm not all that familiar with Hockey WAR but I see EK is 87th overall (while 3rd in Dmen) in WAR over a period of time.
Does WAR just not value Dmen that much?
Probably Schaller or Rieder. Not many of them.Legitimate question, dude. Would you have been OK handing out ANY of the multi-year deals handed out on July 1st?
Probably Schaller or Rieder. Not many of them.
Really glad we balked on Komarov and Beagle.Rieder was a one-year deal.
To me, Schaller was overpaid by about $750K, but at $1.9 I guess it's not THAT terrible.
But yeah. I thought the deals handed out this 7/1 were insane. I can't recall scrubs getting paid like this in this quantity before. And the damn TERMS!!!!
My new hypothesis is that teams just think that the depth they currently own is better than the depth that is available out there. So teams aren't lining up for Franson to be their 6/7 D because they already have guys in that spot, or they can plug in youth.Idk why Nick Shore is still a free agent, but Gorton pls. Even Letestu would be a good depth signing
Nothing wrong with internal competition when it comes to fourth line/bottom pairing roles. In fact, I'd encourage it.My new hypothesis is that teams just think that the depth they currently own is better than the depth that is available out there. So teams aren't lining up for Franson to be their 6/7 D because they already have guys in that spot, or they can plug in youth.
Like, I bet if you asked Gorts, he'd tell you he'd prob just have Nieves win that 4C spot than sign Nick Shore for it.
Oh, I agree wholeheartedly, but I could see the hesitation about "wasting" an SPC on a guy you're only bringing in as competition fodder.Nothing wrong with internal competition when it comes to fourth line/bottom pairing roles. In fact, I'd encourage it.
You’re probably correct, but I see him as a Paul Carey replacement. Good, 4th line energy forward that can PK and won’t hurt you at ES. Shift Nieves over to LW since he doesn’t utilize his playmaking skills down the middle or ever shoots the puck.My new hypothesis is that teams just think that the depth they currently own is better than the depth that is available out there. So teams aren't lining up for Franson to be their 6/7 D because they already have guys in that spot, or they can plug in youth.
Like, I bet if you asked Gorts, he'd tell you he'd prob just have Nieves win that 4C spot than sign Nick Shore for it.
Yeah I think Nick Shore would be a really good depth add.You’re probably correct, but I see him as a Paul Carey replacement. Good, 4th line energy forward that can PK and won’t hurt you at ES. Shift Nieves over to LW since he doesn’t utilize his playmaking skills down the middle or ever shoots the puck.
My new hypothesis is that teams just think that the depth they currently own is better than the depth that is available out there. So teams aren't lining up for Franson to be their 6/7 D because they already have guys in that spot, or they can plug in youth.
Like, I bet if you asked Gorts, he'd tell you he'd prob just have Nieves win that 4C spot than sign Nick Shore for it.
Yeah there should be some pretty good below-average competition for the 4C spot at camp this year.They also like Fontaine at that spot.
Yeah there should be some pretty good below-average competition for the 4C spot at camp this year.
Point conversion across leagues.What are those numbers?
It’s not predictive of scoring since there’s a huge middle ground of data that pulls the overall scores down. Special case examples like Chytil need to be viewed as comparables to who fit that age group. It’s not really a development league.so is the AHL not a competitive league or is it just not predictive of NHL scoring
Probably a limitation of where he was scraping the data from, or a time thing. I think in the past, the league was "Russia" but more recently it's "KHL".What's the difference between KHL and Russia?
Yes, that is NHLePoint conversion across leagues.
NHLe = NHL Expectancy... I think.
Yes, that is NHLePoint conversion across leagues.
NHLe = NHL Expectancy... I think.