Star Wars Battlefront II (Nov 17)
- Thread starter Hollywood Cannon
- Start date
John Price
Bet
- Sep 19, 2008
- 373,729
- 24,749
This will probably get some initial hype from nostalgia then die pretty quickly. The problem with 64 player lobbies is the game is over in like 5 minutes. They didn't really think that through. Lives need to be increased to like 1000 each side.
John Price
Bet
- Sep 19, 2008
- 373,729
- 24,749
People upset about the bugs early. 2 unplayable. joined this morning and stuck in waiting for player. 1 more playable
'Probably one of the worst launches of all time': Star Wars: Battlefront Classic Collection players tear into Aspyr for bugs, crashes, and 3 64-player launch servers for nearly 10,000 users
The Classic Collection was meant to bring balance to Battlefront, not destroy it.
Oogie Boogie
Registered User
- Apr 9, 2011
- 23,924
- 3,092
Dubi Doo
Registered User
- Aug 27, 2008
- 19,370
- 12,854
John Price
Bet
- Sep 19, 2008
- 373,729
- 24,749
EA never gonna stop being EA. Jesus christ what a mess...
I know it was Aspyr that did the collection, but EA should have f***ing known or at least given some form of a shit.
I know it was Aspyr that did the collection, but EA should have f***ing known or at least given some form of a shit.
Commander Clueless
Hiya, hiya. Pleased to meetcha.
- Sep 10, 2008
- 15,307
- 3,041
'Probably one of the worst launches of all time': Star Wars: Battlefront Classic Collection players tear into Aspyr for bugs, crashes, and 3 64-player launch servers for nearly 10,000 users
The Classic Collection was meant to bring balance to Battlefront, not destroy it.www.pcgamer.com
3 servers!?
Like I understand how companies have to err on the side of caution when it comes to server cost but that's just ridiculous.
This developer needs to aspire to do better.
John Price
Bet
- Sep 19, 2008
- 373,729
- 24,749
It's actually pretty decent if you can find a server. Apparently many servers that are full aren't even showing up, so the only servers most people see are 0/64 or 10/64 which is pretty lame.
PeteWorrell
[...]
- Aug 31, 2006
- 4,682
- 1,819
Aspyr already showed their colors when they promised to reintroduce lost content and they just didn't. I have zero faith in them doing things right.
John Price
Bet
- Sep 19, 2008
- 373,729
- 24,749
still a bit laggy but i'm surprised how much better the game is after monday's patch. full 64 player servers actually show up now!
Sad People
Registered User
- Jun 4, 2021
- 3,748
- 1,685
Sad People
Registered User
- Jun 4, 2021
- 3,748
- 1,685
The 2017 one or the original? No clue on the original but the 2017 one is very fun. It had a terrible release but it's been a good game for years
Sad People
Registered User
- Jun 4, 2021
- 3,748
- 1,685
Yeah idk haven't played it and don't plan to. They didn't think it through. 200 elim lobbies with 32 players each sides means each player needs like 6-7 elims. 5 minute games is pathetic. And frankly the gameplay and graphics just don't hold up to modern games
Sad People
Registered User
- Jun 4, 2021
- 3,748
- 1,685
You're probably better off playing the original BF1 and 2 then. Much cheaper too.
John Price
Bet
- Sep 19, 2008
- 373,729
- 24,749
Barely any packed servers. Either they're hidden again or everyone just quit, because I only see one 10/64 player servers in search
