The 2014-2015 6 in 5 thread.

[Gentle Man]

hahaha CH I cant argue that the ref thing isn't legit anymore, its become blatant.

that said:

Looking at ATF's beautiful chart there is a clear issue and a sublte one.

The clear issue is the 5 game losing streak 9th set. Tragic. never recovered. There is also a 4 game losing streak sandwiched between some wins series 12..

The subtle element is we never won more than 3 in a row. Why? lack of scoring, plain and simple. A ridiculous amount of games we didn't score 3, a magic number needed.

Quicker start would feel than the 0-3 start for sure.

WE all know we need more scoring to stop the losing streaks, and score 3 goals a game to secure reg wins for next yr.

Till then thanks for following this thread, and having a relaxed non yelling site to come to and put things in perspective.

Couldn't do it without ATF !!!

Next year, I think between Pirri, Bjugstad, Barkov, Hubey, Jagr (Damn it he will be back) if we get between 120-140 goals combined, the team will be successful. Over 140 is just absolute butter. Everyone else in the roster will be relied on to push us above and beyond 200

 

[FlaPanthers11]

Thanks for running it AG and ATF. Always a good thread to go to no matter the situation.

 

[adam graves]

Next year, I think between Pirri, Bjugstad, Barkov, Hubey, Jagr (Damn it he will be back) if we get between 120-140 goals combined, the team will be successful. Over 140 is just absolute butter. Everyone else in the roster will be relied on to push us above and beyond 200

That would be awesome!

But Mavs your asking those 5 to average AT LEAST 25 goals per game.

Huby and Barky never have scored 20.

Bjugs and Pirri have, for the lst time.

Jagr at 44 if he scores 15 and makes huby and barky shoot, god bless.

So...god bless if they do, but a gambling guy wouldn't bet on it.

He would bet on a proven multiple time guy.

 

[angry_treefrog]

SET | *********|********* |********* |********* |********* | SET POINTS | RECORD | TOTAL POINTS| VS GOAL | DIVISION| CONFERENCE | PACE

1st 5 |

@TB OTL 3-2​

|

NJD L 5-1​

|

OTT L 1-0​

|

@BUF W 1-0​

|

@WAS SOL 2-1​

|

4​

|

1-2-2​

|

4​

|

-2​

|

7​

|

T-12​

|

65.6​

2nd 5 |

@COL OTW 4-3​

|

@AZ OTL 2-1​

|

AZ W 2-1​

|

PHI W 2-1​

|

@BOS OTL 2-1​

|

8​

|

4-2-4​

|

12​

|

EVEN​

|

7​

|

T-9​

|

98.4​

3rd 5 |

@ PHI L 4-1​

|

CAL L 6-4​

|

SJ W 4-1​

|

NYI SOL 4-3​

|

@ ANA W 6-2​

|

5​

|

6-4-5​

|

17​

|

-1​

|

7​

|

T-11​

|

92.9​

4th 5 |

@ LA L 5-2​

|

@ SJ SOW 3-2​

|

@ NAS SOL 3-2​

|

MIN L 4-1​

|

CAR W 1-0​

|

5​

|

8-6-6​

|

22​

|

-2​

|

7​

|

9​

|

90.2​

5th 5 |

OTT W 3-2​

|

@ CBS L 2-1​

|

@ DET W 4-3​

|

CBS SOL 4-3​

|

BUF W 3-2​

|

7​

|

11-7-7​

|

29​

|

-1​

|

6​

|

8​

|

95.1​

6th 5 |

@ STL L 4-2​

|

@ DET SOW 3-2​

|

@ BUF OTL 4-3​

|

WAS SOW 2-1​

|

@ PHI SOW 2-1​

|

7​

|

14-8-8​

|

36​

|

EVEN​

|

5​

|

7*​

|

98.4​

7th 5 |

@ PIT L 3-1​

|

PIT SOW 4-3​

|

TOR W 6-4​

|

MON SOL 2-1​

|

NYR L 5-2​

|

5​

|

16-10-9​

|

41​

|

-1​

|

6​

|

10​

|

96.1​

8th 5 |

@ BUF W 2-0​

|

@ WAS L 4-3​

|

@ VAN W 3-1​

|

@ CAL W 6-5​

|

@ EDM W 4-2​

|

8​

|

20-11-9​

|

49​

|

+1​

|

5​

|

9​

|

100.5​

9th 5 |

@ WIN L 8-2​

|

COL L 4-2​

|

EDM SOL 3-2​

|

VAN L 2-1​

|

DET L 5-4​

|

1​

| 20-15-10|

50​

|

-4​

|

5​

|

9​

|

91.1​

10th 5 |

CBS W 3-2​

|

@NJ L 3-1​

|

@NYR L 6-3​

|

@NYI W 4-2​

|

LA W 3-2​

|

6​

| 23-17-10|

56​

|

-4​

|

5​

|

9​

|

91.8​

11th 5 |

NAS 3-2 SOL​

|

ANA W 6-2​

|

@MIN L 2-1​

|

@DAL L 2-0​

|

STL SOL 2-1​

|

4​

| 24-19-12 |

60​

|

-6​

|

5​

|

9​

|

89.5​

12th 5 |

@TOR W 3-2​

|

@MON SOW 3-2​

|

@OTT L 4-1​

|

@PIT L 5-1​

|

@CHI SOL 3-2​

|

5​

|26-21-13 |

65​

|

-7​

|

5​

|

9​

|

88.8​

13th 5 |

CHI L 3-0​

|

BUF W 5-3​

|

TB W 4-3​

|

TOR L 3-2​

|

DAL SOL 4-3​

|

5​

| 28-22-14 |

70​

|

-8​

|

5​

|

9​

|

88.3​

14th 5 |

NYI SOW 4-3​

|

WIN W 4-2​

|

@CAR W 2-0​

|

@NYR L 2-1​

|

MON L 3-2​

|

6​

| 31-24-14 |

76​

|

-7​

|

6​

|

9​

|

89​

15th 5 |

DET W 3-1​

|

BOS SOW 2-1​

|

@TB L 4-3​

|

@TOR W 4-1​

|

@MON OTL 3-2​

|

7​

| 34-26-15 |

83​

|

-5​

|

6​

|

10​

|

90.7​

16th 5 |

OTT W 4-2​

|

@BOS L 3-2​

|

CAR W 6-1​

|

TB L 4-0​

|

MON L 4-1​

|

4​

| 36-29-15 |

87​

|

-7​

|

6​

|

10​

|

89.2​

Last 2 |

BOS​

|

NJ​

|

xxx​

|

xxx​

|

xxx​

|

0​

| |

0​

|

EVEN​

|

0​

|

0​

|

0​

x​

http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL/Eastern/Atlantic/Florida.html​

 

[adam graves]

Thanks for running it AG and ATF. Always a good thread to go to no matter the situation.

truly my pleasure.

More, thanks for visiting and inputting.

Next year we will get to 6 more than half the time. I promise.

 

[Aksu]

I cringe everytime I look at the 9th set..

 

[angry_treefrog]

I cringe everytime I look at the 9th set..

It was the Winnipeg game.

They were flying high, got smacked in the face at the end of a long road trip and didn't bounce back psychologically.

 

[adam graves]

I cringe everytime I look at the 9th set..

I do too.

It was the Winnipeg game.

They were flying high, got smacked in the face at the end of a long road trip and didn't bounce back psychologically.

That's on coach.

And a very young team.

 

[Prominence Problem]

It was the Winnipeg game.

They were flying high, got smacked in the face at the end of a long road trip and didn't bounce back psychologically.

That is my turning point in the season. I strongly have stated, before game and after, that GG should of started Montoya.

We'll never know if it would of changed the result, and hindsight is 20-20.

We had a nice streak going, and I feel like the team would of been more pumped up and desperate to win for Al if he started. He had spent the previous 5? seasons with the Jets. Only time we played in Winnipeg, and it was his first game back in the city.

Luo was coming off an emotional game back in Van, and got the win in Edmonton, despite a rocky 3rd period.


One can only wonder...

 

[DarkModePanthers]

It was the Winnipeg game.

They were flying high, got smacked in the face at the end of a long road trip and didn't bounce back psychologically.

That's the day I created my HF account and was excited to post in this thread after beating Edmonton the game before... It's my fault, I should have remained a lurker

Thanks to those who ran this thread. It's the best thread on here!

 

[angry_treefrog]

That's on coach.

And a very young team.

I agree.

If Jagr were in a Panthers sweater going into that game I truly believe this team would be in the playoffs right now.

 

[adam graves]

I agree.

If Jagr were in a Panthers sweater going into that game I truly believe this team would be in the playoffs right now.

So true.

Coach was soft. That's the streak when coach said he wouldn't be "devastated" if we missed the playoffs.

Wtf is that?

He also said "we are tired"

Jägr would have handled all that nonsense.

 

[Prominence Problem]

So true.

Coach was soft. That's the streak when coach said he wouldn't be "devastated" if we missed the playoffs.

Wtf is that?

He also said "we are tired"

Jägr would have handled all that nonsense.

Guaranteed Montoya wasn't tired. It would of been exciting for the team to try and win a game in his return to his former team; a pick-me-up. Pick up their teammate as they would know that'd be the game of the year for Al.

 

[PanthersHockey1]

97-98 points for an 8 spot this year. Pretty incredible. Less parity, more bad teams.

We need 100 next year. How will we get there?

 

[Erased]

97-98 points for an 8 spot this year. Pretty incredible. Less parity, more bad teams.

We need 100 next year. How will we get there?

That's largely due to the McTanking. I think it will go back to around 93-94 points next year.

 

[angry_treefrog]

97-98 points for an 8 spot this year. Pretty incredible. Less parity, more bad teams.

We need 100 next year. How will we get there?

You are seeing the "McDavid/Eichel factor" at play.

Won't be like this next year.

 

[Gentle Man]

Errr as I said in another topic, only one team tanked from the start, Buffalo. Arizona, the 2nd worse team, went into this season wanting to win. Edmonton, the other bad team, is just bad. Toronto didn't tank, they just started to suck.

Now, that does factor in to the inflated totals cause that is anywhere from 6 to 10 points added to your total (Buffalo) and whatnot. But coupled with some injuries (Carolina and Columbus) and Toronto just going off the rails bad, yea, that inflated the points a bit.

 

[angry_treefrog]

The final

SET | *********|********* |********* |********* |********* | SET POINTS | RECORD | TOTAL POINTS| VS GOAL | DIVISION| CONFERENCE | PACE

1st 5 |

@TB OTL 3-2​

|

NJD L 5-1​

|

OTT L 1-0​

|

@BUF W 1-0​

|

@WAS SOL 2-1​

|

4​

|

1-2-2​

|

4​

|

-2​

|

7​

|

T-12​

|

65.6​

2nd 5 |

@COL OTW 4-3​

|

@AZ OTL 2-1​

|

AZ W 2-1​

|

PHI W 2-1​

|

@BOS OTL 2-1​

|

8​

|

4-2-4​

|

12​

|

EVEN​

|

7​

|

T-9​

|

98.4​

3rd 5 |

@ PHI L 4-1​

|

CAL L 6-4​

|

SJ W 4-1​

|

NYI SOL 4-3​

|

@ ANA W 6-2​

|

5​

|

6-4-5​

|

17​

|

-1​

|

7​

|

T-11​

|

92.9​

4th 5 |

@ LA L 5-2​

|

@ SJ SOW 3-2​

|

@ NAS SOL 3-2​

|

MIN L 4-1​

|

CAR W 1-0​

|

5​

|

8-6-6​

|

22​

|

-2​

|

7​

|

9​

|

90.2​

5th 5 |

OTT W 3-2​

|

@ CBS L 2-1​

|

@ DET W 4-3​

|

CBS SOL 4-3​

|

BUF W 3-2​

|

7​

|

11-7-7​

|

29​

|

-1​

|

6​

|

8​

|

95.1​

6th 5 |

@ STL L 4-2​

|

@ DET SOW 3-2​

|

@ BUF OTL 4-3​

|

WAS SOW 2-1​

|

@ PHI SOW 2-1​

|

7​

|

14-8-8​

|

36​

|

EVEN​

|

5​

|

7*​

|

98.4​

7th 5 |

@ PIT L 3-1​

|

PIT SOW 4-3​

|

TOR W 6-4​

|

MON SOL 2-1​

|

NYR L 5-2​

|

5​

|

16-10-9​

|

41​

|

-1​

|

6​

|

10​

|

96.1​

8th 5 |

@ BUF W 2-0​

|

@ WAS L 4-3​

|

@ VAN W 3-1​

|

@ CAL W 6-5​

|

@ EDM W 4-2​

|

8​

|

20-11-9​

|

49​

|

+1​

|

5​

|

9​

|

100.5​

9th 5 |

@ WIN L 8-2​

|

COL L 4-2​

|

EDM SOL 3-2​

|

VAN L 2-1​

|

DET L 5-4​

|

1​

| 20-15-10|

50​

|

-4​

|

5​

|

9​

|

91.1​

10th 5 |

CBS W 3-2​

|

@NJ L 3-1​

|

@NYR L 6-3​

|

@NYI W 4-2​

|

LA W 3-2​

|

6​

| 23-17-10|

56​

|

-4​

|

5​

|

9​

|

91.8​

11th 5 |

NAS 3-2 SOL​

|

ANA W 6-2​

|

@MIN L 2-1​

|

@DAL L 2-0​

|

STL SOL 2-1​

|

4​

| 24-19-12 |

60​

|

-6​

|

5​

|

9​

|

89.5​

12th 5 |

@TOR W 3-2​

|

@MON SOW 3-2​

|

@OTT L 4-1​

|

@PIT L 5-1​

|

@CHI SOL 3-2​

|

5​

|26-21-13 |

65​

|

-7​

|

5​

|

9​

|

88.8​

13th 5 |

CHI L 3-0​

|

BUF W 5-3​

|

TB W 4-3​

|

TOR L 3-2​

|

DAL SOL 4-3​

|

5​

| 28-22-14 |

70​

|

-8​

|

5​

|

9​

|

88.3​

14th 5 |

NYI SOW 4-3​

|

WIN W 4-2​

|

@CAR W 2-0​

|

@NYR L 2-1​

|

MON L 3-2​

|

6​

| 31-24-14 |

76​

|

-7​

|

6​

|

9​

|

89​

15th 5 |

DET W 3-1​

|

BOS SOW 2-1​

|

@TB L 4-3​

|

@TOR W 4-1​

|

@MON OTL 3-2​

|

7​

| 34-26-15 |

83​

|

-5​

|

6​

|

10​

|

90.7​

16th 5 |

OTT W 4-2​

|

@BOS L 3-2​

|

CAR W 6-1​

|

TB L 4-0​

|

MON L 4-1​

|

4​

| 36-29-15 |

87​

|

-7​

|

6​

|

10​

|

89.2​

Last 2 |

BOS W 4-2​

|

NJ W 3-2​

|

xxx​

|

xxx​

|

xxx​

|

4​

| 38-29-15 |

91​

|

-5​

|

6​

|

10​

|

91​

 

[Gizmo Tkachuk]

Set 9..........freaking set 9.....

 

[adam graves]

It's glaring how set 9 did us in.

You can't lose 5 in s row on a team without firepower to win 7 or 8


See yall in october

 

[spacemanatee]

we can always be happy that even if we kept the pace we wouldn't have been in the playoffs anyways, right?

we'll get there next season tho!

 

[Dread Clawz]

we can always be happy that even if we kept the pace we wouldn't have been in the playoffs anyways, right?

we'll get there next season tho!

Yep, a more seasoned team, and a full season of Jagr, well be on a better pace next season. And it should revert back to the norm of around 94-95 pts to get in.

 

[PanthersHockey1]

Set 9..........freaking set 9.....

It's glaring how set 9 did us in.

You can't lose 5 in s row on a team without firepower to win 7 or 8


See yall in october

The worst part about it is we were toe-to-toe in 3 of those games with vancouver, colorado & detroit. WE couldve won those games.