- Feb 23, 2014
- 26,882
- 83,809
Wow. I’m not trying to be a jerk but just because TT plays on the pk doesn’t make him a higher level defensive player. Being an offensive threat can make you a good pk’er. I’m glad he’s bought into working harder defensively, and Rod is pushing the right buttons but he’s not comparable to Lindholm. Pump the breaks a bit. It’s a market deal.
I’d still cringe if the guy was out on a 3 on 3. He’s still going to pass when he needs to shoot. He’s still not a boards player. He is what he is, a skilled passer who meshes well with the guy we’re building around. He hasn’t magically become a different hockey player.
I'm cool with this.
Well we are most likely not going to make the playoffs this year and have had the lowest payroll in the league, at least until TT's deal kicks in. Do you think we're there yet?Looks like that Tuevo Hartford Jerseys I just ordered might age well.
As much crap as I’ve given him earlier in the season, it’s still a good deal at a good price.
I’m still curious as to where the cutoff lies on the how many deals we got to make and contracts we have to sign to satisfy the spend money crowd. Obviously we are not there yet.
Well we most likely not going to make the playoffs this year and have had the lowest payroll in the league, at least until TT's deal kicks in. Do you think we're there yet?
Im happy about that and believe it or not I’m a fan of TT. Just not as passionately as others. I see him differently.
are u saying that this board is overly reactive to short term trends? where the heck do u get off, mister?Give it a 5 game scoring drought, you'll have 90% of the board shift their "passionate" support in the other direction.
Give it a 5 game scoring drought, you'll have 90% of the board shift their "passionate" support in the other direction.
Pretty personal question for a message board don't you think?are u saying that this board is overly reactive to short term trends? where the heck do u get off, mister?
Pretty personal question for a message board don't you think?
I think even with droughts and streakiness, even a dip in production from 60 points, this would still be a solid deal. He's not an ideal first line winger, but he's pretty solid and has good chemistry with Aho. If we had even more talent on this team, I see no reason he couldn't work as a complimentary player away from Aho, but until recently our 2nd line was what McGinn/Staal/Williams?
Pretty personal question for a message board don't you think?