Forget Stazz, what about that Jamie Mcginn, eh?
Ya, when he has been weak for two seasons too we will talk.
Ginner has been weak for 4 games.
Forget Stazz, what about that Jamie Mcginn, eh?
Ya, when he has been weak for two seasons too we will talk.
Ginner has been weak for 4 games.
How many goals did he score in his last 9 games with us last season?
Ya, when he has been weak for two seasons too we will talk.
Ginner has been weak for 4 games.
How many goals did he score in his last 9 games with us last season?
First of all. Why does his last nine games mean much more than his first eight? 7 goals in his first 8 games doesn't mean anything since he only had 1 in 9 games after that?
Besides. McGinn is expected to be a 20 goals per season winger and is being paid 1.75M per season to do so.
Stastnys expectation are obviously miles higher and he should be a PPG player with that contract and he has proved he can be that earlier.
Stastnys contract situation is obviosuly creating this discussion, he is a UFA after next season if he doesnt accept to lower his salary ALOT. And that's why we have a trade discussion.
I dont see why Jamie McGinn who is expected to be a 2nd/3rd line winger and get maybe one goal every fourth game gets brought in to the debate as someone which should "rather trade". He still has 8 goals in his 21 games for the Avs which is well enough for being on a 1.75M contract.
If Mcginn is being placed on the second line, REGARDLESS of dollars, he's expected to score. Something he hasn't done once this season, and once, in his last 9 games last year.
Not good enough.
You all know Stazz is my favorite player in the league, and I agree he needs to do much, much more, as does Jones.
The problem with that line, is it's lacks too much consistency, passion and ability. Being average to below average is far too ok with the players, and our team.
You guys understand that if McGinn didn't like the ping of the post so much he'd be tied for second in the NHL for goals, right?
But he's not. He's last.
I heard of this player named Ovechkin I think? Any ways, he used to be good, but he's only got 1 goal this season. Maybe we should offer Cody McLeod for him since they both have 1 goal.
Please no. Comparing Ovechkin to Mcginn, is like comparing the literary differences between an episode of Jersey Shore, and the novel, A Tale of Two Cities.
One is outdated and boring?
Why is it that everyone nitpicks Stastny to death, throws him under the bus, blame seemingly everything on him, then suggest we could get a top pairing Defensemen for him in a trade?
If he were as bad as some of you make him out to be nobody in their right mind would send us a #1 or #2 Defensemen for him.
How about this idea:
We sign O'Reilly, trade Stastny for #2 defenseman. I think It would upgrade our team. Mitchell can take #3 center duties. Stastny isn't playing with heart anymore and I think change of scenery would benefit Avalanche and Stastny. Done?
I like this idea. Clearly we need something new on D...Perhaps we can ship off one of our 6 bottom pairing defenseman for something as well...
IMO...SOB..ROB..Zanon..Wilson..Hejda..are all the same type of players...
Decent but not top two and on most teams probably in the bottom pairing. Wilson MIGHT be better than the others and Zanon has an amazing Beard that blocks shots all its own...but we need a top 2. Stastny could be the piece that brings us that.
We could also use a GOOD puck moving Dman...Hunwick isnt it...I dont understand Saccos love affair with him...but hes VERY average and makes a lot of mistakes.
How about this idea:
We sign O'Reilly, trade Stastny for #2 defenseman. I think It would upgrade our team. Mitchell can take #3 center duties. Stastny isn't playing with heart anymore and I think change of scenery would benefit Avalanche and Stastny. Done?
I'd want to keep Zanon, Wilson and Hejda.
Ship Stastny, Hunwick and SOB.