luongo321
Registered User
- Apr 12, 2011
- 12,247
- 33
Luongo is as clear of a #1 in the NHL as there is.
Totally agree. As long as he can stay healthy, he'll do just fine.
Last edited by a moderator:
Luongo is as clear of a #1 in the NHL as there is.
Sure wish we had traded Raymond after his 'breakout' season.
You are familiar with "Buy low sell high", aren't you? If you get a return for a 40 goal scorer Kesler, and he only scores 30 the rest of his career, you won the trade.
People even mentioning a Lack/Luongo controversy should really GTFO. Luongo is as clear of a #1 in the NHL as there is.
You would never see a thread about a goalie controversy after a win by Jeff Zatkoff on the Pens board.
Last year you would have if a defenceman blocked a shot...
So then we should have traded Kesler after his 75 point season? If we had done that, we would have never made the Stanley Cup Finals. Your analysis is very black and white, there are many variables. Why would we have traded Raymond after his break out season when we were in dire need of top 6 wingers?
I agree there shouldn't be a controversy. We have a goalie who is young, cheap, talented and comes with great credentials. Luongo can pack his bags any time.
How was it a "brutal post"? He had to take a shot from distance on his backhand...it was just bad luck that it didn't go in.
Brutal luck* on the post. Didn't phrase that properly, my bad.
Although for a 7M dollar player who has the skills to win the accuracy contest at the All-Star game, it'd be nice if one of our supposed leaders could not choke to finish on an empty net. If this keeps happening I'd look at stripping Daniel of his A and giving it to someone with actual empty net finish like Booth.
No, that would be Fleury or Rask.
.932 SV%, 1.74 GAA. Hard to imagine he'll stay anywhere near that, but he's definitely showing that he has potential to be a top tier (or top 10, anyway) starter.
Makes Luongo very very expendable, especially considering their salary differences.
It's still way too early to say much about Lack, but all of the signs are positive.
Just a fun fact for you all.... At the end of november... $1 bet on Vancouver making the playoffs would have turned a profit of $33 If they make the playoffs at the end of the year
Who was really offering $33 to $1 on VAN making the playoffs? I call BS.
Can people please make this a chant whenever Lack makes a big save?
I guess Quick is expendable in LA too? I guess the Rangers can get rid of Lundqvist now too?