The Jays aren't in dire straits. Things could be better, but, they could be much, much worse. Excited to see what's around the corner and what has already made its way here.
But I will say there are two things that come up in the discussions about this year/when was it right to trade JD and/or others which really bug me.
1. If if and buts were candy and nuts.... A lot of people will defend the direction with "We could have made the 2nd Wild Card if x and y were healthy and if z and t had career years and if p and h developed like they should have etc...." Well that's a lot of ifs to be able to beat out approx 5 teams for one spot. All the ifs needed to go right, and normally they won't. Basically there was a close your eyes and hope, then when it didn't happen, its easy to play hindsight and go "But this guy was hurt, and we didn't get a full season out of that guy." Well ya, there was too much that needed to go perfectly, don't be surprised this happened.
2. This comes from a few comments I've seen, but also reading Stoeten's article. The hindsight game is played "We would have been good if", but then, the previous regime gets mentioned having gutting us and having an old core which was declining so "of course we weren't going to be good."
So which is it? Were we going to be good, but in hindsight, the ifs went bad, or were we doomed from the start? This is where the waffling happens or as another poster mentioned well, them not drawing a line in the sand. If we were doomed from the start, draw a line and start the tear down. If we weren't, do more to support your competitiveness.
Again, things aren't awful and good things have happened, are happening, and will happen. But there has also been some mis-management here due to hoping and praying rather than actual doing.