Yeah I get what you're saying.
Gotta also wonder why all planets have one biome, government, economy, etc.
Makes for easy world building and storytelling but it's not very creative. Lots of sci-fi is guilty of it.
Yeah I get what you're saying.
Gotta also wonder why all planets have one biome, government, economy, etc.
Actually, the worst "trope", if you will, is that all humanoid life forms on other planets/galaxies speak perfect English. Not French, Spanish or Polish, but English. Give or take the occasional Klingon, that is.
Yeah I get what you're saying.
Gotta also wonder why all planets have one biome, government, economy, etc.
Simply not true - but the Prime Directive prevents contact with less advanced civilizations still afflicted with nation states and nationalism. Also, there are several episodes of Star Trek with 2 or even 3 competing civilizations or 1 advanced civilization victimizing the less advanced.
The Prime Directive more or less states that the Federation can't make contact with any civilisation that hasn't achieved warp technology on their own, which goes hand in hand with 'less advanced civilisation' and nationalism.
Yes. The premise is that any civilization that advanced technically will also have advanced sociologically. But they do have occasional exceptions. Both Klingons and Romulans display some societal ******ation.
Speaking of the Romulans, whatever happened to them? They seemed to just disappear in later incarnations of ST.
Uhura's from the USA - the United States of Africa...according to Star Trek canon.Not so. They are all using the ubiquitous Universal Translators.
The worst one is theEarthUSA dominance of the United Federation of Planets. We get a token Russian, a token Japanese, a token Vulcan and a few other token humanoids. Even the token black person is American.
Uhura's from the USA - the United States of Africa...according to Star Trek canon.
True true...but this was all revolutionary stuff back in the 60s. A black woman on the bridge? A Russian? An Asian? Never mind the guy with the pointy ears who was 2nd in command. As far as I know, there was nothing close to Star Trek's United-Nations-in-Space vibe on TV or film. It was probably the least USA-centric US show in the history of American television up to that point. The Beachcombers had a less diverse cast. It was quite a unique thing.I said USA domination.
True true...but this was all revolutionary stuff back in the 60s. A black woman on the bridge? A Russian? An Asian? Never mind the guy with the pointy ears who was 2nd in command. As far as I know, there was nothing close to Star Trek's United-Nations-in-Space vibe on TV or film. It was probably the least USA-centric US show in the history of American television up to that point. The Beachcombers had a less diverse cast. It was quite a unique thing.
Star Trek was more in the line of literary sci-fi where the story takes place in "the future" but really, a lot of it is about current issues. Definitely a nerdier flavor of sci-fi.
Star Wars is really fantasy in a sci-fi setting. The Force is pure magic. Epic and awesome (at least the first trilogy) but they're very different breeds of cats.
Well, no one's going to watch a show with French captain...wait a minute...True - and they were even given a lot of credit for that back in '67(?). But they haven't advanced much since. The Federation is still Earth dominated and Earth is still USA dominated in many ways.
I've always heard that Star Trek is for Nerds while Star Wars is for dorks. Or do I have that backwards?
I bought this t-shirt when I was last in Las Vegas. I thought it was pretty funny and it seemed appropriate for this topic...
It was determined that Romulans were just foul-tempered Vulcans.
I've always heard that Star Trek is for Nerds while Star Wars is for dorks. Or do I have that backwards?