McGarnagle
Yes.
- Aug 5, 2017
- 28,906
- 38,593
The 2 year deal makes me think he might be Seattle bait. Give them a 2nd rounder and say take Kampfer instead of someone more important.
Hopefully this means Miller gets dealt
The team appears to be putting a backup plan in place in case Lauzon, Clifton and/or Vaakanainen show that they simply aren’t ready or in Lauzon’s case, dealt elsewhereUmm...thanks Steve. I thought his play in the regular season, and certainly in the playoffs, earned him a #6 job somewhere...and that appears so...but he’d rather stay in Boston as the emergency pro D.
Always nice to hear when a player shows they really want to be here.
I’d personally rather move forward with a Lauzon, or something, if need be...but for that money, I can’t argue against bringing back a guy that showed he can succeed in this system at the highest level. Not going to find a better emergency D, I suppose.
I wish we had had Miller against St. Louis.
Or Grzelcyk the rest of game 2I wish we had had Miller against St. Louis.
I completely disagreeHe wouldn’t have made a difference.
I’m no expert but think this is another step so certain defence don’t get exposed in expansion draft, this is being overlooked by many fans.The team appears to be putting a backup plan in place in case Lauzon, Clifton and/or Vaakanainen show that they simply aren’t ready or in Lauzon’s case, dealt elsewhere
I’m expecting Miller to be moved at this point. With Moore missing a few months, this allows them to carry a 7th defenseman and let the kids keep playing in Providence until they’re needed
His contract can be 100% buried in the AHL if required. A great 8th defenseman to have since he gets along with the rest of the team. Can play if necessary. Bruins had to use 12 D last year so every extra D that can play while not costing you much is a win.
The 2 year deal makes me think he might be Seattle bait. Give them a 2nd rounder and say take Kampfer instead of someone more important.
I said the same thing on Twitter to a bunch of people losing their **** over the signing, and they keep coming back at me with, "they have too many D" and "what about the kids"?
I am not sure how some people can't see that this is just insurance, with literally zero risk and potentially a great move?
People used this reasoning to justify the Moore signing. Which of our two 7th D is Seattle gonna select???
Who's the other 7th defenseman? Kampfer and ____________________ ?
So many people think the kids are going to come right in and be studs but thankfully the Bruins front office isn't all rainbows and sunshine.I said the same thing on Twitter to a bunch of people losing their **** over the signing, and they keep coming back at me with, "they have too many D" and "what about the kids"?
I am not sure how some people can't see that this is just insurance, with literally zero risk and potentially a great move?
I can see why you wouldn't be he got outplayed by Grz for the job that Moore was brought in to do, often becoming a healthy scratch (rightfully so). On this team, barring any trade of a LHD, he's a 7th defenseman.I don't consider Moore a 7th defenseman.