Yeah losing Rupp killed the Rangers.
Rissmiller came pretty closeI'd love to see a list of players who sign a 3 year contract as a free agent and then never play a game for the organization that signed them.
Rissmiller came pretty close
The thing I don't get about Glass is, why did we need to give him 3 years and 1.45 mil per year? Were there really other teams out there offering him near that amount?
Something to note:
The Rangers signed Glass with the following salaries:
1.9M year 1
1.45M year 2
1.0M year 3
After this year, his real cap # drops to 1.225M.
My guess? Sather and Gorton know that they can unload him at that salary moving forward if need be and they needed someone to come in who can play responsible defensive hockey, hit, fight and play 40-50 games for just this season.
They were able to trade Dorsett for a draft pick in a draft where they had few and able to replace him for a smaller cap hit for right now.
In this division you need someone who can answer the bell when called upon still. It's not all skill. Glass gives AV that option.
His cap number stays the same throughout, though his contract structure makes him easier to unload after this season if they realize the error of their ways. I explored that in depth in July.Something to note:
The Rangers signed Glass with the following salaries:
1.9M year 1
1.45M year 2
1.0M year 3
After this year, his real cap # drops to 1.225M.
My guess? Sather and Gorton know that they can unload him at that salary moving forward if need be and they needed someone to come in who can play responsible defensive hockey, hit, fight and play 40-50 games for just this season.
They were able to trade Dorsett for a draft pick in a draft where they had few and able to replace him for a smaller cap hit for right now.
In this division you need someone who can answer the bell when called upon still. It's not all skill. Glass gives AV that option.
His cap number stays the same throughout, though his contract structure makes him easier to unload after this season if they realize the error of their ways. I explored that in depth in July.
Gotcha.What I meant by his real cap number was his internal cap number for a team with an internal cap
I'm not convinced he is.I don't like the fact that he's a fave of AV. Get bad vibes from that.
I'm not convinced he is.
Every player who played on and left Vancouver during AV's time there is a favorite.Remember how Pyatt was an AV favorite?
Right. Deals like this let Rangers leverage their willingness to spend 'outside' of the Cap.His cap number stays the same throughout, though his contract structure makes him easier to unload.
It's pretty rare for a team to bash a player they just signed.You guys obviously missed all the good things Slats and AV said about him.
No one. And nothing bad would happen.Besides, who's gonna fight if Tanner is not in the lineup...Zucc?
All coaches are liars.AV made some positive comments about this signing. I don't think he's a liar, he obviously knows this player well.
And about the fighting, I'm tired of watching us gettin slapped around because we don't have an answer for the goons.
It's obviously tougher to isolate players influence in hockey than baseball, but a good place to start to look at how other players performed with that individual on the ice as opposed to off of it.Question on Glass (I hate to continue on, but I'm legitimately curious)--when we look at his possession numbers and all of the other advanced statistics that show us how badly he sucks, what kind of detriment to the team does that actually become for a guy getting minimal minutes? As opposed to an "average" guy taking his place. Like with baseball, I understand the components that go into computing WAR, and it's easy for me to understand what a guy with a WAR of 1.5 brings to the table vs. a guy with a -1.0 WAR. Is there something quantifiable like that with advanced hockey stats?