What I took from this: Josh Yohe is so far up Dan Bylsma's ass that he may as well be wearing him as a meat suit. So while he attempts to levy justified criticism, he couches it by absolving him of all blame and saying - without support - that anyone would have made the same mistakes.
I dunno. To me this seemed like he just wanted to call Dan a Kardashian without making an enemy. You'll notice the criticism is very specific and the praise very general (read 'general' as 'empty'). This article is something out of Mean Girls. "Her ass is fat, she's crosseyed and she smells...but she's such a beautiful person!!!"
Maybe it's not that brave to do it this way, but stealthily, this is the meanest thing I've seen written about Dan in the Pittsburgh media that wasn't written by Madden.
Edit: reading this again, if I were Dan, I'd be more insulted by this article than one that outright called me an irredeemable slob. He's pissing in Dan's pocket and telling him it's rain.
I think you guys are still critiquing and holding Yohe to the normal standards of journalism. I've given up most hope from expecting him and his buddy to meet those so I guess I viewed it more from a 10th grade perspective (thanks IC!).
Anyways, yes, a lot of the article is contradicting. I was more surprised though to actually see him acknowledge any of the misgivings that so many here have justifiably aimed at Bylsma. Incredibly low expectations? Absolutely, but that doesn't necessarily mean all of it is wholly inaccurate. I agree, Dan Bylsma was not the victim of extraordinary circumstances that no one else could've possibly overcome. Danny boy did this to himself, probably with an assist from Rejan for not putting his ass in place when it needed to be. As IC said, great coaches find a way to move through those issues.
Inflated ego, early success leads to a perceived invincibility of his decision making, no accountability (or questionable selectiveness at best). All those seem to align with what many hear felt were issues. It's not the whole story, it's not presented in the best way, it's self contradicted later on, but hey, considering the source, I was surprised to see even a hint of acknowledgement towards it.
It's amazing how two reasonable people can read the same article and come to vastly different conclusions. I'm with IcedCapp here. Also, why the hell should Yohe care about making an enemy with a guy that isn't coaching the team anymore. Want to show some guts? Write this same article after the loss to Boston last year. It's all based on some weird memory he had of him from his first encounter so it's not like he just learned of this revelation.
I wasn't insinuating that you or anyone else who appreciated the article was a 10th grader, sorry if that's how it came across
Madden's #2 choice is Ron Wilson, really? (#1 is Stevens).
Also Madden is saying that their is some word that Sutter is planning on retiring after next season, so Stevens might just stay out there to take over the team after he leaves.
http://media.ccomrcdn.com/media/sta...dden_june_17_hour_2_seg_4_st_0_1403024633.mp3
Madden isn't making that up about Sutter wanting to retire. I've heard that over the last couple of seasons.
I'm fairly certain Madden made that up about Sutter. "Some word" just means using logic. It seems logical that Sutter would retire at some point in the next few years given his age and success in LA. Stevens seems like a likely HC choice should Sutter retire. Madden made it up.
There was speculation about Sutter wanting to retire soon from the Canadian media as well. I think he heard what those guys were saying and parroted it.
I love how Rossi posits himself as Mr Insider, but ever since Rutherford got to town, Dave "verify all rumors with six sources and get 8 quotes from a principle before I'll print anything" Molinari is days ahead of everyone on every "inside" everything (with quotes in tow, lol).
I assume he and JR are drinking buddies from, like, 40 years ago.
Lol Rossi has no idea what's going on. What a dolt.