That's actually false. NHLe is a far superior predictor of NHL success than scouts. When it's "wrong" it's usually in cases like Sam Bennett where... it was actually right after all.
Incorrect.
Like, blatantly incorrect.
JFresh (I think) or maybe Bacon posted NHLe since like 2012 near the draft this season. Going down the board, they work at bout 50%; Similar to traditional scouting. These are just analytics; like, basic analytics.
Player A scores B points in league C
League C is equivalent to Y/1 NHL points.
Player A thus scores Y/1 NHL points.
Player A, scores B points in League C
Based on player A's Y/1 NHL Points, at his age, he is scoring at the rate of Players W, X, Z in the past, and has the star potential of players M, N, O.
This is how you can get gems like Nikita Kucherov being far away the best prospect at the 2011 draft. But also how you get gems like Mikhail Grigorenko being far away the best prospect at the 2012 draft. OR how you get guys like Sam Gagner, considered can't miss stars based on these models. I appreciate them as a tool, but they're just that, a tool.