BonkTastic
ಠ_ಠ
The top 5 sucks but after that until 40ish overall is normal
That's a best case scenario.
More likely, this draft looks a lot like 2004 in the first few rounds, but without a Malkin or Ovechkin-type at the top.
The top 5 sucks but after that until 40ish overall is normal
That's the exact opposite of what all the scouts/experts are saying. There is a clear top 5, then a drop-off where guys can go anywhere among 2-3 tiers.
Except Spezza is totally justified, why the hell would he want to play in a city where the fans blame everything on him? If I were Spezza I would do the exact same thing, I wouldn't want to play for this piece of **** fanbase.
The top 5 sucks but after that until 40ish overall is normal, then its pure trash of prospects.
People are still digging into this draft? Yeah the top isn't sure fire star calibre players. But after that it's still a normal draft. Lots of luck involved.
We don't have a first so people are reassuring themselves that we didn't miss out on much
Huge assumption, HUGE.
You are completely ignoring the facts and just being emotional.
Fact: Spezza signed a $49M USD contract for seven years to play in Ottawa, the city according to you where the fans/media blame him for everything.
Fact: Less than one year ago, Spezza clearly stated he wanted to be captain of this team and lead it into the future.
So obviously after 10 years, all the lousy fans and media weren't bothering Spezza last fall.
It is too easy to blame the fans or the media for Spezza's weaknesses on the ice.
These things are on Spezza.
IMO there is a more likely explanation for the potential trade.
Management realizes without JS changing his game to some extent, they can't win with him without spending more money than is affordable and even then, no guarantee.
Management/coaches want to establish a work ethic based culture for this young team, a job that is impossible to accomplish if the captain doesn't offer and show his full support.
At the yearend interviews MacLean/Murray provide Spezza with their feedback, explaining, as captain, he needed to embrace the idea of change and work with MacLean.
What happened after that is anyone's guess, but IMO it lead to where the two sides are today.
You can't play like a primadonna and lead a team. Hockey is a tough game. You need a leader who leads by example. This team will not win with him here. Bring in a couple tougher, less skilled players who go to the wall for the team and you will see improvement. I don't mean fighting I mean Battling.
You can't play like a primadonna and lead a team. Hockey is a tough game. You need a leader who leads by example. This team will not win with him here. Bring in a couple tougher, less skilled players who go to the wall for the team and you will see improvement. I don't mean fighting I mean Battling.
You can't play like a primadonna and lead a team. Hockey is a tough game. You need a leader who leads by example. This team will not win with him here. Bring in a couple tougher, less skilled players who go to the wall for the team and you will see improvement. I don't mean fighting I mean Battling.
That's the exact opposite of what all the scouts/experts are saying. There is a clear top 5, then a drop-off where guys can go anywhere among 2-3 tiers.
You dont need to be an expert to ask a question....
The way I see it is that there's a clear cut number 1 (Ekblad). After that there's a second tier of about 5-6 prospects. The first round of the draft after about the 10th pick is going to be a crapshoot. If you have a first round pick you are going to get a good player. Second round is where the talent really drops. After around 45-50 there's a significant drop. If we could get the 10th pick then we would get a very good prospect. Even with our 40th pick we'll still be getting a good player.
Hockey Prospect‘s has Ekblad 3rd
Red line Report has Ekblad 2nd
ISS has Ekblad 2nd
Future Considerations has Ekblad 1st
I'm not sure where McKeens has Ekblad, but they had him ranked 2nd in March.
I guess what I'm saying is there isn't a clear consensus that Ekblad is the BPA.
Hockey Prospect‘s has Ekblad 3rd
Red line Report has Ekblad 2nd
ISS has Ekblad 2nd
Future Considerations has Ekblad 1st
I'm not sure where McKeens has Ekblad, but they had him ranked 2nd in March.
I guess what I'm saying is there isn't a clear consensus that Ekblad is the BPA.
I'm with Future Considerations and a few of the other scouts strongly believe that Ekblad is the consensus number 1! I personally think he is the best player too after watching him this year
I think Florida on record said they will take Ekblad if they don't trade the pick. Same with Calgary! But you're right, you never know just my opinion.
OH, FC means Future Considerations!
And here I thought your username meant Conor Football Club.
Florida would be wise to grab Ekblad — although they've put themselves into a great position, regardless. Their system is so stocked that they can afford to draft on BPA alone (whoever they may think that is) without even slight consideration given to position.
Not among these services, but when listening to Tim Murray, he made it quite clear whoever gets 1st will 100% be taking Ekblad