Because if you hit on him you don't have to go back and re-sign him for a multi-year multi million dollar deal.
At worst he's in the AHL where there's plenty of room even if he's making more than he should. At best he's in the NHL making a 1/3 of what he should be paid.
This tweet was from June 25th ....
Figured it would be 2 years though. Still, low money, so not a big deal. Happy with it.
If, IF he can stay healthy, then yes this is a steal.
The great insider, Mr. Travis Currie, has graced us with his presence.
I'm honoured.
I still don't understand this signing lol
The Eaves and Pitlick comparison is pretty garbage. There's no need to compare the two. One was an injury prone 30 year old vet, the other is an injury prone 25 year old with barely any NHL experience.
We gave Pitlick a 3 yr deal when he has like 50 career NHL games. There's a lot more risk involved in it.
Also, his last name is just gross.
You're being dramatic to call a 3 year, $1M AAV contract a risk. He's getting paid like a 4th liner, and 100% of his contract can be stashed in the AHL. Gaglardi may not get all the value he'd like out of the money ... that's about the only risk.
I agree it's not entirely like Eaves mainly because Eaves was Nill's guy .. someone he trusted and was familiar with. The only way you can reasonably characterize this transaction is no risk and high reward. Best case scenario, he's a Top 9 forward. Worst case scenario, he's in the AHL and counts zero against the cap. More than likely he'll spend time injured, but he'll probably get in some games.
Post some charts!!!
Not a risk at all. Pitlick will be a solid signing for us.
I'll be cheering for the guy. Plays with intensity. But the Eaves comparison is a bit of a stretch unless we're ignoring his sudden breakout. He's a straight line player. Plays a physical game, but he's also made of glass. He's a very good fourth liner.
Auto correction agrees, wants to call him Potluck.
Satan;134424855[IMG said:http://hockeyviz.com/fixedImg/teamShotLocOffWo/1617/EDM/pitlity91[/IMG]