Dr.Sens(e)
Registered User
There may be a few similarities to Noesen and Foligno, but I don't think it's really an apt comparison.
Noesen, as noted, is a much better playmaker with excellent vision. Foligno isn't much of a playmaker at all, and is at his best in the open ice taking it to the net. Foligno probably has better one-on-one moves and might be a bit better skater, but I think Noesen is better in most other areas offensively. I also think Noesen is a tad meaner and better in the corners, although Foligno was a solid shift disturber at times, even if it meant a few too many goalie interference penalties.
I actually think Noesen is a much better potential fit long-term as a complimentary winger on a scoring line than Foligno, as he makes the players around him better. Foligno was kind of a black hole if you passed it to him, and always was hurt by the fact he had a below average shot and no real one-timer. Foligno would be a 25 goal scorer plus if he had a better shot - a way too high % of his goals are highlight reel types for a guy who never scored 20 goals.
Noesen, as noted, is a much better playmaker with excellent vision. Foligno isn't much of a playmaker at all, and is at his best in the open ice taking it to the net. Foligno probably has better one-on-one moves and might be a bit better skater, but I think Noesen is better in most other areas offensively. I also think Noesen is a tad meaner and better in the corners, although Foligno was a solid shift disturber at times, even if it meant a few too many goalie interference penalties.
I actually think Noesen is a much better potential fit long-term as a complimentary winger on a scoring line than Foligno, as he makes the players around him better. Foligno was kind of a black hole if you passed it to him, and always was hurt by the fact he had a below average shot and no real one-timer. Foligno would be a 25 goal scorer plus if he had a better shot - a way too high % of his goals are highlight reel types for a guy who never scored 20 goals.