Sterling Archer
Registered User
- Sep 26, 2006
- 22,982
- 13,451
100% accurate.They wouldn’t have drafted him over Tkachuk or Hughes
100% accurate.They wouldn’t have drafted him over Tkachuk or Hughes
Maybe it’s just me, but I’d take a D who can move the puck, run the PP, is almost a PPG player, and a + player. Yep, take that guy all day long. Exactly what MTL needs on D.I don't get what people see in Hughes. Butter soft, no defense, you don't win championships with guys like him. Yes he can get points, but the rest......
Runs the pp He’s great at that I’ll take a dman who gets 60-70 pts a year over KotkaniemiI don't get what people see in Hughes. Butter soft, no defense, you don't win championships with guys like him. Yes he can get points, but the rest......
It’s not just you I’ll take him any day You pair him with your best d Man It’s just logicalMaybe it’s just me, but I’d take a D who can move the puck, run the PP, is almost a PPG player, and a + player. Yep, take that guy all day long. Exactly what MTL needs on D.
I know, who wants a PPG puck moving defenceman?? Nah, I’ll take a awkward poor skating 3/4c!!It’s not just you I’ll take him any day You pair him with your best d Man It’s just logical
Either BT or Hughes would have changed the dynamic of this team.Runs the pp He’s great at that I’ll take a dman who gets 60-70 pts a year over Kotkaniemi
He woulda looked amazing next to Weber or chairot or Edmundson
So would have a different GM...................its a sad game we can play there.....Either BT or Hughes would have changed the dynamic of this team.
Let's be real, KK is not a bust just because of the Habs, we reached by picking him early and brought him up too early.KK and Jake Evans are on the same PPG (82 gms). One is a 7th rounder and the other is a 3rd OVA. The KK fanboys are creative when coming up with the BS excuses for his poor play. I guess it's not the coach, his linemates, the city, the hotdogs, the weather. KK was a wasted picked. Thankfully the new regime has a BPA philosophy that wont draft project head cases at #3.
There is no debate anymore. KK is a bust 3c at best, Suzuki is a legitimate 1/2C.
Or... they would've been wrecked.Either BT or Hughes would have changed the dynamic of this team.
Thing is though, we consistently ensure that players don't reach their potential. Maybe Leblanc was never going to make it for example but we made SURE he wouldn't.Let's be real, KK is not a bust just because of the Habs, we reached by picking him early and brought him up too early.
Let's be real, KK is not a bust just because of the Habs, we reached by picking him early and brought him up too early.
Or... they would've been wrecked.
That's the problem with the way the club has been run. We haven't been able to develop our way out of a paper bag. The Canadiens are a notoriously conservative organization and it's cost us in terms of the players we've produced.
I was talking with somebody not long ago about Wickenheiser vs Dennis Savard. We did a piss poor job on a blue chip player who never should've busted and meanwhile Savard went onto fortune and glory in Chicago. But can any of us imagine Savard under Jacques Lemaire? Do you think he'd have been dipsy doodling under him? No way...
I'm not defending one pick over another btw. Hughes has done really well and there's no way based on the results that anyone wouldn't call him a rising star. But Caufield was can't miss too and we were playing him on the 4th line... If CC didn't get fired he'd still be there now.
Yep, the there’s always next year KK go to.I'm so happy KK is gone. I don't have to hear so much about his elusive "potential" anymore.
You’re right, he’s a bust because he is still the same flawed player that they drafted. 3c at 3ova is a bust.
I'm okay with that assessment.Nope, both were better players with more refined skill sets. KK was a project that should never have been picked 3ova.
Agreed. "Bust" is overdoing it for a guy who should at least be a solid 3rd line center for years.If KK is a bust what would you call a player like Barrett Hayton(#5) or Vitali Kravtsov(#9)???? KK may never become a elite center. He is still a decent nhl player.
It's not. You've got a good chance at a top six player in the top five but it's far from guaranteed. An everyday player is not a bust.You’re right, he’s a bust because he is still the same flawed player that they drafted. 3c at 3ova is a bust.
Nope you are wrong You can’t stunt a PP QB It’s literally impossible unless you don’t play himI'm okay with that assessment.
But my point still stands. I don't think Hughes does in Montreal what he did in Vancouver. I think he would've been stunted here.
I'm okay with that assessment.
But my point still stands. I don't think Hughes does in Montreal what he did in Vancouver. I think he would've been stunted here.
Agreed. "Bust" is overdoing it for a guy who should at least be a solid 3rd line center for years.
It's not. You've got a good chance at a top six player in the top five but it's far from guaranteed. An everyday player is not a bust.
And I'd have said you couldn't stunt a player like CC... but we did. Fortunately we got rid of the old regime in time to save him.Nope you are wrong You can’t stunt a PP QB It’s literally impossible unless you don’t play him
He woulda got his points regardless who coached
Yea he wouldn’t have red Weber beauty passes You’re right…..
No dude. A top five player isn't the sure fire first liner you think it is.Nope, a player picked 3rd overall that might become a 3c is a bust. There is no sugar coating it.
Sounds great... In the regular season. Hughes would get crucified in the playoffs as a top pair D. He's have to sheltered a lotMaybe it’s just me, but I’d take a D who can move the puck, run the PP, is almost a PPG player, and a + player. Yep, take that guy all day long. Exactly what MTL needs on D.
No dude. A top five player isn't the sure fire first liner you think it is.
Sounds great... In the regular season. Hughes would get crucified in the playoffs as a top pair D. He's have to sheltered a lot