Spezza, Muzzin, Clifford, and Matthews all played like the game was pissing them off in just the right way.
For better or worse, Tavares is not that kind of guy. I don't think that's by itself a bad thing either. He could easily be the leader of a team that answers adversity by adhering to the process, not letting any negative emotions get in the way of that. If you look at some of the others, their character isn't in itself an issue either. Nylander is aloof, I don't think he'll ever take lead as a solution to situations like these, but at the same time I don't think they affect him as much either. Not sure what to make of Marner to be honest, he's usually a bit in between Matthews and Tavares there, but I found him to respond in an almost petulant way tonight. It's the aggregate of the mixture of personalities in the room, I think.
Anyway, I feel like good teams tend to rally around some of these qualities. Some strong teams rally around the fire and pride, like Boston does as we so well know, others by just being unfazed, like LA used to or Blues did last year. The Leafs are just scattered in that way. We can have three shifts in a row where the players try to answer in three different ways.