Sideline
Registered User
- May 23, 2004
- 11,111
- 2,831
how funny would it be if Despres-Bortuzzo was the scratched pair?
I didn't compare the two, I said I didn't consider Kulemin an upgrade over Jokinen. Is he a better fit? Perhaps. But I'm pretty sure there are way better fits for this line than Kulemin. People bring up Kulemin all the time because he did well with Geno in very different circumstances (a different league, a different playing style and a larger ice surface). In reality, we don't have a clue if he'd be good with Geno in the NHL. His play in the last three season suggests that he isn't a very good NHLer and certainly not a top 6 forward. Could it work? Maybe! Would I be willing to try it? Sure, if we can have him for a 5th or something like that. Would he be my first target? Certainly not (I'd have to do some research to determine a target, though).
People around here throw his name in trade proposals all the time and it annoys me because, to me, it would be like saying we should go after Brad Boyes because he looked good next to Sid at the WHC once upon a time. Hey, it might work, I might be interested in bringing him in, but he certainly wouldn't be my "ideal" target and he might not be a big enough upgrade that I'd be willing to sacrifice valuable assets to get him. I'd take Kulemin (or Boyes) for a 5th rounder, but no way we'll get him for that.
we must have different definitions of compare.
I don't care if Kulemin and Malkin played together in the Olympics. I don't care if they have slumber parties and paint each other's nails.
I watch Kulemin. I watch Malkin.
As Tender Rip said in another post, we have ample evidence that building the best possible Malkin Line is rather formulaic. Geno + a sniper + a guy who will do the dirty work. Kulemin will do all of that. He is relatively young and should be fairly cheap. And, like I said, even if he's not producing points, he will do all of the little things needed to make sure he's not HURTING the team.
It would certainly be funny to see the meltdown on here.
Something has to give eventually though. Once the D is healthy someone undeserving (Despres) is going to end up not playing.
I love it. "Meltdown."
I think your post is a bit of a meltdown.
Deryk Engelland is not one of the 6 best defensemen on this team right now. If Scuderi sits, Deryk Engelland is not one of the 6 best defensemen out of the remaining 7.
And even if you wanted to play Deryk Engelland over Bobby Dumoulin.
Why is it people can't have an opinion that criticizes the team without people going LOL MELTDOWN. If you disagree, bring something other than derisive quips.
So maybe I think it's a little funny how worked up some people get over these things.
Look, I agree with you. I even said in my post that Despres being benched would be undeserved. I don't think Engelland should be playing over Despres or Bortuzzo. Happy?
Why not give Gibby a shot in the top 6? Or would putting someone who has played a top 6 role his whole life make too much sense?
I can't speak for anyone else, but I enjoy analyzing thing. Like, everything. Sports, movies, books, my kids' weirdness. That's how I enjoy things. I assure you that while I may type "I HATE DAN BYLSMA" (and I do), I'm not actually worked up. I don't lose sleep over it, I'm not sitting at my computer shaking with anger. I'm merely discussing things.
And if you agree with me but you still say something like that, I don't get it. You trollin? You attacking people for no reason? You trying to make yourself sound like a better fan? I dunno. If you agree, just agree?
I think he might get a chance when Malkin is back. Right now, they are in "Grind *****es Down" mode, but when Malkin comes back, there might be more room for someone like Gibbons. Note that they haven't sent him down yet.
I enjoy analyzing things as well, and I enjoy reading these boards obviously to read other peoples' analysis of this team. My sense is just that the tone of this board has gotten way more cynical and nasty since the Boston series where it's just waves of negativity over every single move this team makes, which I see as being over the top. That's my opinion and people are free to disagree.
I'm not trying to troll or attack people or make myself out to be a better fan, and I'm sorry if I offended you. And I know I may have jumped on you specifically in that other thread a few days back, but I swear I'm not trying to just cherry pick your posts or anything. But I really don't see anything I've posted being worse than some of the ridiculous things and borderline personal attacks I read on here every day so if you really have a problem with me, let's take it to PM or take it up with a mod.
Josh Yohe @JoshYohe_Trib
Crosby is still really unhappy with Methot's hit. Said it was "unnecessary."
I figured they would have, like they did with Harry Z even if they were gonna call him back up. Whats your top 6 when Malkin comes back?
Kunitz-Sid-Gibby
Juice-Malkin-Neal?
Oh yeah, it is timePittsburgh Penguins @penguins 1m View translation
#Pens lines: Kunitz-Crosby-Vitale Conner-Jokinen-Neal Zolnierczyk-Sutter-Kobasew Glass-Sill-Adams
For what they're worth.
I'm not sure, honestly. I think they'll try a variety of people on Sid's RW until Beau is healthy. My biggest hope for the rest of the season is that Bennett stays healthy and takes the chance he's about to get by the horns.
To recap: Dupuis almost certainly out for season, ACL surgery in two weeks. Malkin won't play tonight. Orpik and Glass will play. @JoshYohe_Trib
to be fair, there's plenty more ridiculous stuff than your post, but I ignore probably 98% of this board so I don't see it.
I just don't like criticizing Deryk Engelland's impending rise to top-4 defenseman as a 'meltdown.'